I've played ice hockey for 10 years so I think most of my weight is in my legs, my calves are probably my best body part right now.
I'm 5'11 and 207.4 lbs, a lot of people don't think I'm that heavy but I don't know what to tell them.
Anyway should I bulk and put some muscle on, or cut now and then muscle later?
|
|
Results 1 to 18 of 18
-
09-22-2007, 11:24 AM #1Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 36
- Posts: 60
- Rep Power: 203
Bulk or cut? Heavy but not super fat!
-
09-22-2007, 11:28 AM #2Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2005
- Location: Torquay, England
- Age: 47
- Posts: 288
- Rep Power: 528
Hit the weights hard and eat the right foods to get them muscles pumped up.
-
09-22-2007, 11:28 AM #3Whallet
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: BMBC Frat House, Togo
- Age: 34
- Posts: 16,196
- Rep Power: 33932
bulk
add 15-20 lbs of muscle then id say cut
jus my opinion thoughIG = @ Bmur18 - Follow me and message for reps
**BMBC...MANG!**
rep back 10k+
-
09-22-2007, 11:38 AM #4Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: Balsam Lake, Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 6,860
- Rep Power: 0
definately bulk.
-
-
09-22-2007, 11:48 AM #5Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 36
- Posts: 60
- Rep Power: 203
I want to bulk extremely cleanly because I don't want to gain hardly any more fat.
-
09-22-2007, 12:29 PM #6Then be really careful with your dietOriginally Posted by 650hpGTI
-
09-22-2007, 12:35 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 36
- Posts: 60
- Rep Power: 203
will be.Originally Posted by dpman
-
09-22-2007, 12:38 PM #8
I would say to verify with another scale. i have never seen a person with your build at 5' 11" weigh 207.
-
-
09-22-2007, 12:39 PM #9Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 36
- Posts: 60
- Rep Power: 203
I'm going to leg pics to see if it makes a difference in what you think.Originally Posted by SB7
-
09-22-2007, 12:47 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 36
- Posts: 60
- Rep Power: 203
leg pics.
-
09-22-2007, 12:52 PM #11Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 1,009
- Rep Power: 428
I agree with bulking more, you would probably still look to small if you cut so I wouldn't bother wasting time cutting right now.
Madcow 5x5 Journal:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=106857231
-
09-22-2007, 01:24 PM #12Just watch the belly.Originally Posted by 650hpGTI
leg pics.
No need to get the next size pants.
think more about building muscle not gaining weight.
your waist is already looking a bit thick so keep yourself in check.
-
-
09-22-2007, 01:26 PM #13Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 36
- Posts: 60
- Rep Power: 203
i am 34" inch waist right now.
-
09-23-2007, 02:37 AM #14It's not what the back of the jeans say or what the tape measure reads that counts.Originally Posted by 650hpGTI
It's about how you look
-
09-23-2007, 09:48 AM #15
Yeah definitely go for a clean bulk
Gain more muscle mass and get your metabolism really going before you try to shred fat
-
09-23-2007, 03:58 PM #16Beeeefffcakkeee
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 33
- Posts: 10
- Rep Power: 0
awesome, thanks too,
this helps me, because I have close to the same body as you.
-
-
09-23-2007, 05:07 PM #17Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2007
- Age: 34
- Posts: 671
- Rep Power: 278
Wow, I can't believe that you weigh 207 at 5'11. I'm 6'0, weigh 165, and look bigger than you. Wierd, must just mean that you have plenty of muscle under that fat.
Don't eat like a horse.
Eat an actual horse!
-
09-23-2007, 05:36 PM #18Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: manchester, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 35
- Posts: 3,877
- Rep Power: 0
in these situations i always say cut.
Bookmarks