yeah i ment the jerk bit..thats not cool
|
View Poll Results: ...
- Voters
- 1018. You may not vote on this poll
-
Kevin Levrone
643 63.16% -
Flex Wheeler
375 36.84%
Thread: Kevin Levrone Vs Flex Wheeler
-
07-13-2007, 12:36 PM #61
-
07-13-2007, 12:37 PM #62
-
07-13-2007, 02:02 PM #63
-
07-13-2007, 02:46 PM #64
-
-
07-13-2007, 03:32 PM #65
i have heard the "Levrone's arms overpowered his physique", and the only thing I can figure is people are getting hung up on the hands-clasped most muscular where his arms look fuggin' enormous. Of course, that is the nature of that specific pose.
however, in a FDB, BDB, side chest or conventional MM, his arms don't overpower the rest of his body
-
07-13-2007, 05:23 PM #66
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 226
- Rep Power: 241
From the Front they are almost a tie, from the side Kevin wins hands down, from the back Wheeler wins hands down.
I personally like Flex better, he has better genes, and the detail in his back to this day IMO is untouched.
Pose for pose here is who i'd give each shot to:
Front Double Bicep - Flex, better peak biceps.
Lat Spread from the front- Levrone, wider lats.
Back Double Bicep- Flex, not even close here.
Lat Spread - Tie, Levrone is wider, but I prefer Flex's detail and thickness.
Side Chest - Levrone, better sweep.
Side Tricep- Flex, triceps were amazing.
Abs and Thighs- Tie, on their best days, they both have this pose down pack.
Most Muscular- Hands-clasped= Levrone, Power show = Wheeler.
Flex wins 6-5Last edited by JoeFlexYourself; 07-13-2007 at 05:28 PM.
-
07-13-2007, 05:51 PM #67
-
07-13-2007, 06:07 PM #68
In my opinion Levrone had better genes. What Levrone had going for him was massive delts when Wheeler needed oil. Levrones legs at their peak were better then Flexs.
Side tri to flex? I dunno man to me thats inviting a loss of credibilty to you, Levrone had the best side tri of his era along with Yates.
Again Id give the edge to Flex as of now but I do think Levrone had better genes. Bob Chick also believes this as he said Arnold and Kevin had the best genes of the sport so far.
-
-
07-13-2007, 06:12 PM #69
-
07-13-2007, 06:15 PM #70
How can anyone lose credibility for bringing a divergent opinion on something that is entirely subjective?
Why do you bring up Bob opinion in reference to this subject, he is just one person the status he has attained as a bodybuilder is not really relevant. There are many people who think Dillet had the best genes along with Levrone i agree with that. Arnold had great biceps and chest everything else on his wasn't great. Arnold's legs were definitely lagging he had a wide waist and his abs weren't great so i don't see how one could say he had the best genes.
-
07-13-2007, 06:19 PM #71
-
07-13-2007, 06:24 PM #72
I do believe in the thread that talked about the best side tri Wheeler wasnt even in the poll! I could be wrong Ill try to find the thread.
Bob is just one person, but his opinion at least id think means more then ur average poster since he is a pro and not some geek like me on his computer!
I think you just like to pick on my posts. Wheeler was not known for his side tri shot at all while Kevin is considered to be one of the best. I barely have ever seen pictures of Flex in side tri.
JoeFlexYourself
Flex did look amaxing in 93, in the AC in specific I think may have been the best physique to ever hit the stage. So please dont take my posts as not liking Flex, im a big fan of his check my sig!
-
-
07-13-2007, 07:38 PM #73
-
07-13-2007, 09:11 PM #74
-
07-13-2007, 10:05 PM #75
-
07-13-2007, 10:19 PM #76
Flex wins the side triceps pose in my opinion. He has GREAT triceps.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
...............................R.I.P.................................
.............Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian.........
.................₪₪₪₪₪₪1989-2011₪₪₪₪₪₪.............
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
-
-
07-13-2007, 10:37 PM #77
the lat and triceps thing
I was unable to find a worthwhile side triceps pic of Flex. However, here is a comparison of their rear lat spreads, as best as I could make it, with a few other pics as well.
If someone could post up a side triceps of flex, I'd appreciate it, because Flex simply isn't known for his side tri, and I'd like to get a look at what I'm missing.
-
07-14-2007, 05:03 AM #78
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 35
- Posts: 2,824
- Rep Power: 0
I think Levrone had a more rugged physique than Flex.
I remember reading a book which described Wheeler's body as being filled with orbs and ellipses, he just had a better flow than Levrone imo
I'm not taking anyway from Kevin because he's one of the best bodybuilders in history period, but i just think that Flex was the better bodybuilder.
As for triceps, Kevin's were larger but Flex had better seperation.This one's for you baby
-
07-14-2007, 05:04 AM #79
-
07-14-2007, 05:45 AM #80
-
-
07-14-2007, 09:12 AM #81
i dont meen to imply anything if this isnt true, but didnt flex admit to injections? synthol? in his bycepts and shoulders, i have even heard romours about them in his back( not confermed) so how can you put 100% genetic muscle in a comparison to someone who has " fake muscle"... if this is true about flex then why would anyone say he is better then levrone?????????????
-
07-14-2007, 10:02 AM #82
I think this debate will rage on for years to come...
We're talking freakiness vs aesthetics here.
As far as I'm concerned, when Kevin hit the side most muscular, he could dwarf ANYONE foolish enough to stand next to him (including superfreaks like Coleman and Dillett) The only reason he didn't win the Olympia, was because both Yates and Coleman had more impressive aesthetics, particularly Yates with the front lat spread. Flex went overboard with the drugs, implants and synthol...anyone who needs to resort to those isn't worthy of the Olympia.
-
07-14-2007, 10:33 AM #83
The problem I have with Flex is he just seems very artificial in the sense that he oiled up his delts and calves. I know that this sport is all about performance enhanced drugs, but to me without all the oil Levrone completely owned him. He displayed much more density from the front IMO, his back WAS wider and thicker, legs better at his peak like Gaurdian said. Overall Levrone was the most amazing pro I have ever seen from the front. I think he had just as equal aesthetic appeal as Flex.
Founder of DPA Fitness & Author of The Weight Training Antidote.
My Free E-book - The Weight Training Antidote: http://dpafitness.com/the-weight-training-antidote
-
07-14-2007, 10:50 AM #84
I had to go with Levrone. During his peak Kevin had the best delts, triceps, and some of the best quads EVER! Whoever gave the side tricep to Flex is insane.
Flex compensated for his lack of work ethic by almost destroying his symmetry with synothol. Instead of busting his @$$ in the gym he went the easy route. Has anyone seen his earlier videos? The guy was a straight up @$$ it was almost unwatchable. Levrone was the first bodybuilder I saw, so I'm a little biased as he was really the one that got me interested in bodybuilding.
-
-
07-14-2007, 11:22 AM #85
Ok heres a rear lat of flex and some tri shots. I'm a fan of Flex's tri's he has awsome definition, but obviously doesnt have the same size as Kevin's.
Some of the pics are pretty blurry though. Just because Kevin had a thicker back, and has some of the best tri's doesnt automatically mean hes better than flex. Flex has arguably the BEST back...ever. Look at the definition. Kevin has arguably the best tri's ever. Not my favorite, they're huge, but not striations, etc. I would give the best tri's to someone else like Samir Bannout, but definately, IMO, Flex has the best back.
This topic will never be resolved. Know why? Because everyone has their own opinion, and what one person might think is the best physique is the opposite of what someone else thinks.
-
07-14-2007, 03:54 PM #86
flex was all about the FDB and BDB. He got smoked in most musculars (when he didn't inflate his delts/arms) and his rear lat spread was simply poor. Yes, great detail in a BDB, great definition, and fantastic aesthetics, but you can't lay claim to "best <bodypart>" when it is completely lacking something (width)
lats show in more poses than a BDB. Can't judge the man solely on one pose.
that being said, Flex is easily one of the best bodybuilders ever, so we are definitely splitting hairs here.
-
07-14-2007, 04:30 PM #87
-
07-14-2007, 04:54 PM #88
Yeah, you have some really good points. I agree, his back definately could be thicker. He didnt really have many lagging bodyparts though, besides his lats (and calves). I mean, look at the black and white pic I posted a several posts up, where he is looking down. His legs look awsome, as well as his arms, delts, chest, etc. Absolutely perfect physique in that pic, IMO.
-
-
07-14-2007, 07:24 PM #89
-
07-14-2007, 07:50 PM #90
Bookmarks