HST or SCT?

TheMind · 09-01-2004, 10:02 AM

I know most people here just go and do exercises....so far in my experience I do as well. However, I was looking at the possiblity of starting a different program, and was considering both Hypertrophy-Specific Training(HST) [www.Hypertrophy-Specific.com] and Static Contraction Training(SCT) [http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/sisco6.htm]

My goal is size more than anything, actual strength isnt really important to me, although I'll appreciate the strength t hat comes with size.

I've done research on both of these, although I've never done either of them.

What are you opinions, which one is a better option? Does SCT truly work for size, or just isometric strength? It is currently the most appealing, but still holds somewhat of a "too good to be true" label....shorter time in the gym and greater gains? Hard to swallow without seeing some proof that is provided via a source other than the author.

Dont give me a lecture on "be hardcore, lift raw, 6 sets of 30 with 400lbs, 8 days a week" or anything stupid, im asking about opinions on these two programs, not a criticism of my thoughts of trying one of these programs.

Thanks for the help

hepennypacker52 · 09-01-2004, 10:14 AM

HST.

Teflon · 09-01-2004, 10:35 AM

Definetly HST. Although SCT is interesting, I think if someone was focusing on building muscle, it's more guided toward strength and power. Personally I don't think you can go wrong by using both.