Are you hypocrites? (gay)

[TommyTuffGuy]

On a strictly scientific standpoint, they've already done tests concluding that women can be totally bisexual and men cannot. All the "bisexual" men tested were found to only get truly erect/turned on (hooked to certain machines that gauge response) when gay scenes were presented to them.

Basically, men claiming to be bisexual are finding themselves out and are truly gay, where-in women who are bisexual (not totally gay) are wired that way due to their chemistry.

So yes, these things are totally different.

[TwiloMike]

I dont belive yours is supported by evidence either, unless i missed some obvious points in your comments.

I'm not the one claiming that there are only specific uses for which various bodyparts are "designed", a list lesser than the actual uses for which said various bodyparts are commonly and successfully employed.

I wouldnt go as far as saying a vast majority. Numerous people report bleeding and other such things, i wouldnt say most, or even half, but if i had to take a guess id say a good 1/5-8.

Bleeding and chaffing can also happen during vaginal sex (and I'm not talking about breaking of the hymen)... Numerous people report such issues. So?

You're obviously arguing natural vs. unnatural and im arguing right and wrong, iv noticed that you are arguing that, has it not become apperant that we are not trying to share the same - opposite conclusions in our points(im pretty sure that didnt make sence but hopefully you'll get it, if not, im sorry).

How the heck can you attach "right" and "wrong" to sexual acts between consenting adults? Based on what?

[comebakthursday]

Oral sex is unnatural according to you... and coupled with teh previous quote about taboos there is no reason to not take your stand on anal sex to be the same as oral sex.


Quoted for teh funnay.

All im going to say is that if it's that hard for you to comprehend that i retract my statments involving natural/unnatural then read ALL my post and stop with this ANNOYING quoting trying to prove a point about something iv already retracted.

[comebakthursday]

American Heritage Dictionary - func?tion (fŭngk'shən) Pronunciation Key
n.
1-The action for which a person or thing is particularly fitted or employed.

a-Assigned duty or activity.
b-A specific occupation or role: in my function as chief editor.

The function of the mouth (which is composed of various elements with their own more specific functions) is to perform as I outlined.

Finally a slight improvment..

[comebakthursday]

I'm not the one claiming that there are only specific uses for which various bodyparts are "designed", a list lesser than the actual uses for which said various bodyparts are commonly and successfully employed.


Bleeding and chaffing can also happen during vaginal sex (and I'm not talking about breaking of the hymen)... Numerous people report such issues. So?


How the heck can you attach "right" and "wrong" to sexual acts between consenting adults? Based on what?

No but you are claiming they are designed for going off nothing but your opinion. Whatever you accuse me of, you too are guilty of.

Yes but the sole point(originally) of vaginal sex was procreation, it's also most likely the most common type of sexual activity involved in intercourse, and you cant have prolapsed vaginas and it's not the number one cause of aids and possibly some other std's last time i checked.

I thought it was made clear that i was subsituting the words right and wrong in place of pros and cons, i ecspecially thought it was clear considering thats basically been my whole argument. Someone hasnt been paying attention.

You can retaliate but im done with this conversation I attempted to end it once mutually and on good terms but obviously it wasnt possible for you to admit your comments are nothing but opinions and to move on.

[TwiloMike]

All im going to say is that if it's that hard for you to comprehend that i retract my statments involving natural/unnatural then read ALL my post and stop with this ANNOYING quoting trying to prove a point about something iv already retracted.

I didn't see you post anywhere that anal sex or oral sex are natural.

[Shadow666]

I like lesbian porn.
I HATE gay men.

Therefore yes, I am a hypocrite.

[TwiloMike]

No but you are claiming they are designed for going off nothing but your opinion. Whatever you accuse me of, you too are guilty of.

My claim is based on analyzing what is actually there without sexual inhibition issues.

Yes but the sole point(originally) of vaginal sex was procreation,

In all species? Based on what do you make this assertion?

it's also most likely the most common type of sexual activity involved in intercourse, and you cant have prolapsed vaginas and it's not the number one cause of aids and possibly some other std's last time i checked.

If you look at world statistics (meaning, if you factor in the non-Western world) then vaginal intercourse is possibly the leading cause of HIV spread. Also, vigorous vaginal sex is not without risks also (bleeding, cervical issues, etc).

I thought it was made clear that i was subsituting the words right and wrong in place of pros and cons, i ecspecially thought it was clear considering thats basically been my whole argument. Someone hasnt been paying attention.

Those words aren't interchangeable and each set carries with it its own set of loaded context.

You can retaliate but im done with this conversation I attempted to end it once mutually and on good terms but obviously it wasnt possible for you to admit your comments are nothing but opinions and to move on.

How high and mighty of you.

[Guardian]

Ive been here a while and can see that the general consensus concerning homosexualtiy is terribly, terribly biased.
You all like two women making out....and more.
But two guys kissing and doing other stuff, is repulsive to you.

Its not the same-sex acts that disturb you, its just the guy/guy stuff....interesting difference. Whats surprising is that most of you admit to being hypocritical.

With this distorted mind set, how can any of you be taken seriously???

The problem in life and in this situation is peoples emotions sometimes cant be changed by science or anything else. Alot of people are uncomfortable and dont approve of homosexual behavior, and no amount of logic or reasoning will change that. Its if you went up to a wild wolf even if it was completly tamed, you might get alittle afraid no matter how much someone tries to convince you its safe.

You can fight for rights or whatever else, but in the end peoples emotions are what they are and acceptance on a government document wont always equate to real world acceptance.