I know it's always good for variety to do both. I've been using only DB's for quite a while now, and have made good progress, but the gym I go to only goes up to 100# DB's, and I am doing those for bench press for 4 sets of 6, so just about ready to move up in weight and will need to hit the BB's. I work out early, so I don't have a partner or a spotter.
Is there a generally recognized conversion factor for DB's to BB's, as in you should be able to do (x) amount more on BB's than the equivalent DB's? I have a physical therapist here at work that says you can usually do about 20% more with a BB than you can with DB's. Is that accurate, or is she full of S***.
|
Thread: Bb Vs. Db
-
04-17-2007, 08:21 AM #1
Bb Vs. Db
-
04-17-2007, 08:27 AM #2
-
04-17-2007, 08:43 AM #3
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 58
- Posts: 0
- Rep Power: 0
This topic was discussed in a Muscle and Fitness from 2 months ago. They decided to test it to determine the percentage decrease going from BB to DB in Bench Pressing. I don't have the issue with me, but I think 20% decrease from BB to DB was a number in that issue. You are wanting the opposite info, but personally I feel a 20% increase is low (each person is different) since you already have the stabilizer muscles built.
For me - I alternate dumbells and barbells all the time. I can do 8 reps @75 lbs on the dumbell. The next workout when I use the barbell, I can do 8 reps @ 205 (35% increase)"Your life is defined by its opportunities... even the ones you miss."
-
04-17-2007, 09:28 AM #4
Bookmarks