When i squat, i go as low as possible where my ass is almost touching the ground. is that bad for the knees? hyper ??
|
Thread: Full squats bad for the knees?
-
05-05-2004, 04:39 PM #1
-
05-05-2004, 05:32 PM #2
-
05-05-2004, 05:49 PM #3
go as low as possible. minimum depth is parallel; if you're inflexible like me get comfortable at parallel then slowly each work lower it bit by bit.
also try working w/ box squatting if you're really inflexible; that helped me a lot
but basically go as low as comfortably possible, no bouncing, and you're fine.
-
05-05-2004, 08:10 PM #4
-
-
05-05-2004, 09:12 PM #5
I personally can't go much past parallel because of my previous knee problems, so it's definitely a subjective thing, and if it hurts, not doing it might be a good idea.
Safety concerns aside though, you've got to also keep in mind what muscle groups you want to put stress on. I go down to, not only where my knees allow, but also to the point where my quads stop working. Any lower and my glutes and hams take over. And hypertrophy in my ass is not what I'm going for.
The most important thing is not to become someone who does huge weights and then squats a total ROM of 3" and thinks they are the ****.Leg day is a good day
-
05-05-2004, 09:20 PM #6Originally posted by reFLEX
I personally can't go much past parallel because of my previous knee problems, so it's definitely a subjective thing, and if it hurts, not doing it might be a good idea.
Safety concerns aside though, you've got to also keep in mind what muscle groups you want to put stress on. I go down to, not only where my knees allow, but also to the point where my quads stop working. Any lower and my glutes and hams take over. And hypertrophy in my ass is not what I'm going for.
The most important thing is not to become someone who does huge weights and then squats a total ROM of 3" and thinks they are the ****.
-
05-05-2004, 09:43 PM #7Originally posted by reFLEX
I personally can't go much past parallel because of my previous knee problems, so it's definitely a subjective thing, and if it hurts, not doing it might be a good idea.
Safety concerns aside though, you've got to also keep in mind what muscle groups you want to put stress on. I go down to, not only where my knees allow, but also to the point where my quads stop working. Any lower and my glutes and hams take over. And hypertrophy in my ass is not what I'm going for.
The most important thing is not to become someone who does huge weights and then squats a total ROM of 3" and thinks they are the ****.
actually regardless of how low you go, you'll get some glute work....gluts work with femur extension, so any squat upphase will work them
-
05-06-2004, 05:08 AM #8Originally posted by hyp3r3xt3nsion
if you want to focus on your quads more there's more efficient was like front squatting and zercher squatting
Note: its not like my knees are way ahead of my feet, you can say they are almost the same level, just that my knees are SLIGHTLY ahead
-
-
05-06-2004, 10:26 AM #9
-
05-06-2004, 11:25 AM #10
- Join Date: Jun 2003
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,184
- Rep Power: 2109
from http://www.johnberardi.com/updates/j...3/na_myths.htm
Myth #2: Full Squats (below parallel) Are Bad For The Knees
More squat myths?!?
We’ve all heard it, if you dip below parallel during a squat, your kneecap will blow off and land in the front desk girl’s mocha latte. Well it just ain’t true! What’s that, you need a little more evidence? Ok boys and girls, its time for today’s episode of Fun With Musculoskeletal Anatomy.
The knee has four main protective ligaments that keep the femur from displacing on the tibia (ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL). These four ligaments are most effective at their protection during full extension and full flexion. Full extension would be when you are standing; full flexion would be when there is no daylight between your hamstring and your calf. When the knee is at 90 degrees of flexion (the halfway point), these four ligaments are almost completely lax and cannot exert much if any of a protective force at the knee (Zatsiorsky V. Kinematics of human motion. 1998 - published by Human Kinetics - p.301).
Unfortunately, the position where the protective ligaments of the knee are not doing any protecting is the common recommended stopping point of a squat. Therefore, as it as it turns out, this is the exact worst place you could reverse the motion under load.
If flexibility allows (heels staying planted, torso not flexing forward past 45 degrees), then a full squat where you lower yourself all the way to the ground is far safer on the knees than the traditional half squat. Guess what joint angle most leg extension machines start at? If you said 90 degrees, give yourself a pat on your healthy knee. This makes a full squat even safer than a leg extension machine (Wilk K et al. A comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces and electromyographic activity during open and closed kinetic chain exercises. Am J Sports Med; 24(4):518-527).
So am I telling you never to do parallel squats? No! Am I saying that you’ll injure yourself on a parallel squat? No, again! What I’m trying to do is simply make an argument for the safety of full squats, thereby relegating squat myth #2 to the fiery pits of hades.
-
05-06-2004, 04:36 PM #11Originally posted by hyp3r3xt3nsion
if you want to focus on your quads more there's more efficient was like front squatting and zercher squatting
(btw bigpoppaproppy, I know that the glutes don't suddenly activate below parallel or anything, but I do know that when I've tried going deep, which I have, it hasn't felt to me like my quads have been doing much extra, just my glutes. not saying it'll feel that way for everyone, just what I've found)Leg day is a good day
Bookmarks