Ronnie Vs. Paul Dillet

**RUHLda world** · 06-08-2005, 10:52 AM

I was just wondering, do you all think that if Paul Dillet was still in the game would he be able to dethrone Ronnie and become the new "Mr O". I mean it seems like the judges lean more towards the Mass Monsters and Paul Dillet was definately one of them.

**LatsMakeTheMan** · 06-08-2005, 10:57 AM

Dillets ranks among the best of them in terms of genetic potential. But from what I've heard he had a less than stellar work ethic.

Ronnie, on the other hand, works his ass off.

**YesMaster** · 06-08-2005, 10:57 AM

he's nothing

**JACKEDnswole** · 06-08-2005, 11:05 AM

Originally Posted by YesMaster

he's nothing

I wouldn't neccessarily say that, I mean @ his zenith compared to Ronnie's..
NO.
If we were to speak hypothetics, i'd say it'd be a good battle. Paul had the complete package, I just read that he couldn't nail his posing nor did he have the work ethic. But if he had all that in order definately could've dethroned him. Waist was always small tiny joints and huge calves. And that man's delts were serious.

**Ka$h** · 06-08-2005, 11:23 AM

dillet

**chad12121** · 06-08-2005, 11:37 AM

He has the Genetics, but not the work ethic. I think it was IFBB undercover that said he has never seen any pro with such a bad work ethic in the gym as paul dillet.

**Powers|ave** · 06-08-2005, 02:17 PM

dillet had maybe the best genetics ever. his potential was unbelievable, he could have easily been the best ever if he really wanted it.
dillet vs ronnie? from the front dillet beats big ron, but when they turn around, its lights out for dillet. his ONLY weakness was his lack of a well develpoed back.

**BigLarge** · 06-08-2005, 03:15 PM

Originally Posted by Powers|ave

dillet had maybe the best genetics ever. his potential was unbelievable, he could have easily been the best ever if he really wanted it.
dillet vs ronnie? from the front dillet beats big ron, but when they turn around, its lights out for dillet. his ONLY weakness was his lack of a well develpoed back.

Im going to have to disagree with you there. The ONLY person who has a chance at competing with Ron from the front is Ruhl. And Personally, I think that Flex has the best genetics ever, but this thread isnt about him.....

**mrdoggypoo** · 06-08-2005, 03:38 PM

holy $h!t, that guy is huge, i never heard of him. he def has the genetics. but i agree that either flex, serge nubret, or sergio oliva had best genetics.

**stever** · 06-08-2005, 03:53 PM

Dillet was pretty big, but its hard to compare the two.

**JNo20** · 06-08-2005, 03:55 PM

His back is his only weakness? How about his chest! Sure, it looks good when he's relaxed, but I saw him pose once (his version of posing, at any rate), and his pecs just seemed to slime up, almost zero density. And to say that Dillet could hold a candle to Big Ron is just absurd, in my mind at least. He had great genetics, and he place well, but I personally don't think it would even be a contest.

**F W Nietszche** · 06-08-2005, 03:58 PM

There are (were) very few people who could stand next to Dillet and look good. Dillet combined great genetics--he has a thiny waist much like Oliva--with huge mass. However, his flaw was not in his body, it was in his presentation, he was still very much an amatuer, he turned pro fast and rose up the ranks as such. Therefore, although he could outmass someone like Shawn Ray utterly, when viewed as a whole rather than separate pictures, he was very lacking.

Dillet was a early-mid ninetees bodybuilder, he ran with people like Yates. Thus he is severly outmassed by Ronnie. Hypothetically if he had kept at it he would have become bigger, but there are too many outlying factors to say for sure.

**F W Nietszche** · 06-08-2005, 04:00 PM

Originally Posted by mrdoggypoo

holy $h!t, that guy is huge, i never heard of him. he def has the genetics. but i agree that either flex, serge nubret, or sergio oliva had best genetics.

The genetics debate often comes down to two people:

Sergio and Dillet

Both were notoriously lazy in the gym (with respect to how their peers worked) and had great bodies nonetheless. Flex had proportions but did not carry mass well (as shown in his later years), his calves were lacking and he had fairly narrow clavicles.

**Marxx** · 06-08-2005, 04:20 PM

I happened to see Dillet at the Toronto Pro last weekend. Still a very huge guy but didn't seem to be in any type of shape.

**flexmuscles2003** · 06-08-2005, 05:03 PM

I dont think he can beat Coleman he never came close to the Mr Olympia trophy.

**Man, I_m Big** · 06-08-2005, 05:10 PM

All he did was take gear and chat in the gym. He'd complain about why he couldn;t behind the neck press 225. Big guy, too dumb to realize the potential. I think he was more concerned about making money. That's not a bad thing, but when you could be king and piss it away...

BTW Yo Marxx, was he still working the counter at Gold's?

**bigasssnowman** · 06-08-2005, 07:08 PM

in a couple issues of md paul talks about making a come back.

**U R Bunk** · 06-08-2005, 07:54 PM

Originally Posted by bigasssnowman

in a couple issues of md paul talks about making a come back.

I too was wondering whatever became of that.

**jayvee** · 06-08-2005, 08:52 PM

no. from the front, paul just standing there looked like a champion. start the posing and he looked like he was going to pass out and die. paul is the only athlete i have ever seen, whose back actually looked SMALLER after pulling a rear lat spread. he could just not display his body..

then, the obvious - from the back, paul would be destroyed by ronnie, no contest. he had trouble beating levrone, shawn and flex let alone dorian, so i just cant see him touching ronnie unless he made some drastic improvements. rather odd guy too, not that that should matter too much..

**j_neatherlin** · 06-08-2005, 09:25 PM

if you've ever seen Dillet on stage, you'd realize that Coleman would smoke him, easily.

Not even b/c Coleman has a better physique, but as was mentioned earlier, Dillet's presentation just wasn't there. It was painful watching that guy pose. If you haven't seen it in person or on a video, you can't grasp the concept. Pictures certainly don't tell the story. It was just horrible.

**my_name_is** · 06-09-2005, 12:46 AM

Originally Posted by YesMaster

he's nothing

This coming from a 17 year old who couldn't lift Pauls warm up weights. This place is hilarious.

**Mustang 4.6** · 06-09-2005, 02:52 AM

Originally Posted by mrdoggypoo

holy $h!t, that guy is huge, i never heard of him. he def has the genetics. but i agree that either flex, serge nubret, or sergio oliva had best genetics.

LOL-LOL Ya that is what you call big. And that coming from a Ron fan it would be a run for the money. Does any one have Pic of his back so I can see how he stacks up with Big Ron????

**JACKEDnswole** · 06-09-2005, 04:47 AM

Originally Posted by BigLarge

Im going to have to disagree with you there. The ONLY person who has a chance at competing with Ron from the front is Ruhl. And Personally, I think that Flex has the best genetics ever, but this thread isnt about him.....

From the front and ONLY the front Rhul is Crushing people. Rhul has absolutely nothing in the back and I mean nothing.

No Tris
Hamstrings
nor back.

It looks like he holds alot of water back there. As for Dillet, Look @ the 1999 NOC and you'll see a pretty complete back. He dominated that show. If any of you can remember he beat Nasser(@ his best) Lee Priest, Levrone, Rhul, and so on.

**Ka$h** · 06-09-2005, 05:08 AM

Dillet's back

**JACKEDnswole** · 06-09-2005, 06:20 AM

Originally Posted by Ka$h

Dillet's back

He cant pose. Never could. That would make him look so much better.

A few more of his back.

**Marxx** · 06-09-2005, 09:32 AM

Originally Posted by Man, I'm Big

BTW Yo Marxx, was he still working the counter at Gold's?

No he was just walking around with his buddies.

Originally Posted by Ka$h

Dillet's back

Wow, just looking at the show pics really do show how bad of a poser he was.

**jeyfr59** · 06-10-2005, 02:23 AM

the real question is: if dillet train damn hard like coleman , what will be the result?
of course dillet had huge body part but his body is the reflect of his train , something is missing! he was a lazzy ass!

**TheAustrianOak** · 06-10-2005, 08:38 AM

ive always been a fan of dillet's build

his chest vascularity is awesome

**chad12121** · 06-10-2005, 09:07 AM

Originally Posted by F W Nietszche

The genetics debate often comes down to two people:

Sergio and Dillet

Both were notoriously lazy in the gym (with respect to how their peers worked) and had great bodies nonetheless. Flex had proportions but did not carry mass well (as shown in his later years), his calves were lacking and he had fairly narrow clavicles.

Bump to that. Flexs genetics are overrated he used esiclene and synthol to perfect his proportions. Sergio was known for bad dieting, although I believe he did hard work in the gym. Dillet is known for his lazy ethic in the gym.

**gjoe** · 06-10-2005, 10:06 AM

Originally Posted by chad12121

Bump to that. Flexs genetics are overrated he used esiclene and synthol to perfect his proportions. Sergio was known for bad dieting, although I believe he did hard work in the gym. Dillet is known for his lazy ethic in the gym.

Flex used synthol????? where???

Thread: Ronnie Vs. Paul Dillet

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Ronnie Vs. Paul Dillet

kickin ass!!!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions