Ok, well I understand this is going to vary ALOT between people bc the exercises stress different parts of the body to some extent but I was just curious as to what some GENERAL ratios/coefficients people see in WORKING weights(a weight at which you can rep say 6-8 reps with excellent technique) of the two lifts.
For instance if you can work with 275 lbs on the FS and 380lbs on the back squat I guess the coefficient would be .72 or something between the two.
Im asking bc I havent performed a back squat for awhile now other than some really light work...and im wondering generally where I would be with a ~225lbs front squat for 6-8 reps.
When I last tested after first doing back squats for a few months I worked up to 260lbs for 5 reps(~3 months ago)...but I think I had some more in me. The other day I was doing(that is performing front squats) @ 220lbs for 6-7 reps and decent rep speed and the guy who was watching me and who is fairly knowledgeable when asked thought I could work with 3 plates for 5s on backsquats based on my Front squats which I thought was OVERLY optimistic.
Now im just confused but I dont have a day set aside for testing......
Worse comes to worse I guess ill start at 260lbs for 5's....I couldnt have actually gotten weaker in the backsquat while front squatting could I have>?
I mean im still basically a beginner so im assuming that isnt the case.
|
-
12-21-2007, 09:12 PM #1
Front Squat vs. Back squat (poundage ratio)
-
12-21-2007, 09:35 PM #2
unless you regularly train both your coefficient is gonna be way off due to an uncoordinated CNS and lack of practice in the lifts.
I did front squats with 225 today and felt really really off balance and just generally weak...but my back squat for a working set is like 385 right now....
I haven't done much front squatting b/c it puts too much stress on my knees, they just don't like going forward anymore, so my front squat is waaaay down. my best ever working set of front squats was 8sets of 5reps @315. I just don't train it much since I got hurt so it went bye bye.*Mods/CS will not, nor can they change your username, so don't ask*
*Mods/CS will not, nor can they mass delete your post history, so don't ask*
-
12-21-2007, 09:44 PM #3
-
12-22-2007, 12:25 AM #4
-
-
12-22-2007, 05:45 AM #5
You probably right....I was just curious to see generally where people were at one compared to the other.
Ill probably just start where I maxed out at 3 months ago...better to start too conservative than too aggressively on a linear program IMHO.\
p.s. Damn Isaku thats alot of weight/volume on front squats.....thats impressive sorry about the injury though.
-
12-22-2007, 05:47 AM #6
olympic lifters usually have about a front squat that's 80% of their back squat, but then again they train the front squat alot more, I'm about there, 245 x 1 front squat and 305 x 1 back squat, I also think it has to do with your form in either lift, if you do wide stance back squat PL style but do oly front squats you're going to have a lot more descrepency than if you were doing both oly style.
'Prior to the Department of Education, there was no illiteracy'
- Stizzel
-
12-22-2007, 06:44 AM #7
Yeah, im like a wannabee Olympic lifter with my squats sometimes...but sometimes I widen to an athletic stance just outside shoulder width.
I think alot of the difference between the two lifts would also be caused by a tendancy or lack thereof in forward lean in the back squat....if someone in coming way forward in the Bsquat they are going to have to more dramatically lessen the load in Fsquatting USUALLY.
-
12-22-2007, 09:24 AM #8
-
-
12-22-2007, 11:55 AM #9
-
12-22-2007, 12:34 PM #10
I've never maxxed out either, especially in competition with each other, but today I worked up to an easy 365x2 back squat and a 245 EDIT: POUNDSx5 front squat. I could have done more front squats, and I could have done 10-15 more on the back squat, but I was finished.
I front squat with a clean grip and with a stance as wide as my back squats, so I really don't know.Last edited by cjhannsz; 12-22-2007 at 01:59 PM.
-
12-22-2007, 12:45 PM #11
-
12-22-2007, 01:25 PM #12
-
-
12-22-2007, 01:59 PM #13
-
12-22-2007, 02:23 PM #14
-
12-22-2007, 02:57 PM #15
-
12-22-2007, 03:24 PM #16
personally
in my leg work out the other day i did
4 singles with 95% of my estimated max which was 375. i guessed my max at about 405. put on my belt and did a set of 5 with 375. so 5 sets total
then did front squats
225x8
245x6
275x3
275x3
then did 315 for a single all without a belt. i'd say my absolute max on front squats isnt more then 10 lbs heavier since 315 was a good hard rep
-
-
12-22-2007, 07:34 PM #17
-
12-30-2007, 01:59 PM #18
I think 80% is about right. I usually lift 275x5x3 and yesterday did front squats for the first time 185x8x2 without strength probs, only a bit awkward and uncomfortable on the wrists. I think after I get used to lift 225 will be about right and thats close to 80%. I'm not powerlifter(obvious) but I like the lift, my core was a bit sore.
-
12-30-2007, 02:03 PM #19
-
12-30-2007, 02:40 PM #20
It's all about balance and form. Barbell is in such an awkward position for front squat, it's hard just to stay upright. I can front squat 260, but can only back squat 315. Guess I'm just flexible.
PR's:
Bench: 300 lbs
Back Squat: 380 lbs
Clean and Jerk: 130 kg (286 lbs)
Snatch: 100 kg (220 lbs)
Deadlift: 5 x 345 lbs
-
-
12-30-2007, 05:30 PM #21
not to jak the thread, but woo hoo
after a 5x5 @ 390 back squat workout, I did a 3x3 front squat; 1st set at 275, 2nd set at 295, 3rd set at 315...
getting it back....
my newly acquired knee sleeves are really helping too; able to give me the lateral stability in my knee that I need what with my surgeries, but they aren't like using wraps.*Mods/CS will not, nor can they change your username, so don't ask*
*Mods/CS will not, nor can they mass delete your post history, so don't ask*
-
12-30-2007, 05:51 PM #22
I think the difference weight lifted is do to your back simply has bigger muscles to support alot more weight.
But, it depends on what your going for as Front Squats will help you with deadlifts and benchs because the lift static trains your shoulders and lower back(in the lumbar region of the spine)
-
12-30-2007, 05:55 PM #23
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 29,703
- Rep Power: 32857
The front squat also depends on the muscles of the back to support the weight.
The differences in weight used is due to both the mechanical disadvantage of the longer lever arm created by having the bar in the front of the body as opposed to one the back and the switch in emphasis of which muscle groups are called into play as a result of the differing back angle.http://youtube.com/user/Kiknskreem
Bookmarks