Yup I guess I better just go waste my time hitting with wood since it's never gonna get me anywhere.
I guess when scouts evaluate guys to see if they can handle wood, they don't know what they are doing either. Nobody cares if you can hit with metal. All they care is if you can hit with wood. If you don't know how you're screwed.
Seeing as summer/pro ball uses wood, I guess it makes sense to actually learn what you need to succeed at that level.
But you're right, we all should just swing metal because it gives so much more feedback and is far more telling whether or not you can hit than a wood bat.
|
Thread: Wood baseball bats
-
12-16-2007, 05:23 PM #31
-
12-16-2007, 06:56 PM #32
-
-
12-16-2007, 07:12 PM #33
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 992
- Rep Power: 223
You honestly took about zero of what I said and put it in there. You basically put a ton of things in there I didn't say like I said them.
Did I say it's a waste of time? No
Did I say scouts evaluate guys to see if they can handle metal? No
Do scouts evaluate how some kids hit with wood? Yes
You said nobody cares if you can hit with metal...are you serious?
Here's what I'm saying...hitting with metal and wood are completely different. If someone has a showcase coming up in which they have to use wood I would advise that person to take BP with wood. If they're taking batting practice before a game then I advise them use metal.I'm an athlete
-
12-16-2007, 07:25 PM #34
-
12-16-2007, 09:37 PM #35
-
12-16-2007, 09:39 PM #36
-
-
12-16-2007, 09:40 PM #37
-
12-17-2007, 09:59 AM #38
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 992
- Rep Power: 223
To finally answer the OP's question...
If you're going to get a wood bat, follow the advice of others and get one that has been treated to not break easily because if they get you a wood bat and you take one bad swing with it you could throw away $50. I've seen it happen, several times.
I'm an athlete
-
12-17-2007, 10:11 AM #39
-
12-17-2007, 12:33 PM #40
-
-
12-17-2007, 02:43 PM #41
-
12-18-2007, 02:08 PM #42
- Join Date: Jun 2006
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 6,107
- Rep Power: 4504
-
12-18-2007, 08:42 PM #43
-
12-18-2007, 11:24 PM #44
-
-
12-19-2007, 09:00 AM #45
-
12-19-2007, 06:41 PM #46
-
12-19-2007, 06:44 PM #47
-
12-20-2007, 12:16 PM #48
-
-
12-21-2007, 03:10 PM #49
-
12-21-2007, 04:29 PM #50
-
12-21-2007, 05:48 PM #51
- Join Date: Jun 2006
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 6,107
- Rep Power: 4504
No doubt man. Definitely end-weighted, thus the strength required for bringiing the barrel along the same swing plane is more on the bottom hand ("holding the barrel up") but I think that the "whip" it generates may add power to my swing metal and wood.
Definitely liking things so far. Same length, its a 33". I don't know about weight and have no way of measuring it either.
-
12-22-2007, 02:16 PM #52
I have a Demarini comp right now and it's great. I don't know what these guys are talking about saying the sweet spot doesn't feel the same because the Demarini sweet spot feels better than most woods I've swung.
Don't use your aluminum game bat in the cage, unless the cage uses hardballs, because if it uses those yellow balls they will dent your bat. I go with wood in the cage.
-
-
12-22-2007, 02:48 PM #53
-
12-22-2007, 08:54 PM #54
-
12-23-2007, 05:26 AM #55
- Join Date: Jun 2006
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 6,107
- Rep Power: 4504
I used that one time, it feels just like the nike bats if you've used those. It isn't weighted in the middle like the two piece bats, but more at the end, similar to wood. That's probably the reason, since so many college players hit with wood in the summer/have pro aspirations.
I believe the general consensus is balanced(generally two piece) bats are for the average hitter, and end-weighted(generally one piece) bats are for the power/distance hitter, but its certainly up to you and how they feel in cage/game.
-
12-23-2007, 10:06 PM #56
-
-
12-24-2007, 01:53 PM #57
-
12-24-2007, 02:38 PM #58
I think it's all BS. Yes, Demarini thinks that they can say "Oh our bats bend, more trampoline effect" and throw up some biased graph (with doctored results) and that will show their bats "superiority". Yes the Vexxum is a 2 piece model, in the bending mold.
I think they did the same thing with their wood bats. Obviously it is more resistant to breaking than a solid 1 piece wood, but the composite handle reflects their stand on bending bats are better, and trying to justify the 130$ price tag.
Glad you enjoy the maple. Stick with it.
-
12-24-2007, 10:46 PM #59
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Location: Colorado, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 2,125
- Rep Power: 332
My personal stick is
the solid black one. Its called a Sam Bat ... about $110 from baseball express very good and has not broke on me yet. I would say the best for under $50 is gonna be a Mizuno prostock. I've tried a lot of wood bats and this is my favorite for the price ($40 I believe). If you want something that is not gonna break though I would go with a composite because those things are practically unbreakable.=============================================
My Training Log:
new log soon!
=============================================
Bookmarks