wats the difference between natural bodybuilders and normal bodybuilders because all the naturals i know have no muscle and no fat there basicly skinny guys with sum definition ???
|
-
04-19-2006, 01:22 PM #1
the difference between natural and normal bbers
age : 18
height : 6'2''
weight : 308lbs
currently : cutting to 260
4 years at number 2!!
2006 will be different i promice - jay cutler
-
04-19-2006, 01:35 PM #2
-
04-19-2006, 04:48 PM #3
-
04-19-2006, 05:09 PM #4
-
-
04-19-2006, 05:16 PM #5
-
04-19-2006, 06:29 PM #6
- Join Date: Dec 2005
- Location: United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 388
- Rep Power: 392
Whats up with the question, are you implying that "normal" bbuilders use gear? Cuz if so, your couldn't be more wrong dude.
As for natural bbuilders, if they have halfway decent genetics, bust their a$$e$ in the gym, and have their diet and supps to point, natty's can and do acheive incredibly muscular and shredded physiques. I know plenty of natty's including myself that look much better then alotta dudes that take gear.
I can't stand lazy people who think that everyone with a great physique has to be taking gear, just because they can't admit that they don't have what it takes acheive it. So being the lazy punks they are, they just go for the easy way out (probley like everything else they do) and start off taking gear (without even knowing anything about it) and they still look like crap.
I'm not saying this about all dudes that take gear, just the lazy ones that are to afraid to work for results. There is a big difference from someone whose busted their a$$ for three or four or more years and have a great foundation, all other factors are in check, properly researched AAS, and just want to take it to the next level. Thats all good dude.
If you look like crap before gear, you'll just look like bigger crap on gear. If you already have established a great natty physique, the gear will enhance, magnify, and flourish it, and definetly take it to the next level.
-
04-19-2006, 06:39 PM #7
-
04-19-2006, 06:50 PM #8
-
-
04-19-2006, 06:52 PM #9
-
04-19-2006, 09:56 PM #10
-
04-19-2006, 10:34 PM #11
- Join Date: Oct 2001
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,600
- Rep Power: 72795
Originally Posted by Team Benchpress
I have been involved with natural bodybuilding for over 5 years now and help some of the orgs with their banned substances list. You need to not comment on things that you are completely ignorant about.
As far as saying there are no impressive natural bodybuilders... I beg to differ
-
04-20-2006, 04:37 AM #12
- Join Date: Jan 2004
- Location: Oklahoma, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 6,182
- Rep Power: 5388
Originally Posted by str8flexedTEAM NORTON
The"Outwork" mindset changed my entire life, perhaps it can help you as well
Muscle Hypertrophy occurs independent of exercise intensity
-
-
04-20-2006, 04:53 AM #13
-
04-20-2006, 05:13 AM #14
-
04-20-2006, 06:30 AM #15
- Join Date: Jan 2004
- Location: Oklahoma, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 6,182
- Rep Power: 5388
Originally Posted by tl1kr
http://www.ocbbodybuilding.com/BannedSubstances.htmTEAM NORTON
The"Outwork" mindset changed my entire life, perhaps it can help you as well
Muscle Hypertrophy occurs independent of exercise intensity
-
04-20-2006, 06:54 AM #16
the difference between natural and regular bodybuilders is that natural bodybuilders rely on substances that have not been banned as was said in a post above.
but there are some very big natural guys out there. im a natural and competiting in my first show this saturday. its a regular show as there are no natural federations in ireland. as far as my size and conditioning goes, out of my gym im without doubt the best physique in there. i dont plan on winning the show but i aint comming last either thats for sure.
there are a few guys who are on gear in my gym, one of whom is impressive but not got what it takes to stand on stage. he is bigger than me, stronger than me but not as impressive looking in bodybuilding terms. genetics play the biggest role in my opinion not the drugs.
im sure we all know guys who are on gear and dont look good at all. if your body aint got it to begin with the gear aint going to supply you with the extras.
i read somewhere, could have been on these boards, if the top five naturals in the world were to have juiced from early in there training life, would they be the top five pro bodybuilders now?
-
-
04-20-2006, 07:10 AM #17
-
04-20-2006, 07:13 AM #18
-
04-20-2006, 07:15 AM #19
-
04-20-2006, 07:32 AM #20
-
-
04-20-2006, 07:38 AM #21
-
04-20-2006, 07:51 AM #22
-
04-20-2006, 07:58 AM #23Originally Posted by J_K
thats not rude at all mate.
some feds ask for 5 years clean, some ask for 10, and i think some ask for lifetime. but the tests wont show up anthing after as little as 3 months off gear i dont think. so in theory yes you could juice all you life, stop three months prior to a show and then enter and lie, easily done and ose be done. some places have lie dectetor systems in place but if you can beat it.....
-
04-20-2006, 08:01 AM #24
-
-
04-20-2006, 08:04 AM #25
-
04-20-2006, 08:04 AM #26Originally Posted by will-work4ANDRO
-
04-20-2006, 08:16 AM #27
-
04-20-2006, 08:18 AM #28
- Join Date: Oct 2001
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,600
- Rep Power: 72795
Originally Posted by carlow
first timer? you mean competing?
read my contest prep article http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/layne36.htm
-
-
04-20-2006, 08:23 AM #29
-
04-20-2006, 08:29 AM #30
Bookmarks