who ****ing caresOriginally Posted by Seroph4x
stupid thread
|
-
08-24-2006, 10:08 AM #31
-
08-24-2006, 10:12 AM #32
-
-
08-24-2006, 10:19 AM #33
-
08-24-2006, 11:23 AM #34
All I know is, Chuck Norris couldn't beat Bruce Lee.
But really I think this is a silly thread. Some of you give too much respect to Bruce and some of you give too little respect.
If he actually was alive now and in his prime, don't you think he would work to be more well rounded? To take the best from each art. Wasn't that his philosophy?
I really don't know if he would win or not but I don't think he would get owned. And I am talking about fighting those in his weight class (he would still have to bulk up about 20 pounds).
And Bruce vs Gomi would be a crazy fight.
-
08-24-2006, 11:32 AM #35
- Join Date: Sep 2005
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 21,492
- Rep Power: 1368331
Originally Posted by Swole4Life"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard"
The more I workout at commercial gyms, the more I hate commercial gyms.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be to the Lord my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.
-
08-24-2006, 11:34 AM #36
All most people know about Bruce Lee was from the movies, where he did all the "fancy" moves. What most people don't know is that Lee understood that those moves were not practical in an actual fight and knew one had to be well rounded. He practiced alot of different styles including fighting on the ground and different submissions.
No movie director, especially at that time, would want a fight scence where Bruce took a guy down and put him in an armbar, not exciting enough for the average viewer.
If Lee had been in his prime in today's mma world, no doubt in my mind he would be as well rounded as anybody out there. He was small, but had incredible hand, and foot speed and hit and kicked very hard.
It's easy to look at Lee as he "was" and say he couldn't hang with today's fighters(we will never really know). But I think we have to be fair and imagine him in his prime today and factor in his work ethic, ability, and understanding of all the martial arts and what works and what doesn't, and figure he would probably be able to hold his own.
-
-
08-24-2006, 11:37 AM #37
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqmliQdnB-s
yeah the guy was 130 pounds but check out that speed wow he was fast.
he knew how to get maximum speed out of his little body and was the original founder of MMA in a way with his philosophy.
look at how well royce gracie did at first and he didnt have anywhere near bruce lees speed.
dont underestimate him because he was small his power came from his speed.SPRAINED WRIST as of 10-6-06 (waiting for it to heal)
Current stats
height = 5'7
weight = 230 pounds
waist = 38 inches
arms = 16.5 inches (PR)
bench = 170X6 (4 sets) MAX = 200(PR)
GOAL stats
height = 5'7
weight = 240
waist = 34 inches
arms = 19 - 20 inches
bench = 260 X 6 (4 sets) MAX = 315
-
08-24-2006, 11:45 AM #38Originally Posted by sdtiger
I think brucee if he were 30 today, had the SAME philosephy..would be the king of LW. Can you really see anyone else..knowing his skills forever ago..competing against him if it were now and not 30 years ago?Mirin'triceps peak? Thanks westside barbell.
Gettin'older, studying MMA in Brazil gonna fight soon, on my own crew.
-
08-24-2006, 11:46 AM #39
-
08-24-2006, 12:03 PM #40Originally Posted by wanaBsedated
Hey, good call. I've even seen Enter the Dragon, guess I don't remember the armbar. My point was though (and this came from his wife Linda) was that the directors didn't want that kind of fighting in the movies, but Lee did in fact practice it. Most people just see what he did in the movies and assume that that was all he did.
-
-
08-24-2006, 12:11 PM #41
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfCSqXffcoM
and here is a link to bruce lee vs chuck norris
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKYOSI7Juw8“If there is no struggle, there is no progress.” - Frederick Douglass
-
08-24-2006, 12:11 PM #42
-
08-24-2006, 12:47 PM #43Originally Posted by wanaBsedated
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HooWepN6wLQ“If there is no struggle, there is no progress.” - Frederick Douglass
-
08-24-2006, 12:53 PM #44
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 41,221
- Rep Power: 23268
I think the obvious answer is that he would own everyone in the UFC but not Pride...
Yes I'm kidding."The sun is always gonna rise, and always gonna set and I'll just keep on punching because everyday is gonna bring something different and I just want to be ready for it."
- Jens Pulver
If you refer to a fighter who you've never met in real life as "my boy" as though their performance somehow reflects well on you for simply being a fan, you're a lame ass.
-
-
08-24-2006, 01:23 PM #45Originally Posted by wanaBsedated
When I was in 8th grade I put my friends in armbars because I saw it on wwf. So what, just because I did it before most other people doesn't mean I had any understanding of submission grappling.
In the original ufc they showed ninjitsu and jiu jitsu fighters sparring and using armbars in their training. Then they go out and fight and look like they've never grappled in their lives.
-
08-24-2006, 01:24 PM #46
-
08-24-2006, 01:30 PM #47Originally Posted by wanaBsedated
I don't expect to see some break.com type fight video of bruce, but it would be nice to see SOME kind of proof that he was a good fighter other than he said she said bull**** which is the least reliable source ever. I can have plenty of people tell you that I have wrecked **** against larger opponents, but that doesn't make me the best fighter ever does it? People are easy to impress, especialy people with no understanding of fighting.
If I roll with a larger friend whos never done any grappling and put him in 3 submissions in a row, and everyone runs around talking about what I did and how ausome I am does that make me the best grappler around? No. I could suck ass for all they know, but they don't care about that they just care about what they saw.Last edited by bjjwraslter7; 08-24-2006 at 01:34 PM.
-
08-24-2006, 01:41 PM #48Originally Posted by bjjwraslter7Mirin'triceps peak? Thanks westside barbell.
Gettin'older, studying MMA in Brazil gonna fight soon, on my own crew.
-
-
08-24-2006, 01:46 PM #49
FIGHT RECORD:
1955: William Cheung, Hong Kong.........................Exch.
1957: Wong Shun-Leung, Hong Kong....................Exch
1958: Pu Chang, Hong Kong..................................KO 2
1958: Yang Huang, Hong Kong..............................KO 1
(Amateur Boxing Tournament)
1958: Lieh Lo, Hong King.......................................KO 1
(Amateur Boxing Tournament)
1958: Shen Yuen, Hong Kong.................................KO 1
(Amateur Boxing Tournament-Semi Finals)
1958: Gary Elms, Hong Kong..................................KO 3
(Amateur Boxing Tournament-Finals)
1960: Unknown, Seattle, Washington......................KO 1
1960: Uechi, Seattle, Washington............................KO 1
1963: Unknown, Hong Kong....................................KO
1965: Wong Jack-Man, Oakland, California............KO 1
this is the best I could find as far as his known(in ring, tournament style) fights.
I should note that it was also said that this information may contain errors, or may be incomplete, there could be more fights.
As it stands, his record was 9-0 with 9 KO's.
-
08-24-2006, 01:54 PM #50Originally Posted by bjjwraslter7
I'm not here to argue or tell anyone he's superhuman because he's not. But he did have the respect of many people who knew a thing or two about martial arts and/or boxing like Chuck Norris, Joe Lewis and others. I can only go by their accounts.
-
08-24-2006, 01:54 PM #51
I'm just trying to put things in perspective. Watching ufc 3 and 4 showed me how little people knew of fighting back then. If you watch these "martial arts masters" fight, even an amateur like me can pick apart the things they are doing wrong. Most of the fights were a joke. When royce faught severn he was going for a triangle and the announcers were like "he can't do anything with thatt because the arm is stuck in there he needs to get that arm out to choke him". Then he ends up choking him out.
I think bruce lee and royce gracie are a good comparison. They were both smaller guys with unique styles, and both walked through most competition in an impressive fashion. Everyone thought royce was the ****, just like they think lee is, and we all know royce isn't unstoppable. At least not these days.
-
08-24-2006, 02:05 PM #52
-
-
08-24-2006, 02:50 PM #53
Bruce wasnt perfect but he was extremely innovative. The world did not have the kind of communication between continents like it did now. Networking now VS 40 years ago is huge. People train with top submission masters, kick boxers and Olympic wrestlers like its nothing. That didnt happen as common back in the day, if at all. As far as those days were concerned, Bruce was the f***ing man. Hands down.
I read somewhere that he wanted to start MMA style fighting and make it really popular like boxing. Cant remember where this was but my friend has tons of Bruce Lee books. Very interesting stuff. But while I have enormous respect for Bruce, I know that theres no way in hell that he could tear apart someone like Fedor. Thats just crazy talk. I wouldnt ever want to see it, but Fedor would probably tie Bruces noodle arms around his neck and choke him out
People like Bruce and Royce (good comparison, I agree) would whoop ass in a street fight. JKD and BJJ are all about taking people down WITHOUT getting your ass handed to yourself, granted BJJ does have a ton more grappling than JKD. JKD and JFGF werent developed to fight someone for points in a ring or cage. It was to FSU and do it without loosing your life if I understand correctly.
As a big Bruce fan, I want to say that this isnt a fair comparison. But Ill admit that he would very likely get his ass handed unless he was gouging out some eyes and busting up nuts (or got very lucky. Anything can happen in a fight). But even with my bias aside, its still not a fair comparison and its only going to lead to more arguments. Looks like thats already begun lol. Ive seen this topic argued to the death on countless forums now.
-
08-24-2006, 02:53 PM #54
-
08-24-2006, 03:05 PM #55
Anyone who thinks Bruce Lee could take a MMA in any major Org. Is greatly mistaken and is stuck in a movie driven hype land. Bruce Lee for his time was a pineer and deserve's respect for realizing the gap in TMA's before most did. Unforunaitly he wasnt around when the ground game devopled and when he sparred Gene Labell is was quickly emobilized. After seeing the power of grappling he entered his son in judo under Gene. For his day and age, he was a good fighter and a good actor. But comparing him to proffesional athlets today is like comparing a Hand gun to a M60.
Hopefully this puts this in perspective for the thread starter.
Also i'm impressed with alot of the educated answer's as usually this type of thread attract's a bunch of NERD's who are movie / kung fu fanatics.
And of course you know what they think (rolleyes)
-
08-24-2006, 03:41 PM #56
i have to say that it would be interesting to see who can shoot and take bruce down. he was one fast mofo. he was faster with his feet than a lot of fighters are with their hands. i bet he would have a killer sprawl. he was fast, accurate and powerful for a guy his size. let's not forget he would be competing in his weight class.
my 2 cents...
-
-
08-24-2006, 03:48 PM #57
-
08-24-2006, 03:58 PM #58
-
08-24-2006, 03:59 PM #59
-
08-24-2006, 04:03 PM #60
Bookmarks