Phil Heath 2003 pics!!!

[brettf2]

Are you trying to imply that Wofl's shoulders are a weakness? lol.

I'm not implying they are weak, read my post.

Boring06 said that heath was less balanced because his arms overshadowed the rest of his upper body and I was just pointing out that wolf's shoulders have the same effect.

Nobody in their right mind would think that heath's arms or wolf's shoulders are a weakness by themselves, but they both overshadow the rest of their physiques.

[flangmasterj]

Some comparisons. Don't give me **** about scale and lighting. Use your head.

[flangmasterj]

and a MM

[rocco421]

you say not to give you **** about scale, but when wolf's biggest strength is his width, scale is extremely important. these pictures do not do justice to wolfs significantly wider build, especially the most muscular.

[boring06]

I'm not implying they are weak, read my post.

Boring06 said that heath was less balanced because his arms overshadowed the rest of his upper body and I was just pointing out that wolf's shoulders have the same effect.

Nobody in their right mind would think that heath's arms or wolf's shoulders are a weakness by themselves, but they both overshadow the rest of their physiques.

I'd disagree about Wolf's shoulders overshadowing the rest of his upper body.

I do agree his calves need to come up a bit though.

[flangmasterj]

you say not to give you **** about scale, but when wolf's biggest strength is his width, scale is extremely important. these pictures do not do justice to wolfs significantly wider build, especially the most muscular.

For **** sake! Use your imagination!

We know Wolf is wider. We're not comparing width we're comparing the physique as a whole.

Merry Xmas mother ****ers!

[brettf2]

you say not to give you **** about scale, but when wolf's biggest strength is his width, scale is extremely important. these pictures do not do justice to wolfs significantly wider build, especially the most muscular.

They are at different shows. The lighting is different and thus detailed comparisons in conditioning and separation are hard to make, but these pictures give a general idea of how wolf and heath would compare.

You don't need perfectly scaled pictures to make legit comparisons between bodybuilders.

[baskam]

wolf vs. phil comparisons....

sorry to all you wolf lovers, but i have to give it to heath every time. let's see if wolf can match his conditioning at the O again...

[flangmasterj]

They are at different shows. The lighting is different and thus detailed comparisons in conditioning and separation are hard to make, but these pictures give a general idea of how wolf and heath would compare.

You don't need perfectly scaled pictures to make legit comparisons between bodybuilders.

Thank you brett.

[rocco421]

phil heath-dexter jackson with better arms
wolf-potential to be one of top 5 bodybuilders of all time

[flangmasterj]

phil heath-dexter jackson with better arms....

.....and calves. Dexter Jackson with better arms and calves = perfection.

Heath = Perfection.

Good call Rocco.

[rocco421]

.....and calves. Dexter Jackson with better arms and calves = perfection.

Heath = Perfection.

Good call Rocco.

how many O's does jackson have, ya thats right...

[themattlike]

well when they r on stage together it makes a big difference in terms of scale and lighting.wolf's crazy width is going to be very apparent standing next to the narrow heath, but then again heaths shape is going to make wolfs muscle bellies look not to good.

[Kiwi_]

and a MM

Not the best comparisons dude, I thought you were a graphic designer or something?

[flangmasterj]

Not the best comparisons dude, I thought you were a graphic designer or something?

They're doing the same pose? Come on man.

[gomez26]

]

im sure the wolf would envy those choppers

[DPNZ]

**** Heath's awesome.

[ThatArmyKid]

Some comparisons. Don't give me **** about scale and lighting. Use your head.

what up with wolfs abs?

[Dariusz K.]

what up with wolfs abs?

Not fully flexed.

[rocco421]

what up with wolfs abs?

you mean the injection sites?

[NewRelease55]

There's no denying both of these guys look incredible. It's a shame we have another 9 months or so till the Olympia.
Does anyone know if these two will meet on stage before then?

[rampagefc77]

wolfs back was the widest on the olympia stage. Heaths back is one of his worst bodyparts. The different when they each turn around and hit a lat spread would be huge.

I think heath has some of the best lines in the game, but with the added mass that could change (lets hope not). At this point i just dont see heath ahving the mass to keep up with wolf, and his proportions are still off.

[John Doe X]

omfg Phil's arms look retarded huge in this pic

Wonder what he's really got... 21's maybe?

On the Iron Age forum, the administrator Shawn Perine, wrote, "Phil told me his upper arm measures 21" at a bodyweight of 263 and a height of 5'9"


Baring in mind, that Phil competes around 215-220lbs, that's a loss of aprox 43-48 lbs, so take that excess fluid and fat away from his arm size with the weight loss, which could mean minus 1/2-1'' ?

Arm therefore roughly 20'' in contest shape

Does anyone else know what an additional 43-48 lbs would correspond to in additional inches on an arm?



This puts a lot of pros supposed measurements in perspective

[boring06]

On the Iron Age forum, the administrator Shawn Perine, wrote, "Phil told me his upper arm measures 21" at a bodyweight of 263 and a height of 5'9"


Baring in mind, that Phil competes around 215-220lbs, that's a loss of aprox 43-48 lbs, so take that excess fluid and fat away from his arm size with the weight loss, which could mean minus 1/2-1'' ?

Arm therefore roughly 20'' in contest shape

Does anyone else know what an additional 43-48 lbs would correspond to in additional inches on an arm?



This puts a lot of pros supposed measurements in perspective

Well it's hard to guess accurately, because obviously all that weight is not just in his arms, but a pretty good rule is one inch on your arms equals about 10 pounds of bodyweight.

[John Doe X]

Well it's hard to guess accurately, because obviously all that weight is not just in his arms, but a pretty good rule is one inch on your arms equals about 10 pounds of bodyweight.

that seems quite excessive to be honest, that would mean that if Phil had 21'' arms at 263lbs, then his arms would only be 17'' at contest time if we were to postulate that 10lbs = 1 inch arm diameter, given the 40 lb differential

[boring06]

that seems quite excessive to be honest, that would mean that if Phil had 21'' arms at 263lbs, then his arms would only be 17'' at contest time if we were to postulate that 10lbs = 1 inch arm diameter, given the 40 lb differential

Yes, but thats what I mean. The 40 pounds he lost is not just on his arms, but his entire body.

I'm guessing his arms are right between 19 and 20.

[woodsballa]

he was that small only 3 and a 1/2 ish years ago?

wow strong work ethic

fixed

[woodsballa]

Some comparisons. Don't give me **** about scale and lighting. Use your head.

I love the huge veins that come from Wolfs armpit into his arm. You can really see it on his right arm!

[DPNZ]

Heaths back is one of his worst bodyparts

Come again???

[DPNZ]

I love the huge veins that come from Wolfs armpit into his arm. You can really see it on his right arm!

That would be the left arm.