Reply
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Registered User matty_2k6's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 91
    Rep Power: 218
    matty_2k6 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    matty_2k6 is offline

    Arrow is it true smith machine wont add much mass from doing bench press???

    as it says above^^ i like doing bench on the smith machine simply because i find i have more control but is it true that using it wont add as much mass as just doing a regular bench with barbell, no flaming or nothing plz.
    "Tough Times Don't Last, But Tough People Do"
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    C21H30O2 WCC's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2006
    Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 34
    Posts: 5,910
    Rep Power: 638
    WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250) WCC has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    WCC is offline
    normal barbell bench press is better, yes. it involves stabiliser muscles, whereas the smith machine doesn't. the smith machine can also create imbalances, since you can easily work harder on one side than the other.
    with a barbell, this won't happen - if you push harder on one side, the bar will lean to one side. so barbell bench can add more mass, and there's less risk of creating imbalances.

    dumbell bench is even better for mass, because stabilisers are used even more. i do 3 types of bench press; decline, flat and incline. i use dumbells for 2 of them and the smith machine for one of them, to alternate between them.

    i like to use the smith machine for close-grip bench presses; i do these for triceps, and i find it helps me isolate them a lot better.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User matty_2k6's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Age: 35
    Posts: 91
    Rep Power: 218
    matty_2k6 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    matty_2k6 is offline
    i might try DB press then instead of smith machine press thnx. and i also do close grip bench on the smith machine. thnx for the advice.
    "Tough Times Don't Last, But Tough People Do"
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PAmos wannabe's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: UK, england
    Posts: 1,157
    Rep Power: 0
    PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500) PAmos wannabe is not very helpful. (-500)
    PAmos wannabe is offline
    The amount of mass you add is dependant upon calorie consumption.vs.calorie expenditure.

    The exercises provide muscle stimulation to ensure that a good amount of this "mass" is muscle.

    Due to the smith machine controlling the path of the bar fewer muscles are recruited as stabilizers, resulting in less stimulation than a freeweight barbell.

    "You don't regret the things you did... you regret the things you didn't do"

    "very seldom do the lambs slaughter the butcher"
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Thin, Soft, Loose Lintford's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 5,030
    Rep Power: 3071
    Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Lintford is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Lintford is offline
    This argument is the reason my gym has a free weight smith, you can hook the weight on, yet the path is less controlled.
    but who was lift
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User BattleHymns's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Posts: 1,240
    Rep Power: 442
    BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50) BattleHymns will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    BattleHymns is offline
    smiths are good for shrugs =d
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User Trini_Boi's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: United States
    Posts: 504
    Rep Power: 397
    Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50) Trini_Boi will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Trini_Boi is offline
    Originally Posted by matty_2k6
    as it says above^^ i like doing bench on the smith machine simply because i find i have more control but is it true that using it wont add as much mass as just doing a regular bench with barbell, no flaming or nothing plz.
    yea its true like everybody else said b4 me. you don't use your stabilizer muscles as much. i think smith machine is good for getting use to an exercise rather than using it regularly on one. for example i used the smith to bench press and to do squats b4 i started doing it free weight. it kind of gets your muscles used to the motion.
    advertising not permitted
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User TBW's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 299
    Rep Power: 220
    TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) TBW has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    TBW is offline
    I never touch the smith machine for flat bench, not many people do in the gyms I have used. If you want more control just drop the weight a bit. Hope you reliase that its likely your smith bar will weigh less than the bar for the bench. In my current gym the smith bar is 15lb where as the olympic bar for benching is 40lb thats quite a bit of difference.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    WOOO milo's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2003
    Age: 37
    Posts: 1,175
    Rep Power: 813
    milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    milo is offline
    Originally Posted by PAmos wannabe
    The amount of mass you add is dependant upon calorie consumption.vs.calorie expenditure.

    The exercises provide muscle stimulation to ensure that a good amount of this "mass" is muscle.

    Due to the smith machine controlling the path of the bar fewer muscles are recruited as stabilizers, resulting in less stimulation than a freeweight barbell.

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    what he said.
    I hate stupid.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    WOOO milo's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2003
    Age: 37
    Posts: 1,175
    Rep Power: 813
    milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) milo is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    milo is offline
    Originally Posted by Twint
    I never touch the smith machine for flat bench, not many people do in the gyms I have used. If you want more control just drop the weight a bit. Hope you reliase that its likely your smith bar will weigh less than the bar for the bench. In my current gym the smith bar is 15lb where as the olympic bar for benching is 40lb thats quite a bit of difference.
    olympics are 45 I believe
    I hate stupid.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts