ok.. i talked to a nutritionist yesterday and she said a carb is a carb is a carb.. doesnt make a difference AT ALL. so.. i presented her with a question... if two IDENTICAL twins.. or a body double.. everything the same.. metabolic rate... muscle mass.. activity... they both take in the same calories to maintain body fat.. but, one of them does all their carbs in sugar liquid form.. and the other does it is some sort of complex carb form... same ratios with all protein fat and carbs though.... she said that there will be no difference in body fat stored at all.. if they both cut kcals, they would both lose weight.. she basically said that the only difference is the vitamins you wouldnt be getting from the complex carbs.. now i would like to think that there is a thermic effect of foods.. also i would like to think that spiking insulin levels too fast will lead to more fat to be stored.. but i might be wrong.. can anyone explain??
|
Thread: high sugar/complex carbs
-
04-19-2007, 06:57 AM #1
high sugar/complex carbs
5'9"
176 lbs
squats: 320x6
Deadlift:355x6
Military:135x5
B.S. in Exercise Science from Ball State University
-
04-19-2007, 07:42 AM #2
To a very large extent, she's right.
There are a few large scale studies out there which show that what affects weight loss is either total calories or total carbs, but the gi of the carbs is pretty much irrevelant. However, the low gi carbs tend to be the ones you find in less processed food that contain more natural nutrients, so you should be better nourished and healthier, and the high gi carbs tend to be in the sort of processed fast food which is also full of transfats and strange additives.
I personally think that the argument breaks down a bit when it comes to fibrous vegetables. I don't believe the body handles 200 cals of broccoli the same as 200 cals of sugar, but I don't have any recent research to back that up.65% fat, 30% protein, 5% carbs = keto.
http://www.eileengormley.com/ Funny science fiction for bodybuilders
-
04-19-2007, 07:44 AM #3
Sounds to me that someone gets paid to not know what the hell they are talking about in full. Plagues most industries, but anyhow...
The glycemic index from different carbs will certainly have a huge effect upon the "carb = carb" debate. If you were to take in no other carbs but refined sugar (even if you made up the vitamins and such with other supplementation) it would be a completely different diet than taking in all of your carbohydrates from say green beans, grapefruit, etc.
Comparing nutrition labels, yeah sure it's all the same, but we all know better than that. Excess sugar will be stored in fat, and the chances of that happening with high GI foods is much greater, somewhat regardless of caloric intake.
*Insulin inhibits the mobilization of fat that is already stored in your body. Read up on the effects of insulin and glucagon. Definitely a must read, even for someone that can be called an "expert.""In order to survive you, I must first survive myself. I can sink no further and I cannot forgive you. There's no choice but to confront you, to engage you, to erase you."
-
04-19-2007, 08:12 AM #4
-
-
04-19-2007, 08:12 AM #5
For a week, Get your 200g of daily carbs from fruit juice, donuts/cakes/pastries and french fries. You will look soft, and you will retain a bunch of preservatives and water under your skin. Do it for a week.
Then for the next week, take in 200g of carbs from yams, oats, brown rice, and green vegetables. You will look and feel noticeably different. Harder, more cut, and less bloated.You are born with a spark; to search for the truth, for the best you can be. Practice. Disipline. Preparation. Try and try again. Then one day you are on top and they say you are an overnight success, a natural. You smile, you know. - Anonymous
Burning desire to get out of bed in the morning!!
Even the BEST were taught by someone who knows more than them!
-
04-19-2007, 08:19 AM #6
-
04-19-2007, 08:23 AM #7
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Sugar Land, Texas, United States
- Posts: 2,816
- Rep Power: 644
Simple carbs really can mess with insulin. I think the problem comes where they usually make you more hungry and when you do go over it has a far greater impact. Plus I really don't Calories in/out is completely all thats going on. For instance your body might need something other than sugar and will take energy from muscle and store the sugar as fat.
-
04-19-2007, 12:03 PM #8
-
-
04-19-2007, 02:21 PM #9
-
04-19-2007, 02:34 PM #10
-
04-19-2007, 03:23 PM #11
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Massachusetts, United States
- Posts: 5,936
- Rep Power: 6020
That's because everyone on this forum think they are a nutritionist. They believe they know everything, there statements are impervious, they all studied Carbohydrates and proteins and fats. Went into labs and observed the molecule structure of a carbohydrate .
How many people do you think could answer these questions on the top of their head, without searching online.
1. Explain the differences
Sucrase > Sucrose
Maltrase > Maltose
Lactase > Lactose
2. Explain the process behind production of High fructose corn syrup.
3. Explain the process of a carbohydrate digesting, more specifically, the Biomacromolecules .
4. Explain the role process of a hormone called Glucagon.
Please don't interpret I am claiming no one on this board know's anything intelligent , a lot of people on here know the fundamental basic of nutrition.
But those who have had the pleasure of studying Nutrients in a lab, taken numerous classes pertaining to nutrition from professors who are extremely credible in the nutrition field, know what they are talking about.
If she is a certified nutritionist, then she know's what she is talking about.
If she has a BA degree from U.C Berkeley, then she REALLY knows what she is talking about
Bookmarks