Bodybuilding.com Information Motivation Supplementation
in:

    The World’s #1 Bodybuilding And Fitness Forum - Save Up To 50% Off Retail Prices In Our Bodybuilding.com Store!

Reply
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 198
  1. #1
    Registered User TysonH's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2002
    Posts: 179
    Rep Power: 0
    TysonH is not very helpful. (-500) TysonH is not very helpful. (-500) TysonH is not very helpful. (-500)
    Visit TysonH's BodySpace
    TysonH is offline

    Bowflex Vs. Free weights

    Ok, I am into looking at getting a bowflex. I heard they are good, but are they as good as free weights? I have been told it does the same thing. However, it's hard for me to believe it works just as well because when you are using free weights, such as doing bench or curls, that weight is pushing you down, and then you must push the weight back up. Hwoever, on a bowflex, there is not weight pushing you down, you just have to push out. To me, it seems like it is not working as many muscles, and as efficiently. NE1 here try a bowflex and disagree with me? Ne comments would be great..thanks all.
    ~Tyson~
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Ogre in training Black_Spit's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2002
    Location: Nashville, Tennessee, United States
    Age: 33
    Stats: 5'10", 3 lbs
    Posts: 25,280
    BodyPoints: 17807
    Rep Power: 24730
    Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Black_Spit has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit Black_Spit's BodySpace
    Black_Spit is offline
    How old are you, what is your experience and what are your goals?

    In almost every scenario, free-weights are a better choice. Perhaps in certain rehab situations, a bowflex may be a good choice... and, maybe some others, but, I can't think of any.
    Training Journal - http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=159606881

    My Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQszcQsyFs3v9atwwtW3rJA
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Only 180lbs in the pic MiketheSwede's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Location: Alberta, Canada
    Age: 33
    Stats: 6'0", 206 lbs
    Posts: 725
    BodyPoints: 5553
    Rep Power: 22
    MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MiketheSwede is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit MiketheSwede's BodySpace
    MiketheSwede is offline
    not sure if going to a gym is an option for instead of bowflex or anything you can buy and have at your house, but IMO, almost ANY gym isbetter then home equipment.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Easily Confused GimpyPaw's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: In a state called Denial
    Age: 46
    Posts: 4,072
    BodyPoints: 7318
    Rep Power: 6808
    GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) GimpyPaw has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit GimpyPaw's BodySpace
    GimpyPaw is offline
    OK, let's look at the force requirements for something simple, like flat bench press.

    Bowflex - Any resistance band/bow type machine will have less resistance at the beginning of a motion, with the resistance increasing as you proceed through the motion. At the lower point of the bench press you will face LESS resistance than at the top, or fully contracted position of the exercise.

    Barbell - Because gravity is constant, the weight and force required to move the barbell will be equall throughout the entire motion. The only exception to this rule would be when sufficient speed is gained in the movement so as to allow inertia to partially carry the weight for a limited durration.

    Now, with most compound exercises, the amount of work done by each muscle will vary depending on what phase of the motion you are in. With the Bench Press, the pecs hold the primary responsibility at the lowest point of the exercise, but as the bar moves upward the tri's and delts increase their percentage of the load. Unfortunately, it is at the lower point of the exercise that the Bowflex offers the LEAST resistance.

    So if your goal in performing the bench press was for the development of your chest, free weights are a better choice. If you really want to know how much better a good power rack / bench / barbell setup is over a Bowflex, check Craigslist.org Search for "power rack", then search for "Bowflex"

    People sell their useless crap while keeping the good stuff. Let us know which one people seem to be trying to unload the most.
    When the opportunity has arrived,

    The time for preparation has past.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Howawesomethisnarcississm Gator Brah's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: Gainesville, Florida, United States
    Stats: 6'0", 18 lbs
    Posts: 14,175
    BodyPoints: 7133
    Rep Power: 13239
    Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Gator Brah has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit Gator Brah's BodySpace
    Gator Brah is offline
    i wouldn't recomend the bowflex for 2 reasons. 1 there are limited amounts of exercises that you can do and over time your body will get uesed to them.
    2 the resistence comes from a flexing rod so while at the top of the motion it will be fairly easy by the time you get to the bottom of the motion its next to impossible to perform. in other words the resistence is not consitent, spend the money on a gym membership.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User TysonH's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2002
    Posts: 179
    Rep Power: 0
    TysonH is not very helpful. (-500) TysonH is not very helpful. (-500) TysonH is not very helpful. (-500)
    Visit TysonH's BodySpace
    TysonH is offline
    Ok I am 20 years old..I am 160 lbs...so my main goal is to gain weight and put on muscle. I know i can get that by eating and lifting weights. I thought a bowflex would be nice cuz it isn't AS expensive as the machines u can guy. Plus with machines your body is doing the same range of motion EVERYTIME you lift. Also, I can do squats and bench press without a spotter. Another reason, I could lift at home. Thanks for the replies
    ~Tyson~
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User taylorjonl's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2004
    Location: WVC, Utah
    Age: 36
    Posts: 396
    Rep Power: 18
    taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000) taylorjonl is a name known to all. (+5000)
    taylorjonl is offline
    Don't get a bowflex. I bought one, sold it for 50% of what I paid for it. They suck compared to free weights.
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=712752
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    GRanD ChaMP! Teckademics's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 31
    Stats: 5'9", 164 lbs
    Posts: 230
    BodyPoints: 3871
    Rep Power: 20
    Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Teckademics is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit Teckademics's BodySpace
    Teckademics is offline

    Smile

    From wut i heard, bowflax is geared more towards tonning. The reason why free weights r so great for building is that they stimulate ur stabilizer muscles, which is crucial in gaining mass.
    Plus! It's boring to work out by urself at home alone! get out there, join a gym, make friends, and most importantly stay motivated .
    gl man.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    glitter boy (no hetero) TwiloMike's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 11,429
    BodyPoints: 35744
    Rep Power: 7542
    TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) TwiloMike has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit TwiloMike's BodySpace
    TwiloMike is offline
    Originally Posted by TysonH
    Ok I am 20 years old..I am 160 lbs...so my main goal is to gain weight and put on muscle. I know i can get that by eating and lifting weights. I thought a bowflex would be nice cuz it isn't AS expensive as the machines u can guy. Plus with machines your body is doing the same range of motion EVERYTIME you lift. Also, I can do squats and bench press without a spotter. Another reason, I could lift at home. Thanks for the replies
    Your thinking is flawed- with free weights you get to develop not only your major moving muscles but the stabilizing muscles as well. With machines you are often locked into a specific motion. For whatever you plan to pay for that bowflex go out and get a gym membership- the variety of excercizes will do you well, as well as the variety of equipment.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    tone inner core fozed's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 43
    Posts: 23
    Rep Power: 0
    fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Visit fozed's BodySpace
    fozed is offline
    not sure what the number of used bowflex's for sale have to do with anything - maybe it's more a result of bowflex's advertising?

    And your example of the bench press also points out the limitations of free weights - they always resist against gravity. Therefore, the finishing motion of a bicep curl is wasted on freeweights - but not on the bowflex (in fact the bow is at it's strongest resistance). In addition, you can push a lot harder working out alone because working to failure doesn't leave you in a bad situation.

    I have both the bowflex extreme and the selecttech dumbbells - they compliment each other well. Free weights do help w/stablizer muscles and do feel different from the bowflex in the resistance range. However, you gain muscle from anything that offers resistance.

    I've found on this site most people dislike bowflex after trying them a handful of times, those that acutally purchased one and stuck with it seem to be very happy.
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Half Norse, Half Animal VikingMan's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: Sharpening my ax
    Age: 36
    Stats: 6'0", 255 lbs
    Posts: 8,183
    BodyPoints: 21856
    Rep Power: 1405
    VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) VikingMan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit VikingMan's BodySpace
    VikingMan is offline
    A lot of it has to do with goals. If you just want to get toned and fit, with a little more strength than your average joe, then a bowflex would work fine.

    The reason the high number of them being for sale second hand is significant is because it points to the fact that not many people keep them. It's a very fad like thing to do, buy a bowflex on credit, use it for three months, and quit.

    If you're serious, and you want to do this with more than just a casual interest, then free weights are the ONLY way to go. Geez, I can't believe this is even a question.

    Ask yourself this, how many huge and ripped guys do you know who use a bowflex? Same question for free weights.

    It's a no brainer.

    Also, the argument of being able to work harder because you can intentionally train to failure is rediculous. Training to failure is like redlining the engine in your car. Bad idea to do it intentionally. Done once in a while, and unintentionally, it's probably not going to kill you right now, but do it often enough, and your CNS takes a beating. Forcing you into a position of not being able to lift at your full capacity.
    How does one destroy darkness? The answer dawned upon my mind, blinding in it's brilliance. To destroy darkness, one must simply expose it to the light.
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Registered User Kurt_Vagner's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 34
    Posts: 7
    Rep Power: 0
    Kurt_Vagner is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    Kurt_Vagner is offline
    Hi,

    a bowflex is better than nothing as resistance exercise in general is very beneficial no matter how it is applied. however, in comparison to free weights it is like a ankle pistol against a tank. any measure of protection is better than none but if I'm going into battle and have my choice of equipment, I want the tank.
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    ♦ ɴɣϲ ϲrew ♦ Phenom01's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2005
    Location: Manhattan, New York
    Age: 25
    Posts: 5,316
    BodyPoints: 18058
    Rep Power: 158
    Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Phenom01 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit Phenom01's BodySpace
    Phenom01 is offline
    Free weights over bowflex anytime. Reasons;
    1) You will eventually get stronger then the bowflex
    2) Its a machine so expect minor gains
    3) free weights strengthens stabilizer muscles
    4) You can buy more weight to add to the bar or dumbbell if you have the olympic version.
    Ron Paul for president!!
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    .l.. o.0 ..l. canyonracerx's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: California, United States
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 170 lbs
    Posts: 1,650
    BodyPoints: 13640
    Rep Power: 215
    canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) canyonracerx has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit canyonracerx's BodySpace
    canyonracerx is offline
    Originally Posted by fozed
    And your example of the bench press also points out the limitations of free weights - they always resist against gravity. Therefore, the finishing motion of a bicep curl is wasted on freeweights - but not on the bowflex (in fact the bow is at it's strongest resistance). In addition, you can push a lot harder working out alone because working to failure doesn't leave you in a bad situation.

    ...wait a sec...Are you trying to argue that a bowflex is BETTER than freeweights? I hope you're getting paid for this.

    Like stated earlier, Bowflex works as a decent toner/maintener and you might be able to gain some mass if you're skinny and out of shape but if you want to put on serious muscle mass there's NO WAY a bowflex is going to do that.
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    tone inner core fozed's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 43
    Posts: 23
    Rep Power: 0
    fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) fozed is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Visit fozed's BodySpace
    fozed is offline
    Originally Posted by canyonracerx
    ...wait a sec...Are you trying to argue that a bowflex is BETTER than freeweights? I hope you're getting paid for this.

    Like stated earlier, Bowflex works as a decent toner/maintener and you might be able to gain some mass if you're skinny and out of shape but if you want to put on serious muscle mass there's NO WAY a bowflex is going to do that.
    I've posted why I think the bowflex *can* be better then freeweights - the only thing the anti-bowflex crowd can do is tell you without any good reason why bowflex sucks.

    From the site's knowledgebase:

    The major limitation to barbells and dumbbells is that their line of resistance is always a straight vertical line - the pull of gravity. Whether you're curling, pressing overhead, rowing, or doing flyes, that iron is always being pulled straight down into the ground. In certain exercises, this presents no problem. Say you're squatting, for instance. The bar is on your back as you descend and rise, (theoretically) straight up and down. It's nearly a perfect movement. But what about those flyes? The motion of flyes involves lying on your back, bringing two dumbbells from a stretch position up into a contraction. If you were to draw the range of motion, you would see an arc for each arm. We know that gravity doesn't arc, it pulls in a perfectly straight line. So what? What this means is that only part of the flye - the part that crosses through that straight vertical line - receives proper resistance.

    It's easier to observe with a barbell curl. Again you have an arc. When you start to curl the bar up from your waist, the resistance feels like nothing, even with a weight you can only manage 6-8 reps with. Quickly you encounter gravity's pull as the arc of motion hits the vertical plane. This "mid-point" of the curl is where most people struggle and get stuck. As you come near the top, you pass the vertical plane, and once again the resistance seems comically light. In essence, the first and last few inches range of motion were useless. In an arm training article I wrote for the December 1997 Ironman, I suggested eliminating these portions of the rep for better results. It should be apparent by now that certain free weight movements have their limitations. How are machines better?

    The answer lies in the cam, or wheel. Arthur Jones was the first to develop the cam, that kidney bean-shaped apparatus that a chain or a belt could track over, effectively creating an evenly distributed resistance over the entire range of motion. This meant not only would you be able to have the weight remain constant, but you would also eliminate the sticking point. Applied to certain exercises, the effect was a vast improvement over their freeweight counterparts. The Nautilus Pullover was and still is many times more effective than the same motion performed with a barbell or dumbbell. But as revolutionary as Nautilus was, machines have gotten even better since the 70's.

    One notable equipment line is Hammer Strength, designed by Arthur's son Gary Jones. Hammer Strength machines are plate loaded, which takes away some of the "machine" stigma, and are among the most effective pieces I have ever used. College and pro football strength coaches across America swear by them. A company called Strive has actually invented machines that allow you to selectively overload specific portions of the range of motion.

    Two more factors in which machines are an improvement on free weights are safety and proper technique. Machines are usually self-spotting, meaning it would be fairly difficult to drop anything on yourself. How many times have you been stuck under a bar with no spotter? Once is enough, believe me. As far as technique, properly executed free-weight movements like the squat or row are excellent for building size and strength. Unfortunately, without proper instruction, which most people don't have, most people never "properly execute" very many free weight exercises.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Registered User saucemang's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2006
    Age: 29
    Posts: 4
    Rep Power: 0
    saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000) saucemang is just really nice. (+1000)
    saucemang is offline

    Bow Flex does fine for me

    i work out on the bowflex e on a regular schedual and i ahve gained weight in muscle and lost fat.... im 5'10 205, im repin 280 on bowflex and i went to the gym the other day and did just that on free weights , a lilttle harder but only b/c i wasnt used to the motion. overall i like it... and im not a skinny kid who was out of shape
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17
    Registered User latrell's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Posts: 2,755
    BodyPoints: 3146
    Rep Power: 108
    latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) latrell has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit latrell's BodySpace
    latrell is offline
    if you want to get big the bowflex is crap. Free Weights only. Don't settle on that total gym **** either. If you want to get into that kind of training save 1000's $$ and buy resistance bands and wrap em around posts and do those exercises (tie 2 or 3 to get bowlex resistance)
    Offering online personal training.. please PM for rates and complete info
    Reply With Quote

  18. #18
    Registered User matter203's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2010
    Age: 39
    Stats: 5'8", 182 lbs
    Posts: 51
    Rep Power: 10
    matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000) matter203 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Visit matter203's BodySpace
    matter203 is offline
    Originally Posted by latrell View Post
    if you want to get big the bowflex is crap. Free Weights only. Don't settle on that total gym **** either. If you want to get into that kind of training save 1000's $$ and buy resistance bands and wrap em around posts and do those exercises (tie 2 or 3 to get bowlex resistance)
    Well, I have to say that I disagree. I lifted free weights extensively in college and got fairly big and was in tremendous shape. Over time life, work, various injuries, and some laziness on my part had me stop lifting for about 8 or 9 years. About 3 years ago I got a bowflex, and did not seriously use it until about 4 or 5 months ago. According to caliper measurements I have dropped about 20 pounds of bodyfat and gained 9 pounds of muscle, with an overall weight loss of 11 lbs, and over 8% bodyfat.

    My legs have gotten to the point that the outsides press so hard against my pant legs if I do any type of squatting motion that I am surprised they haven't ripped the seam yet. They are noticeably bigger and feel like slabs of stone. My lats are almost out past my shoulders again and are noticeably bigger to the point that I have had customers comment on how wide my back looks numerous times over the past month or so. My traps, delts, triceps, pecs, biceps and abs are also noticeably larger.

    I have never been more sore with any workout ever than when i did an FST-7 with my triceps on the bowflex. I was so sore for 3 days that I had trouble sleeping because no matter where I put my arms, they ached and were so sore it was hard to sleep.

    I have no dog in this fight. I have used both extensively. I have seen results with both. I have gotten injured with free weights much more frequently than I have with bowflex. Some exercises seem more effective with free weights, while others have seemed more effective with the bowflex.

    For someone to suggest that one cannot get results with a bowflex, it is just simply not true. To me it seems to be similar to the people who eat 5 times the amount of protein they need and recommend everyone do the same, even though modern science has proven that even 1 gram past your body's required amount will be discarded as waste, turned into energy or stored as fat. Your body only needs the exact amount of protein it needs, no more and no less. For those who use free weights that think you cannot get a good workout on a bowflex, say try it first before you knock it. I am quite sure that many of the people on here talking about it negatively have never tried it before.
    Reply With Quote

  19. #19
    running again... slooowly retiredrunner's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Posts: 5,313
    Rep Power: 3388
    retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) retiredrunner has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit retiredrunner's BodySpace
    retiredrunner is offline
    blahblahblah... bottom line, the Bowflex's gay factor is like... 10 to the 12th power greater than working out with barbells and plates.
    Reply With Quote

  20. #20
    I'll Rest When I'm Dead ironwill2008's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Location: United States
    Stats: 5'8", 193 lbs
    Posts: 61,957
    Rep Power: 133540
    ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ironwill2008 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit ironwill2008's BodySpace
    ironwill2008 is offline
    Originally Posted by matter203 View Post
    Well, I have to say that I disagree. I lifted free weights extensively in college and got fairly big and was in tremendous shape. Over time life, work, various injuries, and some laziness on my part had me stop lifting for about 8 or 9 years. About 3 years ago I got a bowflex, and did not seriously use it until about 4 or 5 months ago. According to caliper measurements I have dropped about 20 pounds of bodyfat and gained 9 pounds of muscle, with an overall weight loss of 11 lbs, and over 8% bodyfat.

    My legs have gotten to the point that the outsides press so hard against my pant legs if I do any type of squatting motion that I am surprised they haven't ripped the seam yet. They are noticeably bigger and feel like slabs of stone. My lats are almost out past my shoulders again and are noticeably bigger to the point that I have had customers comment on how wide my back looks numerous times over the past month or so. My traps, delts, triceps, pecs, biceps and abs are also noticeably larger.

    I have never been more sore with any workout ever than when i did an FST-7 with my triceps on the bowflex. I was so sore for 3 days that I had trouble sleeping because no matter where I put my arms, they ached and were so sore it was hard to sleep.

    I have no dog in this fight. I have used both extensively. I have seen results with both. I have gotten injured with free weights much more frequently than I have with bowflex. Some exercises seem more effective with free weights, while others have seemed more effective with the bowflex.

    For someone to suggest that one cannot get results with a bowflex, it is just simply not true. To me it seems to be similar to the people who eat 5 times the amount of protein they need and recommend everyone do the same, even though modern science has proven that even 1 gram past your body's required amount will be discarded as waste, turned into energy or stored as fat. Your body only needs the exact amount of protein it needs, no more and no less. For those who use free weights that think you cannot get a good workout on a bowflex, say try it first before you knock it. I am quite sure that many of the people on here talking about it negatively have never tried it before.

    That's great that you've made such tremendous progress with a bowflex, a device that the vast majority of posters on this site would say is a POS. In fact, there will probably be several of them posting in this thread to say that same thing soon.

    Why not go ahead and post a few pics of yourself showing your development, and kind of "head 'em off at the pass?"
    No brain, no gain.

    You can't out-train bad nutrition.

    "The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon

    Ironwill Gym:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388


    Ironwill2008 Workout Journal:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
    Reply With Quote

  21. #21
    Lemme tell ya sumthin.... palumboism's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Posts: 427
    Rep Power: 1407
    palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    palumboism is offline
    Originally Posted by matter203 View Post
    I have no dog in this fight. I have used both extensively. I have seen results with both.
    You built yourself with free weights, then regained your lost gains via muscle memory its a lot easier to regain then it is to gain in the first place, you would never have made such gains in the first place if you started with the derpflex.[quote]
    I am the parasite, you are host. Deal with it.
    Reply With Quote

  22. #22
    Registered User hypertek's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Stats: 5'11", 148 lbs
    Posts: 250
    Rep Power: 97
    hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) hypertek has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit hypertek's BodySpace
    hypertek is offline
    i rock a soloflex with weight plates adapted to it, not as good as free weights, but i get tons of work outs out of it, bench, military press, leg press, curls, then leg extensions, butterflies, and using the bench for other various work outs *crunches, dumbbell butterfly extensions*.

    Since my house is small, i have olympic sized bench outside but due to bad weather I been using the soloflex.
    Reply With Quote

  23. #23
    Registered User ImBIGGERThanU's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2004
    Location: California, United States
    Age: 31
    Stats: 6'7", 265 lbs
    Posts: 139
    BodyPoints: 1109
    Rep Power: 14
    ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) ImBIGGERThanU is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Visit ImBIGGERThanU's BodySpace
    ImBIGGERThanU is offline
    @matter203 sorry dude, no one is going to take you seriously and/or believe a word that you say until you post a picture of yourself
    If you have a question or comment about my post... pm me, i will be happy to explain.
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step...
    http://anomoly.wordpress.com
    If you do not work on and expose your weaknesses, your competition will.
    Reply With Quote

  24. #24
    Registered User BoogsDad's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2009
    Age: 39
    Posts: 66
    Rep Power: 6
    BoogsDad is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    BoogsDad is offline
    If Bowflex were all the info-mercials say they're cracked up to be...how comes none of the pros train with them? Free weights give you constant resistance...Bowflex only at the end range. It's like stretching a rubberband. There's no tension until it's stretched out. Use free weights.
    If it A'int Steel, it A'int Real.
    Reply With Quote

  25. #25
    Registered User SumDumGoi's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 3,846
    Rep Power: 12713
    SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit SumDumGoi's BodySpace
    SumDumGoi is offline
    Resistance is resistance. There are no such things as "toning" or "shaping" exercises as people in this thread are claiming. The muscle that you build from the bowflex is exactly the same as the muscle you would build from free weights. The only thing that the body recognizes is overload. As long as you are able to overload the muscle you can build muscle mass. Neither modality is adherently better than the other in regards to producing overload.

    There are many reasons why pros don't train with them. First, most people don't start off training with them. They started out going to the gym, they like going to the gym and they live at the gym. Why would they switch over to a piece of home exercise equipment? It doesn't offer any adherent advantages, but that also doesn't mean that there are any disadvantages. Second, a lot of pros could simply be too strong for the bow flex. If it can't produce the required overload its not going to be very useful. Also, some people may simply not like it. To each their own, however, I am certain that there are many exercises that you don't include in your own programs simply because you don't like them. That doesn't mean that they are useless exercises and others will certainly find success with them.

    The guy suggesting that someone built themselves with free weights is retarded. The guy said he took 9 years off in between! After nearly a decade there isn't much of a base left to work with.

    If your goals are to enter powerlifting competitions, then use free weights as you need to learn the lifts. If you just want to build muscle mass, then it doesn't matter as much as everyone on here is complaining about. Who cares?!?!?!
    Morons to the left of me,
    Idiots to the right, here I am,
    Stuck in here posting with you.
    Reply With Quote

  26. #26
    Lemme tell ya sumthin.... palumboism's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Posts: 427
    Rep Power: 1407
    palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) palumboism has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    palumboism is offline
    Originally Posted by SumDumGoi View Post
    Resistance is resistance. There are no such things as "toning" or "shaping" exercises as people in this thread are claiming. The muscle that you build from the bowflex is exactly the same as the muscle you would build from free weights. The only thing that the body recognizes is overload. As long as you are able to overload the muscle you can build muscle mass. Neither modality is adherently better than the other in regards to producing overload.

    There are many reasons why pros don't train with them. First, most people don't start off training with them. They started out going to the gym, they like going to the gym and they live at the gym. Why would they switch over to a piece of home exercise equipment? It doesn't offer any adherent advantages, but that also doesn't mean that there are any disadvantages. Second, a lot of pros could simply be too strong for the bow flex. If it can't produce the required overload its not going to be very useful. Also, some people may simply not like it. To each their own, however, I am certain that there are many exercises that you don't include in your own programs simply because you don't like them. That doesn't mean that they are useless exercises and others will certainly find success with them.

    The guy suggesting that someone built themselves with free weights is retarded. The guy said he took 9 years off in between! After nearly a decade there isn't much of a base left to work with.

    If your goals are to enter powerlifting competitions, then use free weights as you need to learn the lifts. If you just want to build muscle mass, then it doesn't matter as much as everyone on here is complaining about. Who cares?!?!?!
    This is what happens when someone who doesn't train tries to give advice. Q.F.L [quote]
    I am the parasite, you are host. Deal with it.
    Reply With Quote

  27. #27
    Minister for Propoganda gomez26's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Stats: 6'2", 212 lbs
    Posts: 3,835
    BodyPoints: 4810
    Rep Power: 14808
    gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) gomez26 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit gomez26's BodySpace
    gomez26 is offline
    Originally Posted by SumDumGoi View Post
    There are many reasons why pros don't train with them. First, most people don't start off training with them. They started out going to the gym, they like going to the gym and they live at the gym. Why would they switch over to a piece of home exercise equipment? It doesn't offer any adherent advantages, but that also doesn't mean that there are any disadvantages.
    i think if there really was no difference then commercial gyms would prefer to do away with free weights & go for this sort of thing. the notion that the difference is only psychological is not correct, its actually ridiculous. for some semi-serious home gym owners the compromise is acceptable - they are prepared to receive an inferior stimulus for the sake of convenience, safety etc.

    Originally Posted by fozed View Post
    I've posted why I think the bowflex *can* be better then freeweights - the only thing the anti-bowflex crowd can do is tell you without any good reason why bowflex sucks.

    From the site's knowledgebase:

    The major limitation to barbells and dumbbells is that their line of resistance is always a straight vertical line - the pull of gravity. Whether you're curling, pressing overhead, rowing, or doing flyes, that iron is always being pulled straight down into the ground. In certain exercises, this presents no problem. Say you're squatting, for instance. The bar is on your back as you descend and rise, (theoretically) straight up and down. It's nearly a perfect movement. But what about those flyes? The motion of flyes involves lying on your back, bringing two dumbbells from a stretch position up into a contraction. If you were to draw the range of motion, you would see an arc for each arm. We know that gravity doesn't arc, it pulls in a perfectly straight line. So what? What this means is that only part of the flye - the part that crosses through that straight vertical line - receives proper resistance.

    It's easier to observe with a barbell curl. Again you have an arc. When you start to curl the bar up from your waist, the resistance feels like nothing, even with a weight you can only manage 6-8 reps with. Quickly you encounter gravity's pull as the arc of motion hits the vertical plane. This "mid-point" of the curl is where most people struggle and get stuck. As you come near the top, you pass the vertical plane, and once again the resistance seems comically light. In essence, the first and last few inches range of motion were useless. In an arm training article I wrote for the December 1997 Ironman, I suggested eliminating these portions of the rep for better results. It should be apparent by now that certain free weight movements have their limitations. How are machines better?

    The answer lies in the cam, or wheel. Arthur Jones was the first to develop the cam, that kidney bean-shaped apparatus that a chain or a belt could track over, effectively creating an evenly distributed resistance over the entire range of motion. This meant not only would you be able to have the weight remain constant, but you would also eliminate the sticking point. Applied to certain exercises, the effect was a vast improvement over their freeweight counterparts. The Nautilus Pullover was and still is many times more effective than the same motion performed with a barbell or dumbbell. But as revolutionary as Nautilus was, machines have gotten even better since the 70's.

    One notable equipment line is Hammer Strength, designed by Arthur's son Gary Jones. Hammer Strength machines are plate loaded, which takes away some of the "machine" stigma, and are among the most effective pieces I have ever used. College and pro football strength coaches across America swear by them. A company called Strive has actually invented machines that allow you to selectively overload specific portions of the range of motion.

    Two more factors in which machines are an improvement on free weights are safety and proper technique. Machines are usually self-spotting, meaning it would be fairly difficult to drop anything on yourself. How many times have you been stuck under a bar with no spotter? Once is enough, believe me. As far as technique, properly executed free-weight movements like the squat or row are excellent for building size and strength. Unfortunately, without proper instruction, which most people don't have, most people never "properly execute" very many free weight exercises.
    here is some good discussion as to why arthur jones's 'revolutionary' cams were not as successful as he thought they would be.
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...#post594458843
    i agree with this, i dont think sticking points & lockouts are the 'flaws' that guys like jones made them out to be. having a machine that avoids them is great for a different type of stimulus, not clearly as superior one as jones wanted ppl to believe, for if it was clearly superior then why hasnt it clearly shown to be so in the several last decades these machines been around ??? if they were 4 times better as jones claimed then all serious athletes would only use this for their resistance training needs.
    Nothing Exceeds Like Excess

    Hidden Troll Crouching Parrot.

    You're all figments of my imagination. Entertain me.

    "Though the concept is not scientifically validated in detail (it should be considered as a hypothesis rather than a scientific theory), it is useful from a practical standpoint. When training athletes, it is impossible to wait until scientific research provides all of the necessary knowledge." Vladmir M. Zatsiorsky, Ph.D.
    Reply With Quote

  28. #28
    Registered User Engineer_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2010
    Age: 27
    Stats: 6'0", 190 lbs
    Posts: 9,423
    Rep Power: 13478
    Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit Engineer_Guy's BodySpace
    Engineer_Guy is offline
    Originally Posted by SumDumGoi View Post
    Resistance is resistance. There are no such things as "toning" or "shaping" exercises as people in this thread are claiming. The muscle that you build from the bowflex is exactly the same as the muscle you would build from free weights. The only thing that the body recognizes is overload. As long as you are able to overload the muscle you can build muscle mass. Neither modality is adherently better than the other in regards to producing overload.

    There are many reasons why pros don't train with them. First, most people don't start off training with them. They started out going to the gym, they like going to the gym and they live at the gym. Why would they switch over to a piece of home exercise equipment? It doesn't offer any adherent advantages, but that also doesn't mean that there are any disadvantages. Second, a lot of pros could simply be too strong for the bow flex. If it can't produce the required overload its not going to be very useful. Also, some people may simply not like it. To each their own, however, I am certain that there are many exercises that you don't include in your own programs simply because you don't like them. That doesn't mean that they are useless exercises and others will certainly find success with them.

    The guy suggesting that someone built themselves with free weights is retarded. The guy said he took 9 years off in between! After nearly a decade there isn't much of a base left to work with.

    If your goals are to enter powerlifting competitions, then use free weights as you need to learn the lifts. If you just want to build muscle mass, then it doesn't matter as much as everyone on here is complaining about. Who cares?!?!?!
    There are several useful mass building lifts that free weights provide that you can't really replicate equally on a machine. Squats and deadlifts for example are excellent for those wanting to build mass but are not replicated on something like a Bowflex.

    Free weights will be less expensive than a Bowflex. In fact you will most likely get more resistance and still pay less for free weights. A power rack will take up the about same amount of space as the larger Bowflexes so that's not really an issue. I also don't like home gyms because they tend to have a lot of wasted weight. With free weights you buy the weight you need and that's all. You aren't paying to have a brand name plastered over your weights either.

    You're right, someone could gain muscle doing any sort of resistance. But it doesn't mean there's no difference between different types of resistance. This is why we advise free weights. In my opinion the free weights are clearly superior, and for more reasons than just a better work out.
    Last edited by Engineer_Guy; 12-18-2010 at 12:16 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  29. #29
    Registered User SumDumGoi's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 3,846
    Rep Power: 12713
    SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) SumDumGoi has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit SumDumGoi's BodySpace
    SumDumGoi is offline
    Originally Posted by gomez26 View Post
    i think if there really was no difference then commercial gyms would prefer to do away with free weights & go for this sort of thing. the notion that the difference is only psychological is not correct, its actually ridiculous. for some semi-serious home gym owners the compromise is acceptable - they are prepared to receive an inferior stimulus for the sake of convenience, safety etc.
    Let me point out how idiotic this statement is. You are saying that if there was no difference between the two modalities, why wouldn't commercial gyms just be filled with bowflex equipment. I a assuming you are saying this because you feel the commercial gyms would be saving money. Regardless for your reasoning behind this statement, you seem to be agreeing with others on here that free weights are superior over machines. Since free weights, in your opinion, are superior then why wouldn't the gym simply purchase free weight equipment as it is a much cheaper option to begin with? Why waste the money buying all those expensive machines in the first place if the only factor that matters is effectiveness of the equipment?

    Commercial gyms simply buy the equipment that people like to use. If they didn't have this equipment then they would be out of business. As a gym owner you are not going to stock your gym full of home-exercise equipment because if you do your clients will all just go out and buy the home-exercise equipment.
    Morons to the left of me,
    Idiots to the right, here I am,
    Stuck in here posting with you.
    Reply With Quote

  30. #30
    Registered User Panado's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Age: 25
    Posts: 102
    Rep Power: 5
    Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000) Panado is just really nice. (+1000)
    Visit Panado's BodySpace
    Panado is offline
    I totally agree with the last post, I think bowflex is not the adequate thing to have at home, free wights give you more freedom, and are more usefull
    Reply With Quote

Reply
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Home Store Products Careers Help Contact Us Terms of Use Checkout