|
-
07-02-2007, 08:02 AM #31
-
07-02-2007, 08:04 AM #32
I already considered them before making the thread. The difference between me and you is I DONT believe an all powerful being created us. I think the bible was a story that someone wrote to explain the unexplainable at that time frame. So, back when they thought that the sun went up and down on the horizon instead of the earth rotating, the concept of how night and day works would be alot different back then.
"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
-
07-02-2007, 10:31 AM #33
-
07-02-2007, 10:36 AM #34
The problem is, he didnt just say "let there be light!" and then moved on from there. I have no problem with an all powerful deity creating light without a sun. My problem is that he also created night and day specifically. There can be no night and day without a sun and a rotating planet. Please re-read my OP.
"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
07-02-2007, 10:39 AM #35
-
07-02-2007, 07:45 PM #36
someone forgot their thinking cap The universe was dark, and God stepped into the dark universe that he just made. Sort of like a lightning bug entering into the dark nesting place it just prepared....
EDIT: I apologize for the smart remark i made above. I will not delete was already said but sometimes my internet smarty pants alter ego kicks in.Last edited by StrongInChrist; 07-02-2007 at 07:49 PM.
-
-
07-02-2007, 07:47 PM #37
-
07-02-2007, 07:48 PM #38
-
07-02-2007, 08:06 PM #39
-
07-02-2007, 10:55 PM #40
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,935
- Rep Power: 85704
A little more everyday
The only reason you don't fully understand the Bible is that you haven't grown up enough. How arrogant are those that condemn the Bible because all the answers aren't instantly revealed. Some answers in the Bible can take a life time for us to understand.
I grew up with the Bible, and yet I'm still learning things from it everyday. Your position just prove you still have a lot to learn as well. However the foundation of the Bible is "faith" (even a little is a start) but if you don't have that, it will NEVER make sense🎥
Site oldest post: [url]https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941[/url]
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
-
-
07-02-2007, 11:01 PM #41
-
07-03-2007, 05:44 AM #42
How would faith allow someones brain to understand something? Thats a contradiction. Faith, is what you use when you dont know something for a fact. Understanding and faith cant really coexist with this type of thing. Again, what a great god you worship that sends people to hell if they dont do things in the bible, yet, he made it purposely hard to understand.
And the ad hominen attack is pretty cute. I haven't grown up enough? Trust me, I had to grow up ALOT quicker than alot of people. DOnt jump to conclusions because your little myth doesnt make any since. Its very clear that god creates night and day before he creates the sun which is an impossiblity. Can god create a square circle?"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
07-03-2007, 05:58 AM #43
-
07-03-2007, 06:04 AM #44
-
-
07-03-2007, 06:20 AM #45
Some Protestants insist that the Bible is to be taken literally.
Catholics and Orthodox Christians believe that the bible is the Truth, but not necessarily a literally "blow by blow" description of God's Word or the history of God's people. Although we do believe that many parts of the Bible is historically accurate.
Additionally, they believe that God progressively revealed His nature to his people over time.
Catholics and Orthodox Christians believe that God's word has been transmitted via two paths. Holy Tradition and Scripture.
So, to ask how light existed before the Sun, has no impact on how a Catholic or Orthodox Christian sees his faith.
However, taking this from another perspective, light probably existed before any star existed. Between the big bang and the first star, the universe was extremely energetic.
http://www.pbs.org/deepspace/images/tlbigbang.gif
Source: pbs.org
So the answer to your question is described in the hypothesis posted above in the timeframe labeled "radiation era".But those who fight for right must remember St. Augustine's sage words,
"right is right even if no one is doing it...and wrong is wrong even if every one is doing it!"
-----------
Got Causality?
-----------
God, Duty, Honour, Country
-
07-03-2007, 07:45 AM #46
To be honest, I titled this thread incorrectly. I really meant, how did god create night and day. Ive tried to explain this several times but people keep sticking with the light part, which I guess isn't their fault, but try reading all the thread so you see where Im coming from.
"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
07-03-2007, 07:57 AM #47
Sorry for not getting it the first time.
But the answer is still the same.
If you believe that the bible is literal, then you have a lot of rationalizing to do. But since the biggest Christian Churches don't hold the bible to be inerrant on history, but only inerrant on faith, your question is a moot for them.But those who fight for right must remember St. Augustine's sage words,
"right is right even if no one is doing it...and wrong is wrong even if every one is doing it!"
-----------
Got Causality?
-----------
God, Duty, Honour, Country
-
07-03-2007, 08:02 AM #48
Exactly, if you feel the bible is literal, then you have to make up alot of strange rationalizations to explain it. But with that said, I dont see how you can take it any other way than literal, as I said before, you are compromising your entire religion if you say some parts aren't literal. Because if you do that, then many parts, or all parts could not be literal. How do you know? Either you go 100% or you dont go at all IMO.
"If the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult -- some odd group that is not really interacting with the world"- Evangelical Bible scholar Bruce Waltke
-
-
07-03-2007, 09:45 AM #49
Why would I be compromising my faith if I don't take it as being literal?
That part I don't get. The Catholic Christians believe that the Bishops of the Church in union with the pope, provide the definitive interpretation of the bible not individuals. Orthodox would say something similar (w/o references to the pope)
Often, non-religious fiction contains various truths about human nature, yet just because it is fiction does not make the truth it contains invalid.
I don't get your argumentBut those who fight for right must remember St. Augustine's sage words,
"right is right even if no one is doing it...and wrong is wrong even if every one is doing it!"
-----------
Got Causality?
-----------
God, Duty, Honour, Country
-
07-03-2007, 09:51 AM #50
-
07-03-2007, 09:54 AM #51
Since the sun (and other sources emit light) the concept of light and it's components must have existed before the existance of the light source.
In object oriented program, an object's properties are created before the object is - is that a fitting analogy?Last edited by IdahoViking; 07-03-2007 at 10:33 AM.
Any workout you can walk away from is a good workout.
-
07-03-2007, 09:55 AM #52
-
-
07-03-2007, 10:14 AM #53
You know, eventually it will come down to faith no matter how you slice it.
A little off topic, but eventually, even science lapse into philosophy.
For example, string theory is a mathematical way of describing the universe. There are multiple variant of theory, none of which can really be tested and each of which can describe the observable universe.
(http://www.teachersdomain.org/resour...hil/index.html)
So, to believe in string theory, requires a faith that is untestable.But those who fight for right must remember St. Augustine's sage words,
"right is right even if no one is doing it...and wrong is wrong even if every one is doing it!"
-----------
Got Causality?
-----------
God, Duty, Honour, Country
-
07-03-2007, 10:24 AM #54
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Barrie, Canada
- Age: 36
- Posts: 3,518
- Rep Power: 378
-
07-03-2007, 10:31 AM #55
-
07-03-2007, 10:32 AM #56
I agree that everything requires some kind faith, but science uses less faith and more evidence. Religion on the other hand is mostly faith, and it's scary to follow it when it's a matter of someone's life and death. I really don't care if you believe in God or not, but you shouldn't FORCE other people to do the same. Islam is an example. It tries to control a whole society based on blind faith.
-
-
07-03-2007, 10:37 AM #57
I'm a Christian, but I agree with you - I do not have the right to FORCE my religion on you. I can try to lead by example, I can try to answer questions you may have - but that is where my involvment ends.
That is not to say that I cannot, or should not, use my Christian views to dictate how I vote come election time - after all this is a democracy and Christians are as much part of this democracy as Jews, atheists, etc.Any workout you can walk away from is a good workout.
-
07-03-2007, 10:40 AM #58
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: [he made] the stars also.
this is from the kjv (a little closer to original meaning)
it leaves out the word "then" at the beggining of verse 16
this so now it just says what he did it doesnt give a time refrence the sun could very well have all ready been in exsistance for 3 days
-
07-03-2007, 10:49 AM #59
-
07-03-2007, 10:50 AM #60
Bookmarks