I'm about 5'9" or so, 146lbs, so clearly I don't have a lot of body fat...I have some ab definition but I'm trying to eat more and as soon as I start to eat more (even the first few days), my definition goes away....what should I do to stay defined?
Just body weight exercises with more reps? or should I keep some weighted things in too?
|
-
11-20-2007, 03:35 PM #1
better for abs: high reps or weighted?
-
11-20-2007, 03:36 PM #2
-
11-20-2007, 03:38 PM #3
- Join Date: Feb 2005
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 7,479
- Rep Power: 3966
weighted
you wouldn't train any other bodypart with tons of reps and low resistance, so why would you train abs that way?"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
-
11-20-2007, 03:39 PM #4
-
-
11-20-2007, 03:46 PM #5
-
11-20-2007, 03:46 PM #6
-
11-20-2007, 03:49 PM #7
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Jupiter, Florida, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 121
- Rep Power: 207
+1. Use a balanced approach. Do you only train other muscle groups with high reps or high weight? I think the general consensus is to vary, at least to a small degree. If you've been training high rep, switch to higher weight exercises for a few weeks, or vice versa if you've been training them with higher weight, and see what happens.
Go Big Red!
-
11-20-2007, 03:52 PM #8
- Join Date: Feb 2005
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 7,479
- Rep Power: 3966
rep range is a better indicator, actually. for example, i can only do about 10 reps of hanging leg raises. even though it's bodyweight only, it's not like i'm doing sets of 30 or something.
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
-
-
11-20-2007, 04:14 PM #9
-
11-20-2007, 04:18 PM #10
-
11-20-2007, 04:26 PM #11
-
11-20-2007, 04:30 PM #12
-
-
11-20-2007, 05:50 PM #13
well abs aren't the same as every other muscle that's why...they're used much more than most in daily life...
anyway, I can do 3 sets of about 20 of leg raises without weight, so maybe I should lower the reps and try adding some weight to those?
I guess I'll just have to see what works...but does it sound unreasonable that I have lost definition so quickly? I mean I can clearly see that it happened, but is that expected or am does my body just suck lol
-
11-20-2007, 06:08 PM #14
-
11-20-2007, 06:19 PM #15
-
11-20-2007, 06:26 PM #16
-
-
11-20-2007, 07:49 PM #17
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: Bodrum, Bodrum, Turkey
- Age: 42
- Posts: 456
- Rep Power: 299
abs are not like other muscles in our body, they are the fastest adapting muscle group we have. If you keep training them with high reps for a long period you will end up doing 200 situps per set but will not reach your potential. Same goes for weighted training. Try training abs more often than what most people preach around here, its very hard to overtrain for most people. Change your routine every 2 weeks and try supersets or circuits
-
11-20-2007, 08:26 PM #18
You aren't gonna be the same as everybody else so you have to mix it up and see what works best. You can let this thread go for days and you'll have 33.3%say high, 33.3% say mix it up, and 33.3% say low... so asking others online won't really help.
Force Factor Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=142378451&p=833477401#post833477401
Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3226291
**New Jersey Crew (908)**
*Always Injured, but Still Stronger Than You Crew*
-
11-20-2007, 08:29 PM #19
-
11-20-2007, 11:09 PM #20
i agree with low weight explosiveness i know the best ab work out i ever get is from about 10 minutes of backtucks(what most people think of as a back flip)
basicly your jumping in the air and throwing your knees to your chest as fast as possible ..thats how you get your rotation
espicialy toward the end of the 10 minutes your jump starts losing a little height so you have to really pull fast to get around
-
-
11-20-2007, 11:27 PM #21
-
11-21-2007, 12:16 AM #22
-
11-21-2007, 02:25 AM #23
-
11-21-2007, 03:10 AM #24
-
-
11-21-2007, 03:22 AM #25
-
11-21-2007, 05:26 AM #26
-
11-21-2007, 05:31 AM #27
-
11-21-2007, 05:57 AM #28
Personally, I think genetics plays a big role in thick waisted people. You know what I mean. Sometimes guys just have a blocky waist and maybe adding too much muscle to the obliques may not be a great idea for that kind of a build.
I think people need to know the kind of build they have as to know how much or how little muscle will enhance their physiques in the ab/oblique area. Just a thought.
-
-
11-21-2007, 06:02 AM #29
-
11-21-2007, 06:10 AM #30
Yep. It depends on your goals. If you are really looking for that V taper with a thin waist, doing higher reps will keep those muscles smaller.
Once the diet is in check those abs will come out, but at the size you trained them for.
Zane used to do thousands of crunches and other ab exercises. The result, a small waist when his bodyfat was lower.
Yes and no. Abs are a muscle, and they are there whether you train them or not. How you train them depends on what look you are going for.
If you want rippled abs with canyons between them, weighted would definitely be the way to go.
Once again, they are a muscle so train them according to what you want. The only thing that makes abs different is the tendency of males to store most of their bodyfat there.
Bookmarks