Nasser very similar to Markus Ruhl..

[latrell]

Recently I made the connection between Dorian and Mustafa, but Nasser and Markus are very similar IMHO. Both Blocky, lack a back (compared to their fronts), and huge!

Markus:


Nasser:


Nasser:


Markus:

[latrell]

Markus:


Nasser:


Both:

[HulkRage2006]

2 of my fave bodybuilders ever!

[andymuscle88]

They are somewhat similar in the way their bodies are put together but Nasser looks 100x better IMO.

[He-Man]

The big difference is SYNTHOL wasn't too popular back in nasser's day so he he's a real as it gets. Rulh is a synthol fulh (fool) LOL

Look at his rear delts, calves, bi's and yes - even his weak tri's in those pics? What's up with the European bb'ers and synthol?

[Bueford]

nasser looks way better than ruhl.much better porportion.nasser definitly has a back.the mustafa dorian comparison was good, but this is definitly a stretch

[elykdogg]

Originally Posted by He-Man

The big difference is SYNTHOL wasn't too popular back in nasser's day so he he's a real as it gets. Rulh is a synthol fulh (fool) LOL

Look at his rear delts, calves, bi's and yes - even his weak tri's in those pics? What's up with the European bb'ers and synthol?

jeez are you serious

ruhl has admitted using synthol on one of his shoulders (due to an injury) just to balance out his physique, and that was in the past

have you seen made in germany? synthol doesnt leg press 2000 lbs or shoulder press 500+ so gimme a break

[SemiShred]

Originally Posted by elykdogg

jeez are you serious

ruhl has admitted using synthol on one of his shoulders (due to an injury) just to balance out his physique, and that was in the past

have you seen made in germany? synthol doesnt leg press 2000 lbs or shoulder press 500+ so gimme a break

+1


i like ruhl more, allthough he obviously has alot of weak points, like his legs, lower back...

allthough his great smile makes up for it

[S.C.]

Originally Posted by He-Man

The big difference is SYNTHOL wasn't too popular back in nasser's day so he he's a real as it gets. Rulh is a synthol fulh (fool) LOL

Look at his rear delts, calves, bi's and yes - even his weak tri's in those pics? What's up with the European bb'ers and synthol?

HAHA! Are you serious? Nasser's downfall occured because of his synthol usage. It was rediculous.

[latrell]

this is why nasser never won:

nasser:


dorian:


dorians relaxed back even owns nassers.

[Anji]

... no man, Markus Ruhl very similar to Nasser its the correct way!!!

Nasser its the original

About the backs, i love Nasser but i need to agree Dorian Backs are the best of bodybuilding history, no debut...

Props

[jonbodin]

How about those hamstrings & calves in that Nasser pic!

[Slucha]

Originally Posted by He-Man

Look at his rear delts, calves, bi's and yes - even his weak tri's in those pics? What's up with the European bb'ers and synthol?

Yeah so many european bb's taking synthol....or ,maybe so many americans cannot get over the fact that they are getting owned from some european bb's on certain bodyparts and cry "synthol".

if there is some synthol in Rühl's rear delts then Cutler has a full oil barrel in his.
In his calves... wow that's a new one....i think you forgot his lats and upper chest, right...
And even in his weak triceps. Then why are his triceps still small? Where did you get that from. Ever heard of something called a muscle tear??

And when did Markus admit to taking Synthol in one of his shoulders???

It's pathetic that when somebody has a outstanding bodypart it's assumed it's synthol.
Lets see Rühl has outstanding biceps, chest, shoulders and good calves. Of course all synthol!!! Arnold Schwarzenegger had outstanding biceps, chest and calves. Woahh now we know from whom Markus learned how to shoot synthol so good.

And his legs and lower back being a weak point and not having a huge back???
Are you ****ing kidding me. His legs a enormous and his back is huge. He just lacks detail because he doesn't seem to be able to get it dry. Have you seen the pics from muscletime where Rühl poses wearing blue pants I think. He is showing a amazing x-mas tree because he finally was able to get it dry once.



So stop the hating.

[drew]

wow, those are some good nasser pics.

nasser actually has some sick calves. Find a shot of him in shorts and they are almost as obvious as matazzro's (sp?)

and ruhl isnt synthol filled. A few years ago he was peaking and placing well. He was cut and dry and you could see every cut in his arms and shoulders. When he peaks, you can tell he is all muscle. But he has a hard time peaking as most do.

[Big B]

Originally Posted by andymuscle88

They are somewhat similar in the way their bodies are put together but Nasser looks 100x better IMO.

damn straight. Nasser OWNS. He should have at least 2 "O" titles.

[stealth_swimmer]

Nasser and Rhul definitely. Dorian and Mustaffa? Not even. Dorian had a super thick and wide back and he didn't have legs that overpowered the rest of his body. Although I'm a big Mustaffa fan, he has things he needs to fix.

[Uriel_da_man]

Originally Posted by He-Man

The big difference is SYNTHOL wasn't too popular back in nasser's day so he he's a real as it gets. Rulh is a synthol fulh (fool) LOL

Look at his rear delts, calves, bi's and yes - even his weak tri's in those pics? What's up with the European bb'ers and synthol?

God I'm getting tired of retards...

[Uriel_da_man]

They both have lots of mass but the similarities end there IMHO. Nasser has rounder bellies and deeper cuts while Ruhl is sheer mass, Ruhl is the definition of mass monster.

And I still can't get why you guys keep saying they had bad backs. Was Nasser's back inferior to Dorian's? Yes, BUT YOU'RE COMPARING HIM TO THE BEST BACK IN THE BUSINESS FOR PETE'S SAKE! Besides, back was the ONLY thing (well, calves too) he beat Nasser on. Chest, shoulders, arms, thighs, Nasser was bigger all over.

[farmerswalk]

Originally Posted by Uriel_da_man

They both have lots of mass but the similarities end there IMHO. Nasser has rounder bellies and deeper cuts while Ruhl is sheer mass, Ruhl is the definition of mass monster.

And I still can't get why you guys keep saying they had bad backs. Was Nasser's back inferior to Dorian's? Yes, BUT YOU'RE COMPARING HIM TO THE BEST BACK IN THE BUSINESS FOR PETE'S SAKE! Besides, back was the ONLY thing (well, calves too) he beat Nasser on. Chest, shoulders, arms, thighs, Nasser was bigger all over.

Nasser had incredible calves as well. And dont forget his symmetrical 8-pack. at 280 lbs! incredible. one of my favorites because everytime some ignorant fool starts with the BBer musclehead stereotype, i tell them about this top pro bodybuilder whos got 4 masters degrees and speaks several languages.

[Uriel_da_man]

Indeed, Nasser was muscle with plenty of brains, I think he was a teacher or something (imagine having him giving your classe )

[3lixer.]

I met nasser at a beach bar in San Diego a couple weeks ago. He lives here and works out at World Gym. And he is massive. Cool dude too. It was weird seeing somebody that huge in person.

[Oz Enhanced]

Ruhl looks better