|
Thread: Any mormans here?
-
04-16-2008, 06:41 PM #31
-
04-16-2008, 10:35 PM #32
I'm technically still a mormon, BIC. Although I've only been a couple of times in the past two years and no longer believe. It's tough biting my tongue when family members or friends start talking about the church and I just want to get into an argument with them about it but know that it's not worth losing friends and family over. I respect their decisions although the overwhelming majority have never truly questioned whether it's true or not but it's tough when none of your family has arrived at the same conclusions as you have.
Is he now? Have you ever seriously questioned your faith? If you have, then I fully respect your decision but if he has looked into the church and come to a different conclusion than you, it's highly arrogant for you to say that just because he came to the conclusion that Joseph is a liar.Last edited by Li_Bai_Dantes; 04-16-2008 at 10:41 PM.
-
-
04-16-2008, 10:38 PM #33
-
04-16-2008, 10:41 PM #34
I thought it was fairly well established that he was a scammer when young.. ill tempered as a man, and extremely egotistical.. bad with money to boot -- doesn't change the good he did.
Plenty of Biblical time prophets were screwups. I'm starting to think it goes with the job."Sa souvraya niende misain ye ... I am lost in my own mind"
― Robert Jordan, A Memory of Light
For he cannot read his tombstone when he’s dead.
_██_
(ಠ_ృ)
-
04-17-2008, 09:45 AM #35
Ok, maybe he is not unaware, but he provided no reference as to why he believes that Joseph Smith was a liar or charlatan.
He never said he has been mormon or even looked into the church at all. He can have his opinion on the matter, but the fact remains that he is probably getting his info from anti-mormon, bigotry-laden websites and pastors who purposely distort the truth so as to confuse people.
I have heard every argument, story, etc. about Joseph Smith being a "liar or charlatan or blah blah blah" and every single one that I've heard or read of is unfounded or made up. At times it gets really amusing at how far some will go to distort the truth.Last edited by Macrobolic; 04-17-2008 at 09:54 AM.
"To close one's eyes will not ease another's pain" - Chinese Proverb
"An outdoor dog has an address, not a home" -unknown
Modern
Fitness
Forum
Go
There
Now
-
04-17-2008, 09:55 AM #36
This concerns me: http://www.jewishgen.org/InfoFiles/ldsagree.html
-
-
04-17-2008, 10:06 AM #37
The church stopped this practice after there were objections to it. Just to be clear, no living person had these rites performed. Only those who were deceased. It goes along with our belief of baptisms for the dead, like those practiced in biblical times (1 Corinthians 15:29-30).
Last edited by Macrobolic; 04-17-2008 at 10:11 AM.
"To close one's eyes will not ease another's pain" - Chinese Proverb
"An outdoor dog has an address, not a home" -unknown
Modern
Fitness
Forum
Go
There
Now
-
04-17-2008, 10:08 AM #38
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 4,626
- Rep Power: 628
Paul was a persecutor and murderer of Christians. David was a fornicator, murderer, and a liar. And Job was egotistical and a coward.
That doesn't change the fact that these men changed their ways, constantly sought repentance, and always tried to walk with God.
While I have very little knowledge about Joseph Smith or the factuality of his teachings, I do know that there are great examples to be taken away from people who stand up for what they believe in, especially (and in reality, only) when done in the name of right.
And one thing I certainly know is that there are a seemingly infinite amount of half-truths and lies about nearly all religions, especially with the advent of the internet. You must take EVERYTHING you read with a grain of salt.Matt Ryan is the truth.
There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe them. -George Orwell
I rape back (300+) (put 300+ in your comment)
R/P UPCC 4 LYFE
-
04-17-2008, 10:15 AM #39
There was actually a fairly recent contoversy over this because this was still being practiced. I think that baptizing dead Jews, especially Holocaust victims, is beyond disrespectful. I have no issue with Mormons practicing their religion so long as they show other religions respect.
http://www.rickross.com/reference/mormon/mormon152.html
-
04-17-2008, 10:17 AM #40
-
-
04-17-2008, 10:23 AM #41
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 4,442
- Rep Power: 6846
No. Your brother has been listening to LDS "oral traditions" that are not doctrines, but things added on to the doctrines by overzealous members. The Word of Wisdom, the Mormon dietary code, does not forbid anything with caffeine in it. The real "rule" is not eating/drinking/using coffee, tea, alcohol, and tobacco products.
"You will give the people an ideal to strive towards. They'll race behind you. They will stumble; they will fall. But, in time, they will join you in the sun. In time, you will help them accomplish wonders." Jor-El
---
Kris Gethin's Body By Design, pg. 43/44 (Yes, that s me)
-
04-17-2008, 10:29 AM #42
-
04-17-2008, 10:29 AM #43
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 4,442
- Rep Power: 6846
Doing temple work for the dead is part of their religion, an integral part, in fact. That is the reason with the LDS Church is so involved in genealogical research.
The Church itself did stop name extraction baptisms in 1995. What you are seeing is basically a conflict between Jewish LDS converts (and a few overzealous members) and other Jews. The Church does not use a central cleaing house to approve names for temple work (at least yet. Such a computer system is in development.) Individual members submit who they wish, even though they are supposed to limit to family members.
It becomes more problematic when Jewish converts submit their family names. Other Jews take offense to seeing the names on the IGI, but when it is Jewish converts, submitting the names of their own family members, the Church will do nothing to stop it ever, as long as familial relationships are provable. It is no different than when I submitted the names of my Protestant ancestors when I was LDS."You will give the people an ideal to strive towards. They'll race behind you. They will stumble; they will fall. But, in time, they will join you in the sun. In time, you will help them accomplish wonders." Jor-El
---
Kris Gethin's Body By Design, pg. 43/44 (Yes, that s me)
-
04-17-2008, 10:37 AM #44
-
-
04-17-2008, 10:39 AM #45
-
04-17-2008, 10:40 AM #46
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 4,442
- Rep Power: 6846
While I agree, some members are again overzealous in the application. Caffeine is in aspirin and chocolate. Using that interpretation, anything can be forbidden, as potentially addictive. I've seen members propound veganism based on the word or wisdom. Several LDS leaders have cautioned against that interpretation, instead sicking to what they have taught it means in official Church publications.
"You will give the people an ideal to strive towards. They'll race behind you. They will stumble; they will fall. But, in time, they will join you in the sun. In time, you will help them accomplish wonders." Jor-El
---
Kris Gethin's Body By Design, pg. 43/44 (Yes, that s me)
-
04-17-2008, 10:51 AM #47
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: Arizona, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 191
- Rep Power: 228
I find more overzealous LDS members in the Provo area than anywhere else. It has a massive bubble there. Most of those members haven't truly live outside of that bubble to really appreciate life and grow up. And because of that, to me, many lack a "common sense" to the interpretation to those teachings.
-
04-17-2008, 10:54 AM #48
-
-
04-17-2008, 11:24 AM #49
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 4,442
- Rep Power: 6846
The specific reasons why have to do with the LDS temple ceremonies. Many LDS are very offended at having those things discussed in a public forum. So, I have always respected their beliefs and not done so, beyond generalities.
The easiest way for you to think about is to think of a Catholic priest or nun. These people wear clerical clothing, vestments, a habit, as an outward symbol of office and a reminder to themselves of the promises they have made to the Church and to their God and the blessings they receive if faithful to them.
The LDS temple garment is a similar reminder to wearer of the promises they have made in the temple and the blessings they will receive if they are faithful to them."You will give the people an ideal to strive towards. They'll race behind you. They will stumble; they will fall. But, in time, they will join you in the sun. In time, you will help them accomplish wonders." Jor-El
---
Kris Gethin's Body By Design, pg. 43/44 (Yes, that s me)
-
04-17-2008, 11:29 AM #50
-
04-17-2008, 02:22 PM #51
-
04-17-2008, 03:13 PM #52
-
-
04-17-2008, 04:05 PM #53
-
04-17-2008, 04:09 PM #54
-
04-17-2008, 04:12 PM #55
-
04-17-2008, 04:13 PM #56
-
-
04-17-2008, 04:18 PM #57
-
04-17-2008, 04:57 PM #58
I personally don't see the LDS baptizing dead Jews as disrespectful or wrong..
Nobody is 'forcing' them to accept anything. If they want to accept it.. they can. If not.. they aren't forced by any means. That's my understanding at least.
It's more of a -- do you accept baptism by water?
The mormon is strong in this thread"Sa souvraya niende misain ye ... I am lost in my own mind"
― Robert Jordan, A Memory of Light
For he cannot read his tombstone when he’s dead.
_██_
(ಠ_ృ)
-
04-17-2008, 05:09 PM #59
-
04-17-2008, 05:39 PM #60
I can understand you being upset, but once you understand what it actually means it may not be upsetting. When someone is "baptized for the dead" all that means is that should they so choose they have the option of accepting that baptism and becoming LDS in the hereafter. Mormons believe that all people will eventually hear the entire gospel, and have the right to choose for themselves whether to accept it. This includes baptism, and that's why we do what we do. It's not like those people are added to the church rolls, or are listed as "Mormon" somewhere. It's simply offering them the choice, and they still have full control over whether or not they accept it.
A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man.
"Out of damp and gloomy days, out of solitude, out of loveless words directed at us, conclusions grow up in us like fungus: one morning they are there, we know not how, and they gaze upon us, morose and gray. Woe to the thinker who is not the gardener but only the soil of the plants that grow in him."
-Nietzsche
Bookmarks