PDA

View Full Version : Leabron for MVP.......



VernonWellsFargo
03-06-2008, 06:29 PM
Since when do you win MVPs because you have the ball in your hand 99.7 percent of time? last time i checked Kobe did that and they gave it to steve nash. Lebron wont even make it past detroit or boston this year. We all know david stern and the NBA hate Kobe, but for fcks sake give the man his props when its due.

CLiTMASTA
03-06-2008, 06:32 PM
lebron for mvp if he can pull a victory over the bulls with 7 minutes left

KingCanuck
03-06-2008, 06:33 PM
I bet you diodn't have a problem when Kobe was scoring 40 points every 2nd game, a few years ago right?

Scorpion613
03-06-2008, 06:45 PM
I bet you diodn't have a problem when Kobe was scoring 40 points every 2nd game, a few years ago right?

I didn't. I loved the streak of 9 straight 40 PT games while Shaq was on the team. Then there was the 62 points in 3 quarter, 81 points, and 4 straight 50+ games. :D :D :D :D :D

Kobe should have won MVP. :(

JIGSAW
03-06-2008, 06:50 PM
Leabron for MVP.......??????????????

who the fcuk is Leabron?

Jonesy08
03-06-2008, 07:17 PM
LeBron is the most valuable player in the nba this season imo (as was Kobe that year he went bannana's) and deserves the award.

Did you even see how piss poor the Cavs are without him? They would be lucky to win 20 games a year without LeBron yet he manages to drag them to the playoff's and even to the finals last year.

Kobe is awesome, Dwight has had a great year, CP3 has exploded into superstardom and Nash has done his thing but LeBron deserves the award imo.

kooldude
03-06-2008, 07:42 PM
except defense, Lebron has better stats than Kobe in almost every aspect. I really think Lebron closed the gap already and going to surpass Kobe this year. Lebron is even more clutch than Kobe this year. And I'm a huge Kobe fan.

But Kobe = MVP. the award is largely based on team success and Kobe get that part done much more than Lebron.

Scorpion613
03-06-2008, 08:17 PM
except defense, Lebron has better stats than Kobe in almost every aspect. I really think Lebron closed the gap already and going to surpass Kobe this year. Lebron is even more clutch than Kobe this year. And I'm a huge Kobe fan.

But Kobe = MVP. the award is largely based on team success and Kobe get that part done much more than Lebron.

not so sure about the "Lebron is more clutch part". I guess technically he is since he is averaging more 4th quarter points. But, both Lebron and Kobe proved to lead their teams to wins in and make clutch shots this season. It's just that Lebron's team needs him more, so he is doing more.

Kobe deserves the award because: For the past 2-3 seasons Kobe has been having killer stats, not as good as Lebron's but close, and has been scoring more. He's had a decent record, I think one or 2 games over .500 and he didn't get the MVP simply because of his team's record. The Cavs' 57% win percentage will finish them off at under 50 wins, and the Lakers are going for 55+ wins. As long as the Lakers keep winning, then Kobe deserves the award.

DubV
03-06-2008, 08:17 PM
Kobe should have won it when he averaged like 35 points a game in 06

Negatron617
03-06-2008, 08:47 PM
u mad?

who cares about mvps except for people who cant win the rings

root for a championship, if it doesnt look feasable root for an mvp

get your priorities straight tho

i'll trade you a kobe mvp for a celtics championship

VernonWellsFargo
03-07-2008, 10:10 AM
u mad?

who cares about mvps except for people who cant win the rings

root for a championship, if it doesnt look feasable root for an mvp

get your priorities straight tho

i'll trade you a kobe mvp for a celtics championship

jus sayin, Kobe should have won a MVP already. but since what happened in colorado hell prolly never get one

Negatron617
03-07-2008, 10:25 AM
jus sayin, Kobe should have won a MVP already. but since what happened in colorado hell prolly never get one

i might agree with that.....not the colorado part tho

sillz100
03-07-2008, 10:39 AM
u mad?

who cares about mvps except for people who cant win the rings

root for a championship, if it doesnt look feasable root for an mvp

get your priorities straight tho

i'll trade you a kobe mvp for a celtics championship

Its a team game, no one person can win a championship.


And its not voted on my stern and the nba. So them hating kobe has nothign to do with it. The media hating kobe has something to do with it. The people who vote do not watch all the games nor enough of them to have an educated opioin. Its pretty obvious who is going to get it each year.


Kobe/lebron/kg/cp3

those are the top 4 vote getters this year in MVP. CP3//KG deserve to be second more than lebron though IMO.


The media wants to give it to lebron SOOOOO badly though. And they dont want to give it to kobe, but kobe is head and heals above any1 else.

Powers
03-07-2008, 07:53 PM
This is a great great read and is exactly why i think kobe should win the mvp this year and if he doesnt the award is a joke.

"As we head into the final stretch of the season, the MVP discussions have began to heat up. As they have, one thing has become painfully obvious. Whether he has earned these honors or not, he will not receive them. It's not my place to decide if Kobe Bryant, Lebron James, Chris Paul, or Kevin Garnett is most deserving of this award. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Each of those players have staked a rightful claim to the award with their play this season. What is unfortunate though is that one of the favorites to win this award is not being given a fair and objective chance at winning it.

Prior to Colorado, and the sexual assault allegations, Kobe was the NBA's golden child. Similar to Lebron James the media had latched on to him early. A boy wonder with a squeeky clean image. That image would forever be shattered after those allegations. The story then became that of a fallen hero. Like a greek tragedy, people were entertained by the idea of an ego-driven star who had broken up a dynasty, driven out it's other stars and Hall of Fame Coach. Kobe the villain sold newspapers and improved ratings. That is not to say that he has not deserved the criticism he has received. There is one question that deserves to be asked though. Is it truly possible that Kobe was once a model citizen and a great guy, only to one day decide do a complete role reversal and turn into the Anti-Christ? A much more feasible explanation is that he was never as clean, or as evil as his media portrayal.

The reality is that journalists are just people. They take sides. They become offended if they are snubbed by a player, and sometimes they can be vindictive. Yet the NBA's Most Valuable Player award is determined by the sports media. Two seasons ago Steve Nash walked away with MVP honors for the second straight season, joining an elite cast of multiple time winners. Nash had a great season, and kept the Suns afloat without the injured Amare Stoudemire. Kobe Bryant would finish fourth in MVP voting despite averaging 35.4 points, 5.3 rebounds, 4.5 assists and 1.8 steals. His 35.4 points was the most the league had seen in nineteen seasons, since Michael Jordan averaged 37.1 in 1986-87, and he led that Lakers team to a 45-37 record and pushed them to the brink of an upset, going up 3-1 against the Phoenix Suns in the playoffs.

Allow me remind you of his roster at that time. That team featured Smush Parker, Kwame Brown and Luke Walton as 3/5 of it's starting lineup. Kwame Brown is stinking it up on one of the leagues worst teams and Smush Parker has been on paid vacation for most of this season by the league's worst team. Luke Walton had his break out season the next year, but averaged just 5 points and 3.6 rebounds that season. To have led that team to 45 wins and the brink of an upset was truly an accomplishment for Kobe. Say what you will about the Cavaliers supporting cast this season, but they are innumerably better than Kobe's Lakers team two seasons ago.

Yet 22 members of the media didn't even feel that Kobe was worthy of a top five vote. The 125 man panel gave him 22 first place votes, 11 second place, 18 third place, 22 fourth place and 30 fifth place votes. If cornered with the question of why Kobe Bryant failed to receive more two votes the de facto response were that his Lakers team simply wasn't good enough. The MVP usually goes to the best player on one of the best teams. Okay, I can respect that. The media backed up that notion last season by voting Dirk Nowitzki as the league's MVP.

What I don't understand is that many members of the same media have suddenly done a 180 on the criteria of MVP this season. Kobe has taken more of a backseat role this season. He has allowed his teammates to do more, and in the process the Lakers have become a better team. Even before the acquisition of Pau Gasol, the Lakers were the top team in the West prior to Bynum's knee injury. His 28.3 points, 6.1 rebounds, 5.3 assists and 2.0 steals is more impressive than the 24.6 points, 8.9 rebounds, 3.4 assists and 0.8 blocks that Nowitzki posted en route to the MVP last season.

Yet, there is an alarming trend in the media. Suddenly they have decided that the old criteria didn't make much sense after all. In recent weeks the Lebron for MVP talk has picked up. The Cavs are 35-27 and in 4th place in the much weaker Eastern Conference. The Lakers are 43-18 and second in the Western Conference, despite battling injuries all season. Let's put that into perspective. Despite playing in the much weaker conference, and thus having a lighter schedule, the Cavaliers current record would place them as a 10th seed in the west, or two seeds away from the last spot in the playoffs.

ESPN's John Hollinger answered some questions on his choice of Lebron James, followed by Chris Paul as his MVP candidates earlier this week. He began by explaining that 58 of the 82 games are identical between the two conferences and that it shouldn't make a large difference in the win/loss column. I'm sorry John, but that just won't fly. That leaves a whopping 30% of the eason where western conference teams are battling it out with much stiffer competition. Mr. Hollinger knows this well, as his power rankings are determined by a statistical analysis which calculates the Strength of Schedule. According to his own power rankings the Cavs would place as the 15th best team. The Cavs have faced the 18th most difficult schedule in the league this season. The Lakers meanwhile are even with the Mavericks for the 7th most difficult. Of the ten most difficult schedules to date, only three of those teams were in the eastern conference, topped by the Knicks at #4. If the strength of schedule means so little, then why does he weight it so heavily in his standings? In the end he would explain that he felt that Lebron was head and shoulders above the rest of the league right now, and for that reason he would get his vote. If that were the case then why didn't he vote for Kobe two seasons ago?

Kelly Dwyer shared his sentiments in a recent article at Yahoo Sports. He would say in that article that Kobe probably should have been the MVP in the 2005-2006 MVP race, and not have been punished for playing on an otherwise poor team. He would then explain his thoughts of why Lebron has been a better player this season and deserves the award this season. The problem here is that Kelly Dwyer wrote an article two years ago at when he picked Lebron James as his MVP then. Why the change of heart now? Does anyone honestly believe that the Cavs supporting cast is weaker right now than the Lakers was two seasons ago? If next season Kobe averaged 50 points a game beause the rest of his team died in a plane crash but the Lakers struggled, would the criteria change yet again?

Has Lebron really surpassed Kobe as the games best player? If you look at statistics, then a strong case can be made. Lebron outdoes Kobe in just about every statistical ranking at a glance. Lebron averages 2.3 more points, 2 more rebounds and 2.3 more assists per game than Kobe. He also shoots a better field goal percentage and has more blocks. Kobe has a higher free throw and three point percentage, as well as averaging more steals. He does play a couple more minutes per game than Kobe. On the surface it seems like an easy choice if the criteria is purely on who is the better player. Numbers can be deceiving though.

The most important difference is defense. You know, the activity that occurs during the other half of the game. Kobe has been on the all-defensive team seven times in the past eight seasons, including five first team appearances. Lebron meanwhile is an average defender. The interesting thing is that some members of the media have attempted to do the jedi mind trick on us, and convince us that Lebron has turned into a good defensive player. While I agree that his defense has definitely improved, to call him a good defender would be a stretch. Effective Field Goal Percentage is a representation which takes three point baskets into the equation of field goal percentage. Opposing small forwards have shot a 50% eFG against Lebron this season. Meanwhile, Kobe has held opposing shooting guards to a mere 44.1% eFG against him. That's a huge difference.

Next up is rebounding. Both players are good rebounders at their positions. The difference is the positions they play. Kobe plays 77% of his minutes as a shooting guard, and the remaining 23% as a small forward. Meanwhile Lebron plays 73% of his minutes as a small forward, and the remaining 27% as a power forward. Rebounding is primarily a responsibility of forwards, and not guards.

Assists is a no brainer. Lebron is a better passer and more willing passer than Kobe. Kobe leads his team in assists year in and year out though. Over the past seven years Kobe has averaged 5.4 assists per game. His primary role though, is as a scorer. As a scorer, Kobe is second to none. Despite chasing Lebron for the scoring lead this season, Kobe is still the better scorer. His field goal percentage as a result of 74% of his shots being outside shots, as compared ot 61% of Lebron's shots. Kobe shoots 45.8% efG on his jump shots though, as compared to James' 39.3%, that's the difference of 6.5%. The big difference difference here is that Lebron is taking 22.3 shots per game, as compared to just 20.4 by Bryant. That is nearly 7 shots less per game than Bryant took two seasons ago.

At the end of the day you can make a strong argument for either player as the games best. Do you value Lebron's passing or Kobe's defense? What you can not argue though is that Lebron makes his teammates better and that Kobe does not. This is an argument that gets used seemingly any time the two are compared. Apparently averaging more assists equals out to making your teammates better. Nevermind the fact that the triangle is not an assist-friendly offense. Let's just stick to the undeniable facts and compare the teammates of both players. The only player who has shown any significant improvement prior to being traded to play with Lebron are Drew Gooden and Carlos Boozer. Boozer was a rookie the year before Lebron came, and had a decent year with him before heading to Utah. His field goal percentage dropped with Lebron but his scoring average went from 10 to 15.5. They only played together one season. Drew Gooden saw his field goal percentage leap by 4.7% in his first season with Lebron, and his scoring average jumped by 2.8. His scoring would drop back down in later seasons.

Ilgauskus was an all-star before playing with Lebron. He has not shown any improvement. In fact the only career high he can boast since the arrival of Lebron is in blocked shots. What has been most confusing about Lebron's game though is that they have brought in a number of guys who have played absolutely terribly with him. One would have to wonder why Kevin Ollie saw his shooting percentage drop from 45.1% the season before playing with Lebron to 37% in the season playing alongside of him. He was only 31 years of age. Ricky Davis was traded mid-season in Lebron's rookie season. He responded by lifting his shooting percentage by 5.7% and his three point percentage by 2.6%. Eric Snow had averaged 12.1, 12.9 and 10.3 points in his three previous seasons, while shooting 44..2%, 45.2% and 41.3%. He joined Lebron at age 31 and plummeting to 4 points per game on 38.2% shooting, despite playing a 22.8 minutes per game.

Powers
03-07-2008, 07:54 PM
The next season they made the moves that were supposed to move them into contention. They brought in Donyell Marshall, who had long been a deadly shooter. He had averaged 11.5 points on 41.6% from beyond the arc the season before, and had shot 40% or better from that range for the past two seasons and routinely averaged in the low teens. Yet in three seasons with the Cavs he never shot better than 35.1% from that range or averaged more than 9.3 points. Damon Jones was also brought in to space the floor. The 29 year old averaged 11.6 points on 43.2% shooting from beyond the arc and 45.6% from the field the season before in Miami. Those numebrs dropped to 37.7% shooting and 6.7 points playing under Lebron, however. The largest disappointment though was Larry Hughes. Hughes was an all-defensive player who was coming off a year in which he averaged 22 points on 43% shooting. He had averaged 18.8 points the season prior to that. Yet he never averaged more than 15.5 points or 40.9% shooting in three seasons with Lebron. He was recently traded to the Chicago Bulls and saw a 4.1 point and a 4% leap in his field goal percentage in the seven games since the trade. It's way too early too make any determination on the impact of his latest shooter, Wally Szczerbiak, but it should be noted that in the six games since joining the Cavs he has seen his fielg goal percentage plummet by 13.6% and his three point percentage drop by 4.9%.

I don't want to hear how Lebron makes his teammates better ever again. There simply is no statistical analysis to support this. In fact, he seems to destroy the shooting stroke of the guys brought in to spread the floor for him. Oddly enough, the guy who for years the media has said does not make his teammates better, has indeed done a much better job.

Perhaps the best indication is Smush Parker. Smush bounced around from team to team for a couple of years, never having averaged more than 6.2 points or shot better than 41.9%. The previous season he averaged 3 points per game. Yet he averaged 11.5 and 11.1 in two years with Kobe, having career best numbers in both shooting and three point shooting in each of those seasons. He left to the Miami Heat thsi season, where he saw his average drop by 6.3 points, his shooting percentage by 12.1% and his three point shooting by 11.5%. Chris Mihm was a 45% shooter on his career, with a career high 48.8% from the field. Not only did he have career highs in scoring average during each of his first two seasons with the Lakers but he also shot above 50% in each of those seasons prior to his injury. Kwame Brown had never shot above 49% in his career, yet he shot 52.6% and 59.1% as a Laker. He was traded mid-season this year and since that trade he has seen his field goal percentage drop from 50.3% to 35.3%. The other big man in that trade, Pau Gasol has seen his field goal percentage raise from 50.1% in Memphis to a whopping 59% alongside of Kobe, as well as raising his scoring average by 1.8 per game. Gasol is a 51.1% career shooter who had never shot better than 53.8%. The third piece of that trade, Javaris Crittenton, has sene his shooting percentage drop from 49.1% to 38% since it was made. Another mid-season acquisition in Didier Ilunga-Mbenga has seen a similar rise. He shot 31.3% from the field last season, and 39.1% in 16 games with Golden State this year. He has shot 45.5% in 14 games with the Lakers. Derek Fisher's three years away from L.A. saw him shoot 39.3%, 41% and 38.2% from the floor. Since returning to the Lakers he has shot 44%. Laron Profit suffered a career ending injury in his first season as a Laker. In the 25 games prior to his injury though he shot 47.6%, his previous career high was 43.8% with two seasons under 40%. Jumaine Jones shot 39.1% from beyond the arc and 43.2% from teh floor playing alongside Kobe, after shooting 34.4% from teh floor and 29.5% from beyond the arc the season before. Since leaving he has never shot better than 40.5% from teh floor or 34.3% from long range. Chucky Atkins also had arguably his best season alongside of Kobe, scoring 13.6 per game while shooting 38.7% from beyond the arc. He hasn't matched either number since.

Lamar Odom has in the eyes of some struggled to co-exist with Kobe. In many ways this is true, as both guys like to have the ball in their hands. In reality though he had shot under 43.9% in each of his three previous seasons before joining Bryant, and never above 46% in his career. He has shot 47.3%, 48.1%, 46.8% and 50.4% in his four seasons with the Lakers. His scoring has dropped slightly, by a couple of points a game. The other odd case is Caron Butler. Caron became an all-star after being traded from the Lakers, and some might use that as justification that Kobe held him back. The reality though is that Caron averaged a career high in both points per game and in field goal percentage in his season with Kobe. His field goal percentage jumped 6.5% from the season before and was 2.9% higher than his previous career best.

In the end, there is plenty of evidence to support Kobe making his teammates better, but not much at all to support Lebron doing so. In fact the evidence would seem to point the opposite way. You can read into that what you will. But at the end of the day members of the media will soon determine who is the NBA's next MVP. It's a reasonably safe bet that the name on that trophy will be Lebron James and not Kobe Bryant. In the aftermath of that you will hear a lot of rhetoric and hyperbole about why they gave him the award. What I would like to see from those very same writers though is to address the things written here. Kobe has been among the best, if not the best player in the NBA for a very long time. Yet he has never won the trophy. At just 23 years of age, Lebron is going to have many chances to hang that trophy. Kobe Bryant is not. He has earned it by the very criteria that they set out. In a perfect world he would be the 2007-2008 MVP. In reality though, that is not likely to happen. Not because he hasn't earned it, but because too many of the people who have earned a vote simply do not like him."

Scorpion613
03-07-2008, 08:12 PM
wow Powers... I read most of what you posted, and the part where he examines the stats of Lebron is amazing. I was telling people this in the Lebron vs Kobe debate, but I never had actual stats to prove it. Do you have a link to the article?

Powers
03-08-2008, 09:35 AM
I got the article from the lakers prosportsdaily forum. The person their said he could not find a link to the article so I dont really know where its from. Yea ive never really thought twice about the lebron makes his teamates better like everyone says but in reality if you look at guys like hughes who were flops in cleavland then it is so clear.

johnny-oh
03-08-2008, 11:13 AM
Kobe deserves it

sohard88
03-08-2008, 11:16 AM
Damn that was a good article man, nice post

Lloyd Braun
03-08-2008, 01:41 PM
Kobe really should've gotten an MVP already at this stage in his career. Really, the only thing that I can think of that has resulted in him being exluded thus far, is his so-called "relationship" with many of the voters. Many of the voters just don't like him.

sillz100
03-08-2008, 01:48 PM
Kobe really should've gotten an MVP already at this stage in his career. Really, the only thing that I can think of that has resulted in him being exluded thus far, is his so-called "relationship" with many of the voters. Many of the voters just don't like him.

x2 if he loses it, it will be because of politics. People just don't want him to get it.

~~~He is the best player in the league. (has been for a while, undisputed)

~~~He has sacrificed stats to make his team better.

~~~He has got his team invovled and made all the players around him better (except kawmee, he is gone and doesnt count)

~~~They have the best record in their conference.

CerealKiller
03-08-2008, 01:56 PM
Picking an MVP now is like naming the winner of a game after the 3rd quarter.

Too much season left to play.

repos
03-08-2008, 02:42 PM
until lebron hits 62 or 81 he will never close the gap

CerealKiller
03-08-2008, 02:47 PM
until lebron hits 62 or 81 he will never close the gap

or wins the title

Krunk Fu
03-08-2008, 02:51 PM
or wins the title

or have a player like Shaq in his prime by his side?

Yukk
03-08-2008, 02:57 PM
Since when do you win MVPs because you have the ball in your hand 99.7 percent of time? last time i checked Kobe did that and they gave it to steve nash. Lebron wont even make it past detroit or boston this year. We all know david stern and the NBA hate Kobe, but for fcks sake give the man his props when its due.



MVP should be somebody who helps out his team the most. If Lakers go to the finals or win a champsionship this year and Kobe does not get MVP...im gonna boycott the NBA.

Let me put it this way:

Lakers without Kobe= Barely a playoff team, maybe not even a playoff team.
Lakers with Kobe= Mostly likely will go far in the playoffs, maybe even all the way.


Cavs without Lebron= SUCK
Cavs with Lebron= SUCK, probably won't make it out of the first round.


Whos the real MVP?


Also not to hate on Lebron but does anybody else notice how much he walks? There are atleast 2 to 3 plays a game where he walks and never gets called.

Yukk
03-08-2008, 02:59 PM
or wins the title

Also Lebron is not nearly as clutch as Kobe at the end of the game. He does go off in the 4th quarter but when it comes ot winning games on final shots, he chokes most of the time.

CerealKiller
03-08-2008, 03:04 PM
Also Lebron is not nearly as clutch as Kobe at the end of the game. He does go off in the 4th quarter but when it comes ot winning games on final shots, he chokes most of the time.


Like I said earlier, declaring an MVP at this point in time is liking declaring a winner of a game after the 3rd quarter. The 4th quarter and playoffs still have to be played. Kobe could have a season ending injury tomorrow. Who is the MVP then?

Yukk
03-08-2008, 03:24 PM
Like I said earlier, declaring an MVP at this point in time is liking declaring a winner of a game after the 3rd quarter. The 4th quarter and playoffs still have to be played. Kobe could have a season ending injury tomorrow. Who is the MVP then?


I agree with you, but the problem is that they announce MVP before the playoffs start? Atleast thats what they did last season no? They should announce MVP after the season is over because playoffs play a big part in determining the MVP.

CerealKiller
03-08-2008, 03:28 PM
They should announce MVP after the season is over because playoffs play a big part in determining the MVP.

Couldn't agree more.

Lloyd Braun
03-08-2008, 04:41 PM
Also Lebron is not nearly as clutch as Kobe at the end of the game. He does go off in the 4th quarter but when it comes ot winning games on final shots, he chokes most of the time.

LOL. Somebody was asleep while watching LeBron's first playoff series. How many buzzer-beaters did he have again in that series? Yea. And of course he choked in the fourth against those Pistons last year...

Keep sippin that haterade.

ajn
03-08-2008, 04:57 PM
How many buzzer-beaters did he have again in that series?
those were layups, and he couldn't even get to the hole on those shots without traveling. unfortunately the refs were on his nuts and let him get away with it.

Getdiesel1212
03-08-2008, 04:58 PM
those were layups, and he couldn't even get to the hole on those shots without traveling. unfortunately the refs were on his nuts and let him get away with it.

You have no idea what you are talking about. He gets doubled team and he still makes it to the hole. Quit talking ... please..

Jonesy08
03-08-2008, 05:53 PM
You have no idea what you are talking about. He gets doubled team and he still makes it to the hole. Quit talking ... please..
exactly. What's he supposed to do settle for a contested jumper when he can power to the rack for the score / foul or both....

The only reason i feel Kobe deserves the award is because he has been overlooked in the past and the overall record of the team plays a huge role in who gets the award. I have been very impressed with Kobe in the fact that he appears to be willing to sacrifice his own personal stats to help the team win.

LeBron will have many chances in his career to get the mvp, the dude is amazingly still the age of many of the rookies and already has 10k+ points.

Powers
03-08-2008, 09:03 PM
No one can deny the last game against detroit because it was spectacular but you fail to mention how in the next round, the championship round he was completely swept and manhandled by the spurs. Every game of the series was a blowout and that was easily the easisest playoff series for the spurs. He choked on the biggest stage and you cannot deny that. When kobe was lebrons age he already had 2 rings on his fingers. Yes he had shaq but he was 2nd team all nba and 1st team defense. He was one of the best players in the league.

flytiger
03-08-2008, 09:38 PM
the mvp is absolutely tmac this year

kooldude
03-08-2008, 10:03 PM
I'm a big Kobe fan but Lebron has been better at clutch time than Kobe this year. Sure, the Cavs have been more close games so Lebron has more opportunities but isn't that how a clutch reputation is given? Based on when your team needs you the most.

http://82games.com/CSORT11.HTM

sohard88
03-08-2008, 10:17 PM
I'm a big Kobe fan but Lebron has been better at clutch time than Kobe this year. Sure, the Cavs have been more close games so Lebron has more opportunities but isn't that how a clutch reputation is given? Based on when your team needs you the most.

http://82games.com/CSORT11.HTM

But lebron is really their only good option so of course he has more points in the last 5 mins when the game is close. Thats why the Lakers record is so much better cuse they have other options D Fish for a 3, or Gasol as of late, Bynum before he got hurt even Lamar sometimes.

Powers
03-09-2008, 10:25 AM
I agree with those stats their but the stat that some people bring up about 4th quarter points definitly cannot be used due to the many games kobe has sat out the entire 4th quarter due to it being a blowout.

Scorpion613
03-09-2008, 11:13 AM
I agree with those stats their but the stat that some people bring up about 4th quarter points definitly cannot be used due to the many games kobe has sat out the entire 4th quarter due to it being a blowout.

He sat out the other night because we were up by 30+ at the end of the third. :D How many times have the cavs been up by 30+ where Lebron sat out the entire 4th? :p

There have been more than 5 games this year where Kobe sat out the entire 4th.