Hi guys,
Not counting the genetically gifted, is it possible for a normal/below average trainee to get big arms without performing any isolation exercises or direct arm work at all?
Like a lot of people with small arms I am always drilling isolation exercises to no avail, so I wondered if it was worth taking an unconventional approach to arm training by not focusing on them at all. My plan is to just concentrate on big compound movements (bench, deads, squats, pullups, dips etc) and leave out arm isolation exercises like curls and tri extensions etc.
Does anyone here train like this, or know of anyone who does that has had good results?
|
Thread: Big Arms Without Direct Work?
-
11-22-2005, 06:45 AM #1
Big Arms Without Direct Work?
-
11-22-2005, 06:46 AM #2
I would credit the 'non-isolation but growth' to genetics. You can grow the biceps/triceps easily without isolations but I believe unless your freaky with genetics the growth will be slower.
of course you gotta eat alot too2014 Misc Raw Bench Press Contest winner in the 276lb+ 555lb lift @ ~280lbs
2014 Obtained goal of 600+ raw bench press. Shoulder also hates me.
2015 Lost 110 lbs and currently enjoy being healthy. Retired heavy bench press.
2016 Stay healthy? Help others?
2017 Staying Healthy
2018 Might Return To The Game
-
11-22-2005, 06:59 AM #3
Well i believe you can develop good upper body all together just from simple compoud exercises (bench, pullups, dips, military press). On pullups for example depending on how you do them you can make them a great bi exercise. Also the same goes for dips. They will get worked when doing compound movements, but not at the same extent. I only do two direct arm workouts plus compounds and i have 14.5 inch arms at 160 lbs. This isnt normal, but my arms tend to take over a lot of movements. Thats why i dont have the chest development i would like. I think the main thing is how you perform the exercise. For example when doing dips staying straight up will make it a direct tri exercise, while leaning forward will make it secondary arm workout. My suggestion would be to stick with compound movements and a couple isolations at the end.
I do 2 sets of straight bar curls for 8,6 and for tri's i do two sets of weighted dips for 10,8. These have done great for me i would suggest them to anyone who has trouble with arm growth.Sometimes you have to see the bottom before you reach the top
R.I.P.
Josh aka Fingers
Steve P.
Joe G.
Tiffany G.
Josh B.
Steve Irwin (ultimate alpha)
-
11-22-2005, 09:13 AM #4
- Join Date: Feb 2005
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 7,479
- Rep Power: 3966
I think that when you're just starting to train, direct arm work should be kept to a minimum, but after a while isos need to be added to stimulate the muscles adequately to inspire growth. Some people claim to not have to do it, but if I did no direct arm work, mine wouldn't be growing.
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
-
-
11-22-2005, 09:24 AM #5
I have small arms that often seem out of proportion with my chest and back growth. I am not overly concerned with aesthetics, focusing more on strength and bodyweight manipulation. I was doing a routine that basically was free of isolation movements, so my arm work came from deadlifts, chins, dips, and my pressing movements.
Just for kicks I started doing 1 set of curls to failure during all my workouts. Some days barbell, some days dumbell, others ez curl. Depends on where I am in the gym at the time. I keep them strict and use a weight that I can rep at least 8 times and no more than 15 or so.
I am happy with the results.
-
11-22-2005, 09:51 AM #6
- Join Date: Sep 2005
- Location: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Age: 45
- Posts: 2,171
- Rep Power: 9587
Originally Posted by John700*Someday I want to meet this "Everyone," he seems to have written so very much, yet all of it is wrong.
*Nature is the master of design, and knowledge is the master of nature.
*Uncertainty is the seed of all knowledge - it is the catalyst of investigation
-
11-22-2005, 10:54 AM #7
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Provo, Utah, United States
- Age: 50
- Posts: 254
- Rep Power: 228
My arms grow like weeds compared to my chest and back. I've considered cutting out all direct arm work since my biceps and triceps are stimulated indirectly with chest, back, and delt work.
"He who would accomplish little need sacrifice little; he who would achieve much must sacrifice much. He who would attain highly must sacrifice greatly."
-James Allen
-
11-22-2005, 12:13 PM #8Originally Posted by darklight79
-
-
11-22-2005, 12:21 PM #9
-
11-22-2005, 12:29 PM #10
Give it a shot.
Personally, I just spent around 13 months w/o any direct arm work. Of course, I did weighted dips, heavy rows, weighted pull-ups, etc. But, have just recently incorporated direct arm work to see if it helps much. I am 6'4" and presently have bulked to 261 (will continue until Feb). My biceps did not grow much at all even w/ the bodyweight gain (as compared to pretty much everything else), triceps grew nicely though......I have thought that my biceps would have grown a bit more during that time period had I not used a thumbless grip on all rows and chins, but time will tell I suppose.
I think no direct work at least for spells in a year or 6 month intervals are a great idea, but my biceps just will not grow at the pace of everything else without direct work now and again. (maybe my biceps just won't grow much period). Hope this helps at least somewhat.
-
11-22-2005, 01:31 PM #11
-
11-22-2005, 01:41 PM #12Originally Posted by John700
Anyway, during the break, I worked on a three day split, chest back and legs. My arms might have grown a bit, but it was not noticeable. I recently switched up my routine, to include a day strictly for shoulders. I also started training arms again, with tris after chest and bis after back. My arm growth has never been better. I attribute this burst in growth to the fact that I took time off from direct arm training. So in effect, indirect arm training had a good indirect effect on my arms.
Just a note: you also should figure out how best to train your arms directly when you choose to hit them directly. That sounds funny, here's what I mean. Do you want to give them their own day, or do you want to train them after a large muscle group? I used to give them their own day, but now that I realize that they need more recovery time, I add them in at the end of other workouts.
-
-
11-22-2005, 02:03 PM #13
-
11-22-2005, 03:18 PM #14
My arms are my best bodypart.
Sometimes they get out of proportion.
So I STOP doing direct arm work. But I continue to do compounds like DB presses, hammer chins, rows, squats, etc.
Now, since I have good arm genetics, and I am doing compounds only, by the "compounds only argument", shouldn't they get BIGGER, not SMALLER? But that is not what happens.
I have yet to see the guy with TRULY big impressive arms that doesn't train them directly.
I am not saying "do 300 sets for bis", but I am saying train them directly.
-
11-22-2005, 03:48 PM #15
Worked for me.
Take this advice with a grain of salt. I'm a pipsqueak, I admit it -- my diet has been **** for years but I know my training works because I still make gains.
Anyway, I'm 155lbs, 13%bf, 14" arms. I don't train arms at all. The comment the guy made above me is funny -- 12 pullups in one set is my max currently.
Anyway, my back workout is quick and brutal. Three sets of chins, three sets of barbell rows, and three sets of deadlifts, all 6-8 reps.
Now tell me that curling 30 pounds is going to hit your biceps harder than a 150lb barbell row. Seriously, get real.
P.S. no need to give me **** about the diet -- I'm turning it all around as of this evening when I hit the grocery store!!I'm too cool for a signature.
Wait...
-
11-22-2005, 04:01 PM #16Originally Posted by Bucket of Speed
Resistance doesn't matter. Targeted resistance does.
One, if you are rowing 150, you should be curling more than 30.
But, to illustrate, does a 400 pound calf raise translate to more arm size than a 30 pound curl? Of course not. Why? Because the target is totally different.
Ok, different example. If weight is the prime factor, then why do FULL squats build more size than HALF squats? You can use more weight on the half squats.
See my point? It is TARGETED resistance.
BB curls and Skulls build size, make no mistake. The arms recover quickly and can take lots of work.
-
-
11-22-2005, 04:14 PM #17Originally Posted by Defiant1
Okay, now, you're welcome to your opinion, but I just think you're wrong. The arms vs. calf exercise is too obvious to even refute in detail. Your arms get no work at all so they won't grow. We all know that.
Full squats build more muscle because there is more focus on eccentric contraction which is where the vast majority of microtears are generated. It has nothing to do with "muscle targeting."
Maybe rows was a bad example. I'm still moving a ton more weight with my chins than I am with any curl, and the focus is far greater on the eccentric portion of the exercise, plus my back allows me to complete the concentric portion of the exercise better, thus allowing me more eccentric work, which is where the real magic happens.
So I still think direct arm work isn't necessary.
Then again, in bodybuilding, physiology differs vastly from person-to-person, so your mileage may vary.I'm too cool for a signature.
Wait...
-
11-22-2005, 04:40 PM #18
-
11-22-2005, 04:49 PM #19
-
11-22-2005, 06:05 PM #20
I know this isnt a debate, but I would prefer chest growth over arm growth why? imagine huge arms with a puny chest...it just does not work. Same goes both ways but I think the the smaller arms look a little more normal with a bgiger chest.
I need to gain mass, and start pushing some mad weights - Check out my journal!
-
-
11-22-2005, 06:06 PM #21Originally Posted by Bucket of Speed
Full squats build more muscle because there is more focus on eccentric contraction which is where the vast majority of microtears are generated. It has nothing to do with "muscle targeting."
First, I'm not really following your explanation, though I know what the terms mean. That is a nice way of saying it is not correct. Eccentric or concentric, it would still have to be targeted, right? Actually, what you are saying is not TOTALLY incorrect but way oversimplified. A full squat offers no more eccentric difference than it does a concentric difference to a half squat, and more resistance can be used.
Maybe rows was a bad example. I'm still moving a ton more weight with my chins than I am with any curl, and the focus is far greater on the eccentric portion of the exercise, plus my back allows me to complete the concentric portion of the exercise better, thus allowing me more eccentric work, which is where the real magic happens.
Again, look at the real world results. Where is the big arm guy who does no direct work?
-
11-22-2005, 06:08 PM #22
-
11-22-2005, 06:35 PM #23
-
11-22-2005, 07:01 PM #24Originally Posted by John700
There's nothing wrong with direct arm training, so long as it doesn't compromise the most important aspects of your routine IMO. I mean there are guys dedicating an entire workout to arms and therefore doing the most important back and chest exercises like rows and presses once a week. If you asked them why they'd probably say they have no room in their schedule because they need a couple of days either side of the arm workout for recovery. See the problem?
-
-
11-22-2005, 07:17 PM #25Originally Posted by Defiant1
Just stick with compound only exercises until your arms plateau. Then you can start adding direct training. That's why people that have huge arms like Defiant1 need to add direct arm work or they'll lose arm size. Newbies on the otherhand can add much size with only compounds to a certain point at which they must add direct arm training."The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
-
11-22-2005, 07:19 PM #26Originally Posted by Worldwide
Originally Posted by Defiant1Last edited by J.L.C.; 11-22-2005 at 07:27 PM.
-
11-22-2005, 11:11 PM #27
12 bw pullups to a <180 pound man is much easier than a 220+ pound man regardless if he's all muscle or not.
That makes me wonder how many pullups can Ronnie do ? rofl2014 Misc Raw Bench Press Contest winner in the 276lb+ 555lb lift @ ~280lbs
2014 Obtained goal of 600+ raw bench press. Shoulder also hates me.
2015 Lost 110 lbs and currently enjoy being healthy. Retired heavy bench press.
2016 Stay healthy? Help others?
2017 Staying Healthy
2018 Might Return To The Game
-
11-23-2005, 01:38 AM #28
-
-
11-23-2005, 01:40 AM #29
-
11-23-2005, 01:48 AM #30Originally Posted by J.L.C.
We'll have half the people do it your way, and I'll have the other half doing lying extensions and barbell curls AND dips/pullups-we'll see who wins.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
******** TRAP BAR BOARD REP*******
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
___________________________________
---*No Hymen No Diamond Crew*---
Bookmarks