I have been tracking my macros for a little over a year now, experimenting to figure out what works and what doesn't for my body. I usually average a 37-40-23 (C,F,P) despite the dietary adjustments I make, but I've found that I can successfully lose about 2 pounds per week at that ratio with caloric restriction and strength training 4-6 days per week (upper/lower-body splits), sometimes throwing in 25 minutes or less of cardio 1-3 times per week.
When I diet I lose about 18% muscle - 1.8 pounds of muscle for every ten total lost. Whenever I try to gain muscle, it seems like I add some with a lot of fat (maybe the low protein ratio?) never breaking that 18% loss (I add 1.8 pounds or less of muscle for every 10 pounds gained). I'm happy with the weight I've gotten myself to (~190) and feel "muscular" but I'd like to have better definition. I've been down as low as 175 in the last six months, but that was also at a lower lean weight which left me feeling small.
Can anyone suggest a workout plan and/or dietary recommendations that would help to get me to about 12%BF at my current lean mass of 150#s? That would put me at an approx. total weight of 170.
Thanks.
|
Thread: Recomposition Assistance
-
04-18-2016, 09:32 PM #1
Recomposition Assistance
-
04-18-2016, 11:03 PM #2
-
04-19-2016, 05:53 AM #3
-
04-19-2016, 06:07 AM #4
-
-
04-19-2016, 11:36 AM #5
It's an averaged ratio over the last year (18%). The 1.8 was just for explaining purposes (18% = 1.8 pounds for every 10 total lost). I have experimented with tweaks to my diet and with my workouts (both structure and frequency) which has resulted in more muscle loss or less muscle loss, but I averaged all of that to result in a drop in lean mass of 7 pounds when I lost 38 total. Went from 30%BF at 225# to 16% at 176.
-
04-19-2016, 12:01 PM #6
Are you using some handheld bf% device or an online calculator? These methods can be wildly inaccurate.
Eat minimum of .8g/lb protein and .4g/lb fat, lift heavy, maintain adequate deficit. Read more here: Calculating Calories and Macronutrients
-
04-19-2016, 01:39 PM #7
Both, sort of. The readings were taken with a bio-electrical impedance scale, at the same time every month and at approximately the same hydration level. To account for error in the method (I think they're right some 80% of the time) I would also compare using the Navy's bodyfat calculation method, which always came within +/-2% of where the scale was reading.
That thread is very comprehensive; I'll read through it more later.
Similar Threads
-
Critique My Recomposition Diet Please!
By danieldeanrose in forum NutritionReplies: 20Last Post: 10-08-2015, 06:00 AM -
Real input/assistance for a real beginner
By acameron in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 21Last Post: 04-07-2006, 10:00 AM
Bookmarks