I read today that yates didn't do BB squats from 1986 onwards due to a hip injury.
As one of his alternatives he did smith machine squats!
I've read a lot of articles by Pro's recentrly and they all seem to use the smith machine for something or other but the general opinion on here is that it's not a good idea.
Why?
|
Thread: Barbell squats and Dorian Yates
-
07-27-2004, 12:28 PM #1
- Join Date: Apr 2004
- Location: Fazeley, Staffordshire, UK
- Posts: 1,105
- Rep Power: 281
Barbell squats and Dorian Yates
http://www.myspace.com/nicholaseasey
-
07-27-2004, 12:32 PM #2Originally posted by Five
The difference between the smith machine and a free weight bench press is significant in terms of overall gains. There are several important neurological factors at play here:
balance proprioception: In every exercise you do there is an element of balance, or to put it more technically a feedback loop that constantly adjusts recruitment of agonist, antagonist and synergists in order to maintain the desired output. This is a facet of the CNS, so it's centrally controlled and can be improved by using primarily free weight exercises, and even more so by using CKCE exercise, closed kinetic chain exercises. Squats on the smith machine would be a very seriously bad idea, as squatting is THE exercise which improves balance proprioception to the greatest extent. For bench press it's less of a concern, but it's still a concern.
Other than the effect on the CNS, the fact is that using EMG study and simply common sense, a free weight bench press recruits more muscle fibres it's as simple as that. The body does not and cannot hypertrophy on the scale of an individual muscle, the synergists of that muscle must also hypertrophy or the body would be in a constant state of imbalance and injury.
force proprioception: force proprioception is another attribute that operates both peripherally and centrally, and boils down to this, how heavy does an exercise feel and in what is the specific adaption required to deal with that force? Many people erroneously think that the squat is the king of exercises because of hormone release, which obviously is completely wrong, the actual amount or change in hormone release whilst squatting is insignificant. If you want to release a lot of test go to bed, if you want to release a lot of GH go do some endurance training. The real power of squatting is that as a load bearing exercise is has an extremely strong effect on the force proprioception of the CNS.
Although you may be able to apply a RPE (rating of percieved effort) of 100% to both smith bench and free weight bench, or in other words you will be pushing with everything you have for both exercises. The actual response of the body will be quite different given the demands of the exercise. It just isn't true that load is load is load no matter what the source is, the body can tell a cable from a free weight from a machine.
In terms of injury I don't believe that it matters, it's not WHAT you do it's HOW you do it that determines injury rates. The body can adapt to cope with almost anything.
-
07-27-2004, 12:47 PM #3
Re: Barbell squats and Dorian Yates
Originally posted by niceasey
I read today that yates didn't do BB squats from 1986 onwards due to a hip injury.
As one of his alternatives he did smith machine squats!
I've read a lot of articles by Pro's recentrly and they all seem to use the smith machine for something or other but the general opinion on here is that it's not a good idea.
Why?
-
07-27-2004, 01:11 PM #4
-
-
07-27-2004, 04:11 PM #5
-
07-27-2004, 04:53 PM #6
-
07-27-2004, 05:29 PM #7Originally posted by Defiant1
The pros have MAJOR concerns about tendon/ligament injuries due to the type/amount of drugs they use. The muscle basically out strips the tendon/ligament strength; while the drugs make the tendons/ligaments weaker.
I think this explains their exercise choice a lot.
that, plus it's cool to load up like 10+ plates on a machine for a photo shoot
-
07-28-2004, 06:48 AM #8
-
-
07-28-2004, 06:50 AM #9Originally posted by Defiant1
The pros have MAJOR concerns about tendon/ligament injuries due to the type/amount of drugs they use. The muscle basically out strips the tendon/ligament strength; while the drugs make the tendons/ligaments weaker.
I think this explains their exercise choice a lot.
-
07-28-2004, 07:54 AM #10
-
07-28-2004, 08:37 AM #11
- Join Date: Jan 2003
- Location: Bristol, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 53
- Posts: 545
- Rep Power: 263
Re: Barbell squats and Dorian Yates
Originally posted by niceasey
I've read a lot of articles by Pro's recentrly and they all seem to use the smith machine for something or other but the general opinion on here is that it's not a good idea.
Go to another site and you'll get another opinion.
The real funny part is everyone thinks there right even though they disagree.
Smith squats worked for him, along with many other non-pros. Try them and decided for yourself."Pain is a state of MIND -
- Mass is a state of BEING"
This one is my own.
-
07-28-2004, 08:43 AM #12
- Join Date: Jun 2004
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 45
- Posts: 95
- Rep Power: 242
It all depends on what you feel works the best for you. Don't let others tell you how to workout if you feel these things work for you. It all takes time to figure out what's good and bad for you.. trial and error... in my case I was born with a spinal defect which when I squat down even without weight it's impossible for my back to stay straight or I will fall over backwards as funny as it sounds... the smith machine is a godsend for me..
-
-
07-28-2004, 08:59 AM #13
-
07-28-2004, 09:03 AM #14
Bookmarks