Is the 6-meal-a-day method what a lot of people are doing these days?
I just find it hard to spread out meals that much when you're working and/or tired and so on, how do you guys manage and what's your experience with this versus a few meals a day?
|
-
06-28-2007, 03:33 PM #1
Is the 6-meal a day method just flat-out better than 3-5 meals a day?
-
06-28-2007, 03:58 PM #2
It just seems to keep your metabolism high. What I do when I have real busy days is either cook stuff the night before and have it packaged and ready to go or make a big sandwich, eat half for a meal, then eat the rest 2-3 hours later. I can pretty much always take a 2-5 minute break to finish my quick meal.
-
06-28-2007, 04:17 PM #3
-
06-28-2007, 04:18 PM #4
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Oxnard, California, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 217
- Rep Power: 212
You should of gave a more even range; asking if 3-5 is better than 6 a day, just doesn't sound right.
Next time ask if 3-4 meals is better than 6-7.
But to answer your question, the answer is yes.
Speed up your metabolism, better absorbtion of nutrients from food, will cancel out binging and possible late night cravings.
I just see so many beneficial reasons behind it.
My work gives us 10 minute breaks every 2 hours. And I receive a 1-hour lunch break.
My work-day is 8-5, so my breaks at 10:00 am, 2:00 pm and 4:00 pm consist of apple/peanut butter or a protein bar, it's quick and easy so that I can eat it in 10 minutes.
So I have it good.
Not everyone else is as lucky as I though.Working off 10 years of del-taco is hard.
-
-
06-28-2007, 04:25 PM #5
-
06-28-2007, 04:35 PM #6
Don't forget...your body cannot store protein. So approximately every 3-4 hours your body has used up the protein from your previous meal. Once it runs out, it has to resort to breaking down muscle as a source of amino acids for metabolic functions. Eating a balanced meal every 3 hours is very important, but if you absolutely cannot get your carbs or fats in a meal you MUST try to get your protein to prevent muscle loss.
So, eating every 3 waking hours is very important in order to prevent muscle loss. This works out to be about 6-7 meals per day.
-
06-28-2007, 05:05 PM #7
-
06-28-2007, 05:27 PM #8
-
-
06-28-2007, 06:12 PM #9
-
06-28-2007, 06:58 PM #10umm... who told you that?
"Your body doesn't have the ability to store proteins. Amino acids only remain in your bloodstream for about three hours after each meal. After that, you go into a state called negative nitrogen balance, a condition in which you are burning up your own muscle protein. That is why it's crucial to eat a meal with protein every three hours."
-Tom Venuto, professional natural bodybuilder
http://64.62.135.218/images/uploads/tom-venuto-3.jpg
-
06-28-2007, 11:56 PM #11
-
06-29-2007, 12:08 AM #12
-
-
06-29-2007, 04:25 AM #13
IMO, 3 meals is not enough...even 4 is pushing it, but anything over 4 is fine...if you can break it down into more meals, it will probably be better for speeding up your metabolism, but it may not even have enough of an effect to notice...whatever works for your body, you have to find out...if you're having trouble I'd say shoot for 5, but if you can get 6 great...don't worry too much about it as there have been studies done that prove it doesn't even make that much of a difference
-
06-29-2007, 07:13 AM #14
-
06-29-2007, 08:43 AM #15
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Catonsville, Maryland, United States
- Posts: 178
- Rep Power: 313
If I only had 3 meals a day, it would be hard to get enough calories in, even on a cutting diet. As it is I can barely eat more than 700 clean calories in a single meal, so smaller, more frequent meals works well.
The biggest thing is the metabolism boost. You'll find that you can eat more food/calories total in a day, but you don't eat as much at a single meal.
I think in general as long as you don't go too long without food, you should be fine. Like, don't eat lunch at noon and then nothing else until dinner at 6 - that is the worst! Even just a light snack in between will help keep your metabolism up and running.March 2007: 190 lb, ~25% bf
June 2007: 170lb, ~20% bf
Jan 2008: 180 lb, 18% bf
Mar 2008: 190 lb, 18% bf
July 2008: 185 lb, 15% bf
2009 - 2022: Stopped training due to life circumstances - slowly got fat
November 2022: 220lb, 30% bf
January 2023: 200lb, 25% bf
Goal(Long Term): 180lb, 10%bf
-
06-29-2007, 09:31 AM #16
-
-
06-29-2007, 10:13 AM #17
-
06-29-2007, 10:14 AM #18
-
06-29-2007, 10:40 AM #19
-
06-29-2007, 10:54 AM #20
-
-
06-29-2007, 07:27 PM #21
-
06-30-2007, 12:40 AM #22"Your body doesn't have the ability to store proteins. Amino acids only remain in your bloodstream for about three hours after each meal. After that, you go into a state called negative nitrogen balance, a condition in which you are burning up your own muscle protein. That is why it's crucial to eat a meal with protein every three hours."
-Tom Venuto, professional natural bodybuilder
Personally, I don't think the number of meals matters that much. Total calories and appetite surpressants are the most important things IMO.
-
06-30-2007, 01:11 AM #23
- Join Date: Oct 2001
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,600
- Rep Power: 72795
tom is incorrect. when you eat protein in a whole meal (ie not just by itself) but with carbs & fat digestion is slowed significantly... with whey as the only protein source amino acids are still elevated above baseline 5 hours post meal. Amino acid availability does not ensure elevated protein synthesis. My research has shown this specifically
-
06-30-2007, 01:15 AM #24
-
-
06-30-2007, 01:19 AM #25
After the aminos leave the bloodstream and enter cells, do you have any idea how long the cells have aminos 'on hand'? I can't see the cells using them up right away either. I suppose it would depend on how desperate they were at the time, but I wonder if its generally minutes or sometimes upwards of hours?
-
06-30-2007, 12:13 PM #26
-
06-30-2007, 01:57 PM #27
-
07-01-2007, 09:19 PM #28
Bookmarks