Bodybuilding.com Information Motivation Supplementation
in:

    The World’s #1 Bodybuilding And Fitness Forum - Save Up To 50% Off Retail Prices In Our Bodybuilding.com Store!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 51
  1. #1
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline

    Post BSN CellMass vs MuscleTech Cell-Tech

    First of all, let me start off by saying that this comparison is purely based on the numbers. I'm not here to compare which ones works better, I really don't care because you can hear a million different opinions in a million other posts. If that's what you want then use the nifty little search feature.

    Nobody cares what you think about their advertisements or the claims they make. Saying "dat dere Cell-Tech" is old, and makes you look foolish. And we REALLY don't care if you make your own creatine mix, if you can't afford the real deal then don't bother slamming a product. I don't use CellMass or Cell-Tech so I am just going to get to the point now.

    And we all know sugars/dextrose/etc. all make creatine intake much better. Leave it alone.

    BSN CellMass
    http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/bsn/cell.html
    1.4lbs (640g), $36.95, 40 servings
    3g creatine ethyl ester malate, maltodextrin, sucralose

    MuscleTech Cell-Tech
    http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/mt/cell.html
    2.0lbs, $23.79, 10 servings
    4.3lbs, $39.99, 20 servings
    6.7lbs, $57.49, 30 servings
    10g creatine (creatine mono, dicreatine malate, creatine alpha-ketoglutarate), dextrose, various vitamins/minerals, taurine, alpha lipoic acid

    Comparing weight this means to equal Cell-Tech, BSN CellMass would cost:
    4.3lbs @ $113.49 (compared to $39.99 for Cell-Tech)
    6.7lbs @ $176.83 (compared to $57.49 for Cell-Tech)
    Not to mention any extra shipping costs to get those extra bottles of CellMass.

    "But CellMass has 40 servings! Haha!". Yes it has 40 servings, but you are required to take 2 servings per day. This equals 20 real servings.

    Comparing the cost of creatine per gram, it works out like this:
    Cell-Tech 2.0lbs - (100g creatine) 23.8 cents per gram
    Cell-Tech 4.3lbs - (200g creatine) 20.0 cents per gram
    Cell-Tech 6.7lbs - (300g creatine) 19.2 cents per gram
    CellMass 1.4lbs - (120 g creatine) 30.8 cents per gram

    Cell-Tech suggests a loading phase for one week. CellMass claims no loading required. I won't argue the idea one way or the other because there is a pile of research for and against loading creatine. Do whatever works best for you.

    Another interesting fact, on the BSN website they claim that CellMass' patent-pending CEM3 blend is "no bloat, no load, no cycle". But about 2 inches to the right of that claim the product specs suggest a minimum cycle of 6 weeks, optimal cycle of 12 weeks, and cycling off for 4 weeks. No cycle eh?

    Winner: MuscleTech Cell-Tech

    Now lots of people have made good gains on CellMass. And lots of people have made good gains on Cell-Tech. It's a matter of personal preference and some people are just non-responders to one or the other. But so many people complain about the cost of Cell-Tech, well just look at CellMass, much worse.

    *All costs based on BodyBuilding.com listed prices as of 08/31/2006.

    End of story. Flame on all you reps, trolls and shills.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    GFH!! jcilla26's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Stats: 5'11", 207 lbs
    Posts: 2,440
    BodyPoints: 10985
    Rep Power: 928
    jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit jcilla26's BodySpace
    jcilla26 is offline
    GREAT POST! considering the 4.3lb jug of cell tech has only 20 servings...........
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered abUser irongrasshopper's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Location: ENOGGERA, QLD, Australia
    Age: 26
    Stats: 5'11", 203 lbs
    Posts: 545
    BodyPoints: 1564
    Rep Power: 78
    irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit irongrasshopper's BodySpace
    irongrasshopper is offline
    everyone knows celltech will make u 900 times stonger, ur muscles increase in size by 30 times,.....this is all by sitting on a couch drinking beer and eating chips

    nah but serously i would go with the bsn due to quality
    Last edited by irongrasshopper; 08-31-2006 at 06:50 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Originally Posted by irongrasshopper
    everyone knows celltech will make u 900 times stonger, ur muscles increase in size by 30 times,.....this is all by sitting on a couch drinking beer and eating chips

    nah but serously i would go with the bsn due to quality
    Quality in what way? That's a pretty vague statement. The production standards of both companies are both extremely top-notch.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered abUser irongrasshopper's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Location: ENOGGERA, QLD, Australia
    Age: 26
    Stats: 5'11", 203 lbs
    Posts: 545
    BodyPoints: 1564
    Rep Power: 78
    irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit irongrasshopper's BodySpace
    irongrasshopper is offline
    an even better supp would be xpand by dyamatize, it also contains no2 but even without is great for energy and good quality cee creatine
    search it up on the forums and see all the great reviews it has gotten
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Originally Posted by irongrasshopper
    an even better supp would be xpand by dyamatize, it also contains no2 but even without is great for energy and good quality cee creatine
    search it up on the forums and see all the great reviews it has gotten
    I'm sure it is. But this topic is comparing two particular products. Why bother cluttering it up with naming every other creatine product out there. You want the "Best Overall Creatine Product?" forum:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=44607
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    GFH!! jcilla26's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Stats: 5'11", 207 lbs
    Posts: 2,440
    BodyPoints: 10985
    Rep Power: 928
    jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit jcilla26's BodySpace
    jcilla26 is offline
    what exactly is your point to this thread..20 servings of cell mass cost 36.95..20 servings of cell tech costs 39.99
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    I Aim To Misbehave E-Go's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2006
    Location: United States
    Stats: 240 lbs
    Posts: 6,095
    BodyPoints: 10036
    Rep Power: 9340
    E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) E-Go has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit E-Go's BodySpace
    E-Go is offline
    Dude the sugar is cell tech alone f***s up your kidneys. I am however looking foward to see what they have going with nitro-tech hardcore and cell-tech hardcore that they are working on.
    "I thought we said no more Journey psych-outs."
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Originally Posted by jcilla26
    what exactly is your point to this thread..20 servings of cell mass cost 36.95..20 servings of cell tech costs 39.99
    That you still get less creatine and none of the other beneficial ingredients. I thought it was quite obvious. Gram for gram CellMass is far more expensive.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    GFH!! jcilla26's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Stats: 5'11", 207 lbs
    Posts: 2,440
    BodyPoints: 10985
    Rep Power: 928
    jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit jcilla26's BodySpace
    jcilla26 is offline
    because there is alot of garbage in cell tech..and cell tech is mainly MONOHYDRATE which is absorbed way less then CEE like cell mass has in it
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Back in full swing!! Stix_'s Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: Michigan
    Stats: 5'6"
    Posts: 943
    BodyPoints: 1461
    Rep Power: 97
    Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) Stix_ has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit Stix_'s BodySpace
    Stix_ is offline
    Originally Posted by jcilla26
    because there is alot of garbage in cell tech..and cell tech is mainly MONOHYDRATE which is absorbed way less then CEE like cell mass has in it
    Really.... Whats a more proven creatine again??
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    GFH!! jcilla26's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Stats: 5'11", 207 lbs
    Posts: 2,440
    BodyPoints: 10985
    Rep Power: 928
    jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) jcilla26 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit jcilla26's BodySpace
    jcilla26 is offline
    monohydrate is more proven..but i said that CEE's absorbtion rate is higher than monohydrate
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Creatine mono + 75g dextrose (the proven optimal dose) absorbs much faster than creatine ethyl ester.
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered abUser irongrasshopper's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Location: ENOGGERA, QLD, Australia
    Age: 26
    Stats: 5'11", 203 lbs
    Posts: 545
    BodyPoints: 1564
    Rep Power: 78
    irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) irongrasshopper has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit irongrasshopper's BodySpace
    irongrasshopper is offline
    hey stix why did u neg rep me???
    cell tech is overpriced
    cell tech hage huge amounts of sugar
    they make outrageus claims that they cant back up
    spend all their money on advertising instead of the product itself
    muscletech already have a pretty bad reputation
    their creatine mono is no better than any other product, infact in mine and alot of other peoples opinions cee is much more effective
    they say they have ala(but scaming as they r it is mostly "s" type ala wich is practically useless compared to "R" type ala)

    Originally Posted by WCC
    here's something on creatine and insulin:
    http://www.creatinemonohydrate.net/insulin.html


    nearly 20g glucose per gram of creatine? one serving of Celltech contains 10g creatine and 75g sugar; this wouldn't be enough to evoke a strong enough release of insulin. you'd need around 200g per serving in order to achieve such an effect.
    so whilst the theory behind Celltech is correct, in practice it doesn't work because there's too little sugar. so putting in 75g sugar per serving is absolutely pointless. it's enough to rot your teeth and make you fat, but it's not enough to significantly increase creatine uptake.

    bottom line: Celltech is teh ghey.

    is that enough reasons?
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline

    Shill

    This guy is clearly a shill.
    Read this post:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...68&postcount=6

    That is such a bad comparison, it is just awful.

    300g Monohydrate = ~$7
    2100g Dextrose = ~$5
    Homebrewed Cell Tech can cost $15 tops for 30 servings. I personally do not see the need just for ALA or Chromium.

    Cell MASS gives you 6g CEE daily, with close to 500mg Cinnulin-PF, which is very expenisve and good post-Workout, for $25-35.

    Both product's aren't top notch IMO.
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Plenty of people love CellMass, plenty of people love CellTech. All I did was compare some numbers.

    Not being a shill, I recommend anyone go read the post this random newbie linked to.
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17
    I Am Teh Lolrus stealth_swimmer's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2006
    Location: Texas: swimming in a way that you can't detect...
    Age: 26
    Stats: 5'6", 193 lbs
    Posts: 50,519
    BodyPoints: 47972
    Rep Power: 16247
    stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) stealth_swimmer has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit stealth_swimmer's BodySpace
    stealth_swimmer is offline
    CEE is absorbed better, but yeah for those who love mono but who would rather buy Cell Mass are just being haters on Muscle Tech. Cell Tech is fine if you take it post workout. I don't see why people complain about the sugar. Just use common sense. Anyway, I wouldn't use it because CEE is apparently the only kind of creatine that I've tried that has worked for me. I have beef with BSN though so I'm lookin to buy CEE AKG (a blend of two highly absorbably creatines)
    Reply With Quote

  18. #18
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline
    Originally Posted by iDesign
    Plenty of people love CellMass, plenty of people love CellTech. All I did was compare some numbers.

    Not being a shill, I recommend anyone go read the post this random newbie linked to.
    You compared the numbers wrong and put Cell Mass at a disadvantage. There is one important compound in there, Cinnulin-PF. The other ingredients in the blend are just electrolytes, so you can conclude each serving has a comparable amount of Cinnulin as of nearly 2 capsules of Cinnulin-PF by Scivation. 60 capsules of Scivation Cinnulin PF cost $20, so that give Cell Mass a nice jump in price.

    So, bad comparison, and much more while we are going at it. Anyone who does not see this is blind.
    Reply With Quote

  19. #19
    F*ck Genetics!! music_man185's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2004
    Location: NC
    Age: 28
    Stats: 5'7", 170 lbs
    Posts: 1,561
    BodyPoints: 1574
    Rep Power: 59
    music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000) music_man185 has a brilliant future. Third best rank! (+40000)
    Visit music_man185's BodySpace
    music_man185 is offline
    are you on the muscletech payroll??
    Placebo Is One Hell Of A Drug
    Reply With Quote

  20. #20
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Originally Posted by music_man185
    are you on the muscletech payroll??
    No. I receive nothing from any company for what I say around here.
    Reply With Quote

  21. #21
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline
    Originally Posted by music_man185
    are you on the muscletech payroll??
    No, I am not.
    The other character might be.

    Also, he denied my permission to start a poll.
    Looking at his bodySpace, he has two people. Deserusan is possibly affiliated with MuscleTech, and the second character seems to be on a similar bandwagon.

    Take a look for yourself. I am here to point out what is already there.
    Reply With Quote

  22. #22
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline
    Originally Posted by iDesign
    No. I receive nothing from any company for what I say around here.
    Oh, because I never seen anyone put into so much effort with such biased opinions, all for free.
    Reply With Quote

  23. #23
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Originally Posted by smh31
    No, I am not.
    The other character might be.

    Also, he denied my permission to start a poll.
    Looking at his bodySpace, he has two people. Deserusan is possibly affiliated with MuscleTech, and the second character seems to be on a similar bandwagon.

    Take a look for yourself. I am here to point out what is already there.
    You're obviously just someone with another account. I wouldn't be surprised if you yourself work for a supplement company. You created an account tonight and within an extremely short time period went around to every post spreading lies about me being a corporate shill.
    Reply With Quote

  24. #24
    Classic Lines iDesign's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Canada
    Age: 32
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 378
    BodyPoints: 775
    Rep Power: 31
    iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) iDesign has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Visit iDesign's BodySpace
    iDesign is offline
    Originally Posted by smh31
    Oh, because I never seen anyone put into so much effort with such biased opinions, all for free.
    I am also a member of the Toronto Maple Leafs forums and have thousands of posts there. Does that mean I work for the Toronto Maple Leafs now? They don't pay me either but I still give biased opinions on that hockey team.
    Reply With Quote

  25. #25
    dragonpit dragonpit's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2005
    Stats: 5'6", 180 lbs
    Posts: 410
    BodyPoints: 2546
    Rep Power: 0
    dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank) dragonpit is the lowest scum of the boards. (Worst Rank)
    Visit dragonpit's BodySpace
    dragonpit is offline
    cell tech is an awesome creatine if your going for the classic lets get fat and bloated offseason look.(which ive gotten most overall gains from) but most people go for the poster boy image and dont even care about competing so they have the typical goal of wanting to be 6' 200+ with 8%. lee priest use to do this all the time. sure its harder to diet but hey you get the best overall gains.
    Reply With Quote

  26. #26
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline
    Originally Posted by dragonpit
    cell tech is an awesome creatine if your going for the classic lets get fat and bloated offseason look.(which ive gotten most overall gains from) but most people go for the poster boy image and dont even care about competing so they have the typical goal of wanting to be 6' 200+ with 8%. lee priest use to do this all the time. sure its harder to diet but hey you get the best overall gains.
    Cell Tech and Nitrotech combo provides 40g Whey, 11g Creatine, and 70g Carbohydrates post-Workout. That could be considered the ideal that newbies never hit, but it is not worth $100 or however much it costs.
    Reply With Quote

  27. #27
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline
    Originally Posted by iDesign
    You're obviously just someone with another account. I wouldn't be surprised if you yourself work for a supplement company. You created an account tonight and within an extremely short time period went around to every post spreading lies about me being a corporate shill.
    Lies about you? Then why won't you let me start that poll about you.
    All the evidence I need is right on the boards.
    I am not affiliated with any company either. You can run a check on my IP address. Either way, it is of no difference because you're the one that needs to prove yourself tonight.
    Reply With Quote

  28. #28
    Supplement killer PsychoMan's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2006
    Age: 34
    Posts: 133
    Rep Power: 9
    PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500) PsychoMan is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    PsychoMan is offline
    Originally Posted by iDesign
    First of all, let me start off by saying that this comparison is purely based on the numbers. I'm not here to compare which ones works better, I really don't care because you can hear a million different opinions in a million other posts. If that's what you want then use the nifty little search feature.

    Nobody cares what you think about their advertisements or the claims they make. Saying "dat dere Cell-Tech" is old, and makes you look foolish. And we REALLY don't care if you make your own creatine mix, if you can't afford the real deal then don't bother slamming a product. I don't use CellMass or Cell-Tech so I am just going to get to the point now.

    And we all know sugars/dextrose/etc. all make creatine intake much better. Leave it alone.

    BSN CellMass
    http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/bsn/cell.html
    1.4lbs (640g), $36.95, 40 servings
    3g creatine ethyl ester malate, maltodextrin, sucralose

    MuscleTech Cell-Tech
    http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/mt/cell.html
    2.0lbs, $23.79, 10 servings
    4.3lbs, $39.99, 20 servings
    6.7lbs, $57.49, 30 servings
    10g creatine (creatine mono, dicreatine malate, creatine alpha-ketoglutarate), dextrose, various vitamins/minerals, taurine, alpha lipoic acid

    Comparing weight this means to equal Cell-Tech, BSN CellMass would cost:
    4.3lbs @ $113.49 (compared to $39.99 for Cell-Tech)
    6.7lbs @ $176.83 (compared to $57.49 for Cell-Tech)
    Not to mention any extra shipping costs to get those extra bottles of CellMass.

    "But CellMass has 40 servings! Haha!". Yes it has 40 servings, but you are required to take 2 servings per day. This equals 20 real servings.

    Comparing the cost of creatine per gram, it works out like this:
    Cell-Tech 2.0lbs - (100g creatine) 23.8 cents per gram
    Cell-Tech 4.3lbs - (200g creatine) 20.0 cents per gram
    Cell-Tech 6.7lbs - (300g creatine) 19.2 cents per gram
    CellMass 1.4lbs - (120 g creatine) 30.8 cents per gram

    Cell-Tech suggests a loading phase for one week. CellMass claims no loading required. I won't argue the idea one way or the other because there is a pile of research for and against loading creatine. Do whatever works best for you.

    Another interesting fact, on the BSN website they claim that CellMass' patent-pending CEM3 blend is "no bloat, no load, no cycle". But about 2 inches to the right of that claim the product specs suggest a minimum cycle of 6 weeks, optimal cycle of 12 weeks, and cycling off for 4 weeks. No cycle eh?

    Winner: MuscleTech Cell-Tech

    Now lots of people have made good gains on CellMass. And lots of people have made good gains on Cell-Tech. It's a matter of personal preference and some people are just non-responders to one or the other. But so many people complain about the cost of Cell-Tech, well just look at CellMass, much worse.

    *All costs based on BodyBuilding.com listed prices as of 08/31/2006.

    End of story. Flame on all you reps, trolls and shills.
    It's tricky the way you wrote this... It seems that your whole point was to try and make Cell-Tech seem cheaper by comparing weight. You said it yourself "$39.99 for 20 servings of CT," so I don't see "the big savings." Especially when CellMass is "$36.95" - ("But CellMass has 40 servings! Haha!". Yes it has 40 servings, but you are required to take 2 servings per day. This equals 20 real servings.)" and "All costs based on BodyBuilding.com listed prices as of 08/31/2006" If I had 4.3lbs of CellMass it would be somewhat over 60 servings compared to 4.3lbs of 20 servings with CT. You can be one sided all you want, just don't make **** look better than it is.
    Reply With Quote

  29. #29
    Banned smh31's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Age: 31
    Posts: 1,331
    BodyPoints: 5752
    Rep Power: 297
    smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) smh31 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit smh31's BodySpace
    smh31 is offline
    Thats exactly what I am saying. Cell Tech is loaded on Sugar, so it clearly packs more weight.
    Reply With Quote

  30. #30
    nom nom nom deserusan's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2004
    Location: New York, United States
    Age: 34
    Stats: 5'11", 222 lbs
    Posts: 29,341
    BodyPoints: 101388
    Rep Power: 57751
    deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) deserusan has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit deserusan's BodySpace
    deserusan is offline
    I'll moderate this debate because it is funny. For all you guys claiming CEE is absorbed faster than creatine monohydrate and dextrose please provide us with your data. Also, please provide with data that CEE is both safe and effective in athletes.............
    "I just use my muscles as a conversation piece, like someone walking a cheetah down 42nd Street." - Arnold Schwarzenegger

    Heretic....
    Reply With Quote

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Home Store Products Careers Help Contact Us Terms of Use Checkout