im sorry, but i dont understand dry vs wet gains
i take it wet gains is water weight that youll probably lose post cycle, correct?where dry gains are straight muscle that would be much easier to keep...
then why in the world would someone even do a wet ph cycle??whats the point?
|
Thread: dry vs wet
-
10-24-2007, 08:58 AM #1
-
10-24-2007, 09:11 AM #2
-
10-24-2007, 09:12 AM #3
-
10-24-2007, 09:16 AM #4
-
-
10-24-2007, 09:22 AM #5
-
10-24-2007, 09:23 AM #6
-
10-24-2007, 09:27 AM #7
Your diet is going to control whether you bulk or cut. They both can add muscle and the wet one will add more weight during the cycle but some of it will be water.
Correct phera is a wetter compound.Goals: More muscle
5' 11 1/2"
Started: 186 lbs 10/03
Currently: 241 roughly 16% Bf
Mortmans Activate/ Novedex XT Log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=1588791
-
10-24-2007, 09:31 AM #8
-
-
10-24-2007, 09:43 AM #9
Not entirely true. I gained a pretty good amount on H-Drol ( considered a dry compound). Another plus to this compound is the lack of sides. Gaines were slow but very noticeable. But it's not going to be as androgenic as "phera" where gains are a little more pronounced and not as side effect free.
<=><=>[]MFF[]<=><=>
*Jud's Comprehensive Pro-Hormone User Guide*
- 107087011
Bookmarks