short,quick question
thanks
|
-
01-22-2008, 06:05 PM #1
-
01-22-2008, 07:34 PM #2
-
01-22-2008, 07:56 PM #3
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States
- Age: 49
- Posts: 8,606
- Rep Power: 8289
uh...any other row
DB row, cable row, etc.
You can make a row apparatus with an OLY bar and a double-D handle"Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret."
Training regularly but no progress?
You need one or more of these: more food, more weight, more reps or more rest.
Check out: www.muscleandbrawn.com
-
01-22-2008, 08:19 PM #4
-
-
01-22-2008, 09:09 PM #5
-
01-22-2008, 09:10 PM #6I may be 145 pounds...But I train like I'm 250.
I eat till I want to die, then I eat some more.
"Everybody want to be a bodybuilder, but dont nobody wanna lift no heavy ass weights" - Ronnie Coleman
"Focuus on a soulution not a problem" - Sheebee
August 07 - 130 pounds
January 08 - 145 pounds.
Sometime in the near future - 200 pounds
-
01-24-2008, 04:23 AM #7
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States
- Age: 49
- Posts: 8,606
- Rep Power: 8289
one of these: http://65.214.37.88/ts?t=2153834518101089342
plus a bar with one end weighted for lifting. put some weight on the other end to counter balance. straddle the bar, hook the handle under the bar and row."Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret."
Training regularly but no progress?
You need one or more of these: more food, more weight, more reps or more rest.
Check out: www.muscleandbrawn.com
-
01-24-2008, 05:58 AM #8
-
-
01-24-2008, 06:06 AM #9
-
01-24-2008, 07:22 AM #10
-
01-25-2008, 08:38 AM #11
-
01-25-2008, 09:16 AM #12
- Join Date: Dec 2005
- Location: Saratoga Springs, New York, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 2,145
- Rep Power: 773
But then, that seems a bit more like a substitute for a seated row than a T-bar, just because of hand/arm positioning. I do these, though, and they certaily bake the rhomboids. Good call.
To the original poster - have you tried these? I think they call them "Weighted Bench Pulls." They're great with dumbbells too.
~Forgiven~
My Training Log and Record of Adventures:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=441433851
-
-
01-26-2008, 01:33 PM #13
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 14,270
- Rep Power: 28156
I do ghetto t-bar rows, basically all u need is a bar and weight on one end and i leave a plate on the other end and just put ur hands on the bar and lift.
Meet PR's
565 dead(no belt)
465 squat(no belt)
315 bench(tendonitus)
Gym Pr's
545x2(dead)(no belt)
445 squat(no belt)
375 bench
230x5 standing military
Current location is Actually Cincinnati**
-
06-12-2011, 09:32 PM #14
I love this pic, not only is the bench great, but it's neat how her elbows are out so probably targets the upper back more when they're higher like that.
One thing I'm wondering about why we do these on incline benches as opposed to flat: could it be that most flat benches are just too low to the ground to fully stretch out our arms? I think a lot of benches are just designed for pressing and for safety reasons they keep them low, but for doing chest-supported rows, I think we want high benches to fully extend the arms.
If you look at this similar row for example, you can see to create a high flat bench they actually tilted an incline bench with the low end on top of another bench:
http://www.exrx.net/WeightExercises/...arDeltRow.html
Even that guy would have problems with larger plates though I think. Since you could get really strong at this movements (even though it's designed to limit lat involvement), I could see people eventually being able to row a couple 45s this way. But I think 45s would hit the ground so you'd need a reeeeally high bench.
Bookmarks