Rugby players' asses are the best.

**kassi_the_one** · 07-04-2007, 08:04 AM

From what i see, the Rugby players have the best bodies in sports, better then the best bodies of the nfl. they have massive legs of soccer players and great upper bodies. But the sport doesnt seem to be popular in the u.s.

**Maddenguy2008** · 07-04-2007, 08:05 AM

this thread is teh homo

**ohsnap** · 07-04-2007, 08:05 AM

From what I've seen, it depends on the position. Some of those guys are pretty big, though. (no homo)

**GiftedLiftin39** · 07-04-2007, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by kassi_the_one

From what i see, the Rugby players have the best bodies in sports, better then the best bodies of the nfl. they have massive legs of soccer players and great upper bodies. But the sport doesnt seem to be popular in the u.s.

because their lame???? I doubt they have better bodies than NFLers. show me soem pics.

and I didnt know soccer players have massive legs. All the soccer palyers in high school were skinny preppy nerds that alway wore soccer jerseys and stuf.

**LatinoHeat210** · 07-04-2007, 08:06 AM

**mizzOe** · 07-04-2007, 08:06 AM

**ibimusbtms** · 07-04-2007, 08:06 AM

its cause its a real man's sport. they have leather balls, ya'know....

**Kiwi_Fella** · 07-04-2007, 08:07 AM

Bro dont start this. Its a no win situation. You gotta understand you're on a forum with the majority being American, they'll always side with NFL

**Brozart** · 07-04-2007, 08:08 AM

Originally Posted by GiftedLiftin39

because their lame???? I doubt they have better bodies than NFLers. show me soem pics.

See, when you talk about NFLers' bodies, that doesn't include all the ****in. padding and armour.

**dr_D** · 07-04-2007, 08:09 AM

Originally Posted by kassi_the_one

From what i see, the Rugby players have the best bodies in sports, better then the best bodies of the nfl. they have massive legs of soccer players and great upper bodies. But the sport doesnt seem to be popular in the u.s.

you would have never guessed that seeing the bodies of my teammates when I used to play. the team is a bunch of misfits.

the sport is very popular in the dc, maryland, virginia area

**wincjw** · 07-04-2007, 08:09 AM

I predict 20 pages..

**Maddenguy2008** · 07-04-2007, 08:10 AM

look at the massive arms

**ohsnap** · 07-04-2007, 08:12 AM

edit: pic didn't work but do a search for Michael Pittman. He was a running back for the Bucs and has HUGE arms.

There are big guys in rugby, but there are smaller guys too. There are huge, ripped guys in the NFL, but there are also the fatass offensive tackles and guys like that. It just comes down to the position and the player.

**GiftedLiftin39** · 07-04-2007, 08:15 AM

those rugby palyers look just like average college kids, or guys in muscle and fitness.

nothing too spectacular.

**zoran007** · 07-04-2007, 08:17 AM

**Kiwi_Fella** · 07-04-2007, 08:18 AM

Originally Posted by GiftedLiftin39

those rugby palyers look just like average college kids, or guys in muscle and fitness.

nothing too spectacular.

Says the 5"7 155lb guy

**bruno** · 07-04-2007, 08:20 AM

http://www.bestsportsphotos.com/imag...masJones03.jpg

Thomas Jones-5'10 220 pounds, and the guy is a freakin sculpture, ripped to shreds (no homo)

**dr_D** · 07-04-2007, 08:21 AM

you need a hell of a lot of endurance for rugby, 40 minute halves and very little if any substitutions

this thread is gonna turn into another rugby vs football thread =/

**Maddenguy2008** · 07-04-2007, 08:22 AM

Originally Posted by bruno

http://www.bestsportsphotos.com/imag...masJones03.jpg

Thomas Jones-5'10 220 pounds, and the guy is a freakin sculpture, ripped to shreds (no homo)

/thread

**zoran007** · 07-04-2007, 08:24 AM

yep NFL players have the best bodies but I think that rugby is much more a difficult sport then football...

**jpadilla** · 07-04-2007, 08:28 AM

Originally Posted by zoran007

yep NFL players have the best bodies but I think that rugby is much more a difficult sport then football...

thats how threds escalate from a topic to rugby vs football.......noone is asking wich is the harder sport......

**GiftedLiftin39** · 07-04-2007, 08:31 AM

Originally Posted by Kiwi_Fella

Says the 5"7 155lb guy

I cant help it that im not taller than 5'7...yah *******.

NFL fatties can still pwn

^^^ how many guys in rugby are 215+lbs, can still manuever around guys in pads/helmets, and can also run probably faster than most rugby players that arent wearing pads?

^ you want to talk about thick legs? you mjusta never heard of barry sanders, one of the greatest runningbacks ever.

oh..and Kiwi_fella...most of the greatest runningbacks are 3-4 inches around my height..so suck one.

**GiftedLiftin39** · 07-04-2007, 08:36 AM

Rugby fans can say all they want..the whole..RUGBY IS TOUGHER! BLAH BLAH BLAH

rugby is playing backyard football..thats off season, middle school, high school ****. we do that all the time.

and also, maybe rugby is tougher, but injuries are much higher probably. and the more your injured the less your having fun. Sports should be fun and skilled. thats football.

also rugby palyers wear gay collared shirts and striped ****ing stockings...panzies.

**Kiwi_Fella** · 07-04-2007, 08:37 AM

See what I mean about this thread getting outta hand? Go use the search, this has been done and dusted kid

**superduck** · 07-04-2007, 08:40 AM

Originally Posted by GiftedLiftin39

Rugby fans can say all they want..the whole..RUGBY IS TOUGHER! BLAH BLAH BLAH

rugby is playing backyard football..thats off season, middle school, high school ****. we do that all the time.

and also, maybe rugby is tougher, but injuries are much higher probably. and the more your injured the less your having fun. Sports should be fun and skilled. thats football.

also rugby palyers wear gay collared shirts and striped ****ing stockings...panzies.

shut the **** up you're an idiot and have no idea what you're talking about

your ****ing sig says 'who doesn't want to kick someones ass'? which implies injuring someone, you ****wit

but wait! injuring someone makes the sport less fun! but wait, you say MMA for life!

assclown

**GiftedLiftin39** · 07-04-2007, 08:40 AM

Originally Posted by Kiwi_Fella

See what I mean about this thread getting outta hand? Go use the search, this has been done and dusted kid

true...BUT!

i bet FEDOR EMELIANENKO CAN KICK BOTH RUGBY PLAYERS AND FOOTBALL PLAYERS ASSES!!!!

and he doesnt even have the best body.

MMA is where its at.

**YesOrNo** · 07-04-2007, 08:41 AM

Originally Posted by GiftedLiftin39

Rugby fans can say all they want..the whole..RUGBY IS TOUGHER! BLAH BLAH BLAH

rugby is playing backyard football..thats off season, middle school, high school ****. we do that all the time.

and also, maybe rugby is tougher, but injuries are much higher probably. and the more your injured the less your having fun. Sports should be fun and skilled. thats football.

also rugby palyers wear gay collared shirts and striped ****ing stockings...panzies.

and this **** is why this is going to become a 20+ page thread. let's argue about the existence of God while we're at it eh?

**burg** · 07-04-2007, 08:42 AM

Originally Posted by GiftedLiftin39

I cant help it that im not taller than 5'7...yah *******.

NFL fatties can still pwn

^^^ how many guys in rugby are 215+lbs, can still manuever around guys in pads/helmets, and can also run probably faster than most rugby players that arent wearing pads?

^ you want to talk about thick legs? you mjusta never heard of barry sanders, one of the greatest runningbacks ever.

oh..and Kiwi_fella...most of the greatest runningbacks are 3-4 inches around my height..so suck one.

The majority of them, whats your point?

The kiwi backs are all about 220lbs or over and alot of them have OLYMPIC speed

**Persian Guns** · 07-04-2007, 08:43 AM

Originally Posted by GiftedLiftin39

I cant help it that im not taller than 5'7...yah *******.

NFL fatties can still pwn

^^^ how many guys in rugby are 215+lbs, can still manuever around guys in pads/helmets, and can also run probably faster than most rugby players that arent wearing pads?

^ you want to talk about thick legs? you mjusta never heard of barry sanders, one of the greatest runningbacks ever.

oh..and Kiwi_fella...most of the greatest runningbacks are 3-4 inches around my height..so suck one.

none of those fatties have the ability to be moving around the field for 80 minutes or the ability to pass, kick, run, lift players in lineouts, scrumage etc etc. whats the point of arguing different sports that require different skills

**GiftedLiftin39** · 07-04-2007, 08:45 AM

whatever..lets stop the arguing.

we can just say both have great bodies, but its very dumb to say either or neither have the BEST BODIES in any sport.

I must say i like New Zealand though, and their Haka(is that right?) that ****s pumpin.

but I like football because of the spectacular stuff you can accomplish, all the highlights of rugby are jsut like hardcore tackles, football higlights your seeing some very amazing stuff.

either way..

Thread: Rugby players' asses are the best.

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rugby players' bodies are the best.

Massive !!!!!!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions