24/7 Customer Service 1-866-236-8417 Need Help? 1-866-236-8417

Reply
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Registered User GettingInShape2's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Age: 35
    Posts: 147
    Rep Power: 91
    GettingInShape2 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) GettingInShape2 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) GettingInShape2 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) GettingInShape2 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) GettingInShape2 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    GettingInShape2 is offline

    I cycled for 30 minutes and burned 200 calories. How the heck did that happen?

    In order to lose weight for my cardio, I run 3 miles per day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Tuesday and Thursday were my "off days" but I decided to do some light (real light) cardio by doing some cycling on the stationary bike.

    I was on it for about 30 minutes and was SHOCKED to see that I burned 200 calories. Keep in mind that the cycle level was really low and I didn't break a sweat. In fact, my breathing hardly changed. My heartbeat was about a 120.

    The reason why I am skeptical is because when I do my 3 mile jogs, I usually burn 250 calories in 30 minutes of running but during the run I am breathing pretty heavily and my legs are fatigued at the end of the run.

    Was it the machine's scales that were wrong? How did I lose 200 calories by cycling while breathing normal (as if I were sitting on a couch watching TV) yet I lose a little more than 200 calories by practically killing myself with sweat when running?

    Is low-intensity really that effective or was it the machine that was wrong?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Forever Cutting TheNormalMan's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2006
    Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age: 31
    Stats: 5'9", 200 lbs
    Posts: 5,442
    BodyPoints: 12729
    Rep Power: 3308
    TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) TheNormalMan is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Visit TheNormalMan's BodySpace
    TheNormalMan is offline
    Those numbers on the machine aren't entirely accurate. In terms of dropping fat, running is much more effective overall than cycling is. I only alternate cycling in with my program because I'm still too heavy to run for any real length of time. And with running, unless you weight like 100 pounds, if you're doing a decent pace, you should be burning more than 250 calories in a 30 minute session.
    Only Those Who Risk Going Too Far Can Possibly Find Out How Far One Can Go

    Forever Cutting (My Road to 10%):
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=163945981
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User Swaggydoo's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2004
    Location: West Yorks, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 1,681
    BodyPoints: 4845
    Rep Power: 223
    Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50) Swaggydoo will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Visit Swaggydoo's BodySpace
    Swaggydoo is offline
    Originally Posted by GettingInShape2 View Post
    In order to lose weight for my cardio, I run 3 miles per day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Tuesday and Thursday were my "off days" but I decided to do some light (real light) cardio by doing some cycling on the stationary bike.

    I was on it for about 30 minutes and was SHOCKED to see that I burned 200 calories. Keep in mind that the cycle level was really low and I didn't break a sweat. In fact, my breathing hardly changed. My heartbeat was about a 120.

    The reason why I am skeptical is because when I do my 3 mile jogs, I usually burn 250 calories in 30 minutes of running but during the run I am breathing pretty heavily and my legs are fatigued at the end of the run.

    Was it the machine's scales that were wrong? How did I lose 200 calories by cycling while breathing normal (as if I were sitting on a couch watching TV) yet I lose a little more than 200 calories by practically killing myself with sweat when running?

    Is low-intensity really that effective or was it the machine that was wrong?

    I think the real question is, how the heck do you only burn 250 cals jogging for 30 mins.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User Jules Verne's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2004
    Age: 42
    Posts: 5,050
    Rep Power: 1069
    Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Jules Verne is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    Jules Verne is offline
    Originally Posted by Swaggydoo View Post
    I think the real question is, how the heck do you only burn 250 cals jogging for 30 mins.
    Yea, how much do you weigh? It also depends on resting and max HR. 120 for me is not that low, for others it would be getting out of bed.

    200kcal, even for quite low intensity could be very reasonable, it might be a bit more even.

    usually for me low/med intensity burns about 10-13 kcal/minute.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Cutting Hotmoltenlava's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2006
    Stats: 6'3", 216 lbs
    Posts: 3,041
    BodyPoints: 22618
    Rep Power: 2837
    Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Hotmoltenlava is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Visit Hotmoltenlava's BodySpace
    Hotmoltenlava is offline
    Originally Posted by Swaggydoo View Post
    I think the real question is, how the heck do you only burn 250 cals jogging for 30 mins.
    X2

    I burn in the realm of 600 cals, but that is at a medium-high pace. Are you getting that reading from a treadmill or a calculator?
    My Will Is Hot Molten Lava
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User Buggy166's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2007
    Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Age: 28
    Stats: 6'0", 195 lbs
    Posts: 9
    BodyPoints: 578
    Rep Power: 0
    Buggy166 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Visit Buggy166's BodySpace
    Buggy166 is offline
    i run on ellipticals for 60 minutes on a medium pace at level 8/20(just came back from 6 months off and xmas food..gotta take it slow)

    for me that burns, on the marchine, something just over 900 cals. and itll continue burning more than likely for a bit more totalling 1000 cals.

    point is machines give you approximations, never the actual numbers because we all have different body types.

    i prefer for example long distance running due to the way im built, im not a sprinter and i also lose less mucle by avoiding hiit...but at the same time i put in 3x the time required to run.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User Librarygorilla's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Age: 37
    Stats: 6'1", 260 lbs
    Posts: 185
    BodyPoints: 1603
    Rep Power: 97
    Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) Librarygorilla has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Visit Librarygorilla's BodySpace
    Librarygorilla is offline
    Those things on machines are, generally, wildly inaccurate. They are useful for gauging progress over time. If you burned 200 calories in half an hour when you used to do 150, you've made good progress.
    Reply With Quote

Reply

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts