I feel like i'm not responding to the monoydrate as well as the first time I used it. Slight gains in strength and no size gains. I go two months on and one month off. I weigh 234lb and use 5 to 10 grams daily on cycle usually without loading. I read albeit in an ad that non responders to monohydrate fair better with the citrate/effervescant formula. Is it worth trying the citrate formulas or not? Thought of tring EAS ribo force or the new met-rx formula. Currently use ultimate nutrition creapure. Any help appreciated.
|
|
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: creatine monohydrate vs. citrate
-
11-26-2001, 08:20 AM #1Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2001
- Location: Houston
- Posts: 351
- Rep Power: 274
creatine monohydrate vs. citrate
-
11-26-2001, 09:23 AM #2Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2001
- Posts: 2,066
- Rep Power: 26096
don't listen to anything you read in an add, you are big guy, take 10g everyday, you are not responding as much because as you advance your progress will undoubtedly slow down. That's just the way it is. In addition I would take longer cycles, at least 3 months.
-
11-26-2001, 10:33 AM #3Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2001
- Location: Houston
- Posts: 351
- Rep Power: 274
Thanks for the response. Greatly appreciated.
-
05-20-2002, 10:45 AM #4Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2002
- Location: In a C130 Flying High
- Posts: 145
- Rep Power: 287
Whats the difference
I seen an advertisement about creatine citrate.
Using the mighty fine search button, I found this post. However, it does nto answer my question of "What is the difference between the two?"
Anybody know the difference or have a link to a page that explains it?
Thanks.Rangers Lead the Way!
Never shall I fail my comrades I will always keep myself mentally alert, physically strong, and morally straight and I will shoulder more than my share of the tasks whatever it may be one hundred percent and then some.
Bookmarks