Heya guys, I'm looking to buy a weight gainer, but I'm not sure which of the two to get, Cyto Gainer or BSN True Mass. Cyto has less calories from fat, but has glutamine and creatine (Which I think is great!), but BSN has more calories total but MUCH of it is from fat. Is it better to use a gainer that has more or less calories from fat, BSN has 60 more calories per serving than Cyto by the way. Thanks guys, and you have have used either or both, tell me also what you think
!
-Steve
|
|
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Cyto Gainer vs. BSN True Mass
-
06-15-2007, 01:19 PM #1Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Caledon, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 33
- Posts: 65
- Rep Power: 210
Cyto Gainer vs. BSN True Mass
-
06-15-2007, 01:21 PM #2intensity
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 3,859
- Rep Power: 1427
That cytogainer is AMAZING. It tastes great, and has helped me put on some weight. Which, to say the least is amazing because I have a high metabolism.
I really recommend their chocolate. Their vanilla isn't half bad either.
Before you make your decision, check the cholesterol on that there BSN... some companies slip in quite a bit of it.
-
06-15-2007, 01:43 PM #3Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2004
- Age: 36
- Posts: 2,595
- Rep Power: 3147
Cytogainer no contest.
Less fat, less sugars, less hype, less crazy claims, less marketing scheme.Kill the Hype.
-
06-15-2007, 02:21 PM #4
I can't give you comparative results because I have never taken True Mass but the Cytogainer has worked very well for me and tastes good too. I have chocolate malt or something like that.
-
-
06-15-2007, 02:23 PM #5ahhhhh jahhhhh!
- Join Date: May 2005
- Age: 41
- Posts: 199
- Rep Power: 233
you should try cytosport muscle milk collegiate. it is basically like cytogainer but with way less cholestorol per serving and seems to have a better texture.
-
06-15-2007, 02:57 PM #6Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Caledon, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 33
- Posts: 65
- Rep Power: 210
How many times a day did you guys use this product? Once, twice, three times? Thanks.
-
06-15-2007, 03:04 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Reality (Seriously..some people)
- Posts: 4,433
- Rep Power: 2356
True Mass ftw!!!
Go ahead and wake up, it's a brand new day
Angel's wings gunna carry you away...
-
06-15-2007, 03:10 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Posts: 537
- Rep Power: 292
I agree with you. Cytogainer chocolate malt is excellent. Low price, great taste and mix well.Originally Posted by Tyler8635
), but BSN has more calories total but MUCH of it is from fat. Is it better to use a gainer that has more or less calories from fat, BSN has 60 more calories per serving than Cyto by the way. Thanks guys, and you have have used either or both, tell me also what you think 
! 
Bookmarks