OMFG!
Not this **** again.
You need compounds as a backbone of your split. You absolutely need iso's as a complement to those compounds.
|
-
12-30-2007, 07:53 PM #61
-
12-30-2007, 07:54 PM #62
- Join Date: May 2006
- Location: Texas: swimming in a way that you can't detect...
- Age: 36
- Posts: 46,471
- Rep Power: 19965
Exactly, but when going too heavy on rows you tend to sacrifice form(as with most lifts). Still, going as heavy as you possibly can, while still having good form is what one should strive for. In that case....there is not way that I'd get my arms to grow from that, and neither would a lot of people I know.
Would they stay about the same? Yes, because it takes VERY little to maintain a muscle once it's developed. I could stop doing rows and still maintain my biceps development with one or two sets of DB curls or BB curls a week. But getting them to grow is another story.
With proper form on back movements, your biceps simply are not stimulated much as the goal is to use the back as much as possible with minimal biceps involvement.
-
12-30-2007, 08:00 PM #63
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 29,703
- Rep Power: 32857
I'm gonna spell this out real clear cause its apparent you don't get it.... I am not saying not to do direct arm work. I am disagreeing with what you are saying, which is that people who rely on compounds for arms do so at the expense of other bodyparts. This is NOT true.
No **** your arms aren't hit as hard in full body compounds as they are with direct work..... nobody is arguing to the contrary.
FYI.... with your barbell lifts at what they are... you can't expect to get any appreciable arm development from them. If you're going to rely on compounds alone (which I am not advocating) you had better be moving some real weight. Rowing half your bodyweight is a far cry from rowing 1.5 times your bodyweight.http://youtube.com/user/Kiknskreem
-
12-30-2007, 08:14 PM #64
They haven't figured out yet that every competitive bodybuilder does direct arm work. Hmm, I wonder why? Instead of accepting that for optimal arm development you need to do isos they keep looking for a handful of exceptions to the rule with great genetics.
Sure you can build "big" arms without curls. But the chances of them being in proportion with everything else after years of training without direct work are pretty slim.
-
-
12-30-2007, 08:17 PM #65
Yep, a back exercise can build the biceps. But it's still a back exercise and will work the back more. Eventually you have to have arm exercises to build them at an equal pace (they can handle more too because they're smaller muscles, so usually people do and equal amount of work for back and biceps so the biceps are getting more work)
-
12-30-2007, 08:25 PM #66
-
12-30-2007, 09:01 PM #67
- Join Date: Aug 2005
- Location: Cougar Hunting, United States Virgin Islands
- Age: 43
- Posts: 7,192
- Rep Power: 26950
/HIT Jedi on
I find your lack of faith disturbing...
/HIT Jedi off
This is the crux of it. When you're 150 pounds soaking wet, your arms will "blow the f*ck up" no matter what you do.
Chris earlier in this thread is a prime example of a high bicep insertion which lends itself to a genetically awesome peak that looks huge when flexed but deflates like a balloon when he relaxes. How do I know? 'Cause I used to be the same way Once I added MORE direct arm work (specifically higher-rep incline curls), the difference is no longer quite as pronounced as it once was.LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO BE SMALL
"tofurkey? tof*ck yourself" ~ W8
Check out my journal (currently on hold): http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=7096271
-
12-30-2007, 09:19 PM #68
-
-
12-30-2007, 09:26 PM #69
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Location: Down Under (the bar!)
- Age: 52
- Posts: 5,779
- Rep Power: 5498
And so is winning the lottery, because that is exactly what it is like, winning the lottery.
Some people can build great bi's simply due to genetics. For the VAST MAJORITY (ie 99.999999% of people on this forum), need direct arm work and if you need to ask, then that includes YOU!You gotta love how sports will f*ck with ya, make you believe you can come back from an insurmountable deficit and then get kicked right in the nuts when you're almost there - Bluntdogg
-
12-30-2007, 10:39 PM #70
-
12-30-2007, 10:42 PM #71
-
12-30-2007, 10:44 PM #72
-
-
12-31-2007, 05:48 AM #73
Some genetically gifted individuals may develop impressive biceps without doing direct arm work but they will never know how far they could have gotten had they done direct bicep work.
Even the most genetically gifted among us can benefit from direct stimulation. It can only make them better.
True body building is all about shocking muscles from different angles and intensities to maximize the muscle's development for the best possible appearance that genetics will allow.
-
12-31-2007, 06:06 AM #74
-
12-31-2007, 06:18 AM #75
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Discussing relevant exercises
- Posts: 17,825
- Rep Power: 37608
-
12-31-2007, 08:15 AM #76
-
-
12-31-2007, 08:18 AM #77
-
12-31-2007, 08:20 AM #78
-
12-31-2007, 08:23 AM #79
-
12-31-2007, 08:24 AM #80
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Discussing relevant exercises
- Posts: 17,825
- Rep Power: 37608
OH WAIT!
Some other posts:
Best strength exercise:
Chest Exercises:
How to get abs:
Suggest lower back exercises:
Wow, strong parrot.
Dom and IM1 are right. This is dangerous.
The rest of your posts are in the "Gay hate" thread and "insecure dating" thread.oh and gecko that link did not contain answers only the search page - swiftness_02
The foods that trigger ketosis are high in carbs, not sugars - michaeldude
-
-
12-31-2007, 08:26 AM #81
-
12-31-2007, 08:30 AM #82
-
12-31-2007, 08:46 AM #83
-
12-31-2007, 08:53 AM #84
- Join Date: Aug 2005
- Location: District Of Columbia, United States
- Posts: 26,327
- Rep Power: 35173
The gymnastics fellow needs to:
1. Stop posting gymnastics advice on a bodybuilding website. As impressive as it is, it's inappropriate for this forum.
2. Visit this forum to satisfy your needs in that field.Bodybuilding is 60% training and 50% diet. Yes that adds up to 110%, because that's what you should be giving it. Change the inside, and the physique will follow.
-
-
12-31-2007, 08:56 AM #85
-
12-31-2007, 08:56 AM #86
-
12-31-2007, 09:36 AM #87
Whenever I get confused about how to train, I ask an elite level olympic gymnast with genetics 1000X better than me. When that doesn't work, I ask a geared up sprinter...........
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
******** TRAP BAR BOARD REP*******
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
___________________________________
---*No Hymen No Diamond Crew*---
-
12-31-2007, 09:39 AM #88
-
-
12-31-2007, 09:42 AM #89
-
12-31-2007, 09:45 AM #90
Bookmarks