|
-
10-27-2007, 08:20 AM #61
-
10-27-2007, 08:20 AM #62
-
10-27-2007, 08:20 AM #63
Yes, science "assumes" that if an observed phenomenon has occured the same way for the past say, 1000 years, that it will likely keep occuring. Science "assumes" that if we perform empricial testing that yield the same results over and over and over and over and over again that it will likely happen that way everytime.
If something asserts itself as reality or truth, then it can then be put into the realm of science. The only reason you don't want Christianity to be meshed with science, is because you know that it won't pass the scientific method. So in order to justify your beliefs, you compartmentalize Christanity away from rational thought and science."If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
10-27-2007, 08:21 AM #64
-
-
10-27-2007, 08:22 AM #65
-
10-27-2007, 08:22 AM #66
-
10-27-2007, 08:23 AM #67
Why assume any of them are correct? Why MUST a religion have it right, what if they are all wrong? If you believe there is a god, thats one thing, go for it. But as far as all of the hundreds of religions out there, how about you objectively research them first instead of classifying yourself as a member of said religion right of the bat?
"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
10-27-2007, 08:24 AM #68
-
-
10-27-2007, 08:26 AM #69
He's afraid not to believe in JC. The truth of the matter is that 99% of people who defend xianity without even knowing anything else think a big lightning bolt or something is going to come down out of the sky and hit them if they dare to question christianity at all. That's how xianity trains its followers, to minimize the chances of people breaking free of the brainwashing.
-
10-27-2007, 08:26 AM #70
naaah some old ppl in fancy hats thought it'd be cool to change it. big whoop?
google search all the **** thats missing from the new testament, hell apparently in the new revised edition i heard its gonna have a vote ron paul verse in it.
Its not written by jesus christ - just some people who were 'deemed' relgious higher ups that wanted to retell their story'sLast edited by ACslatering; 10-27-2007 at 08:28 AM.
Anna spelt backwards is Anna. Coincidence? I think NOT! - EclipseTT
-
10-27-2007, 08:27 AM #71
I comprehend all of it. The old covenant was "written on their lips," the new covenant will be "written on their hearts." That's the only difference, since the law is eternal and for all generations.
Has that happened yet? No, it's not "written in their hearts" (i.e., full torah observance), therefore, the messiah hasn't come yet.
It's pretty basic.
-
10-27-2007, 08:29 AM #72
-
-
10-27-2007, 08:30 AM #73
-
10-27-2007, 08:31 AM #74
-
10-27-2007, 08:31 AM #75
-
10-27-2007, 08:31 AM #76
I refuse to pull myself into a debate about Christ with those who don't follow Christ, so if i at any point just don't post anymore, it's probably because of your(or anyone elses) pushy and ignorant behavior.
That being said..I can not speak for all Christians, all catholics or all Protestants. I myself am a Protestant Christian though.
The bible CLEARLY states(where i can not quote off hand though) that there will ALWAYS be things that man will not understand. There will always be doubts. But it asks that you put your faith in Christ regardless.
You say a man that doesn't know so much about the bible shouldn't call himself a Christian. Well i say a man that claims to full understand and follow the bible is a liar. For it is quoted that man will never fully understand everything. It is yet another tribulation(or trial) the man is put through.
You did not learn about Christianity, you learned about what you read. You treated it as a textbook, soaked in the information, and deciphered it yourself. A true Christian only understands the book if God allows you to understand it. You took things literally without regard to other passages and probably took most things out of context.
When i first gave myself to the Lord i knew little, but i know that if you were to come to me then and say that i must not be a Christian because of my lack of understanding, i would of laughed in your faced and walked away. It was because of my willingness to walk into a faith and give it my life that i know and understand it the way i do today.Semper Fidelis.
-
-
10-27-2007, 08:33 AM #77
-
10-27-2007, 08:37 AM #78
-
10-27-2007, 08:37 AM #79
+1
I remember the day I "woke up" from the whole thing, came to my senses, and saw that it was a total fake, like some sort of comic book I had been hypnotized to believe in. It was like waking up out of a dream: everything looked fresh and alive. For a minute or two before it sunk in that I was totally free, I half expected to get hit with that lightning bolt myself!
-
10-27-2007, 08:38 AM #80
That is a whole new issue. I think people believe in a "God" for many different reasons.
Personally, a few reasons I want to believe in a God is firstly, life without a God feels empty. The thought that there is only this life, and nothing more.
Another one is that I have great respect for the Christian way of life. Sure, you can be a pretty "good" person without a religion, but I think you can only be so good without believing in something greater.
I am sure I will find more reasons as I experience Christianity further. I have also heard many other reasons e.g. from other Christians.
EDIT: Oh, and as I said I don't think it is possible to "objectively" examine a religion. BTW, I never did any classifying.Last edited by big_jon; 10-27-2007 at 08:42 AM.
-
-
10-27-2007, 08:40 AM #81
-
10-27-2007, 08:40 AM #82
Iow, it told you to turn off your brain so you could be brainwashed, and you complied. That's not really what your brain was designed for, though -- don't you wonder about that? About why it would tell you to do something so unnatural and contrary to your higher human nature?
And where does it say that, by the way? The people who wrote the bible have a much different idea of faith.
http://www.headcoverings-by-devorah....rsonality.html
-
10-27-2007, 08:43 AM #83
-
10-27-2007, 08:43 AM #84
Man, I really have no issue with people that want to believe a "god" exists. I personally can not force myself to believe in things that I see no evidence for, but thats me. I also have no problem if you respect "Christian values". But just because you respect the values in a book, does not lend to it being factual. For example you could think that the way the characters act in Harry Potter is great, doesn't mean its factual.
Im sure as you go on your Christian journey, you will meet many Christians who will tell you many neat sayings that will help you rationalize your beliefs further. Im about 99% positive however, you will not meet anyone that will give you any real deal hardcore evidence to support the Bible being factual.
Good luck."If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
-
10-27-2007, 08:43 AM #85
-
10-27-2007, 08:44 AM #86
-
10-27-2007, 08:45 AM #87
I mean...probably the Torah, you know, those writings that were responsible for even giving you the idea that a messiah would come. They just MIGHT know what the requirements for seeing as how it was THEIR idea to begin with. Not that its true either way, but as far as requirements are concerned, they probably are experts in that.
"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
10-27-2007, 08:54 AM #88
It sounds like you are equating evidence with "scientific" evidence. I've already explained why this is not a good idea.
The only evidence I am hoping to find is through my experiences.
BTW, I am not following Christianity *just* because I admire it's values, and it is definitely not something I am hoping to base my faith upon.
-
-
10-27-2007, 09:00 AM #89
-
10-27-2007, 09:14 AM #90
Once again, if it is asserting to be the true account of events and the way things work, then it is attempting to be science. And if its attempting to be science, then we should be able to find scientific evidence for it.
BTW, I am not following Christianity *just* because I admire it's values, and it is definitely not something I am hoping to base my faith upon."If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
Bookmarks