ok if any1 caught raw last night JR wouldnt stop talkin about batista size saying he must bench 500 lbs and so on then JR runs his mouth on and on saying batista is 6'5 318 lbs and cut , remeber 318 lbs then on the comercail advertising ARMAGADEN it says batista a 6'5 270 lb beast and in big letters saying 6'5 270lbs how in the hell could some gain 48lbs in 2 weeks or better yet how bad can the wwe lie about size
|
|
Results 1 to 30 of 175
Thread: the big batista lie
-
12-09-2003, 12:17 PM #1
the big batista lie
Favorite Supps
1. Food
2. 100% Whey
3. Gplenish
4. V.2
5. Multi
p.s. Don't tell me to search because if I ask I already did!
-
12-09-2003, 01:04 PM #2Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2003
- Posts: 374
- Rep Power: 539
the wwe lies about size all the time. i remember back in the day when the GIANT Gonzalez was said to be over 9 feet tall.
..
-
12-09-2003, 01:14 PM #3Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2003
- Age: 46
- Posts: 63
- Rep Power: 250
I got 2 words for you
Cell-tech Nitro-tech
jk
-
12-09-2003, 03:33 PM #4Pat Bateman is my hero!
- Join Date: Mar 2003
- Location: BIG D
- Age: 43
- Posts: 215
- Rep Power: 258
Batista is definitly over 300 lbs and has been since entering wwe....don't know about his height though,, did see taker at american airlines b4 sseries, and he was large and TALL! I'm 6'1" and 238... there is no way in hell Batista is only 32 lbs heavier than me, just an advertising **** up.....
-
-
12-09-2003, 03:36 PM #5Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 56
- Rep Power: 270
No way. They said he was like 7'8" or something.Originally posted by brother33
the wwe lies about size all the time. i remember back in the day when the GIANT Gonzalez was said to be over 9 feet tall.
-
12-09-2003, 04:05 PM #6Train smarter not harder
- Join Date: Dec 2001
- Age: 41
- Posts: 15,166
- Rep Power: 13071
no, i also remember him being billed as like 9ft., hehe, funny ****Originally posted by FireSpirit
No way. They said he was like 7'8" or something.Booo
-
12-09-2003, 04:34 PM #7
I think batistas WIDE frame fools everyone into thinking hes well over 300.
Hes wide yes but hes very ripped and not especially thick.
I dont think hes 300.
Do you rememver goldberg gorilla pressing him?
Quite a feat if batista really is 320 but i doubt it.
You will notice that goldberg presses EVERY opponent he CAN.
The only people ive never seen him press in WWE are mark henry and kane.
SO we can assume kane is heavier than batista,which would make him 340/350?
See it doesnt add up
-
12-09-2003, 04:40 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2001
- Location: australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 3,765
- Rep Power: 5276
the truth about batista...
6'5? not even close...
300?...
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071203/01.jpg
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071103/01.jpg"Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
- Bruce Lee
"My studying mimics my training. Brief, intense and infrequent.."
- Big Red
-
-
12-09-2003, 07:30 PM #9Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: usa
- Posts: 24,260
- Rep Power: 2810
if they are going to 'lie' they should keep thier bs straight at least
-
12-09-2003, 09:27 PM #10Train smarter not harder
- Join Date: Dec 2001
- Age: 41
- Posts: 15,166
- Rep Power: 13071
Re: the truth about batista...
huh, he doesn't look that impressive in those shotsOriginally posted by Buff_Daddy
6'5? not even close...
300?...
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071203/01.jpg
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071103/01.jpg
Booo
-
12-09-2003, 09:34 PM #11I bent my wookie
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: sydney australia
- Posts: 10,210
- Rep Power: 2879
Re: Re: the truth about batista...
No roids in those pictures. Damn he must be 230 tops in those pics.Originally posted by amusclehead
huh, he doesn't look that impressive in those shots
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄█$$ BIG MONEY BALLERS $$ █▄▄
▌ ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌ ▐
-
12-09-2003, 09:39 PM #12Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Never ever ever ( did I say ever? ) always take wrestling stats as even *remotely* close to the real deal.
I know many won't believe me ... but I'm telling ya the Big Show is about 6'7 1/2'' or so. It's just ridiculous. There's grossly exagerrating and then there's wrestling stats ...
I've never seen Batista in person ... I'd automatically say screw the 6'5'' though ... he's probably no doubt more like 6'3'' - 6'4'' tops. No way in hell is he 318. I'd say he's probably really in the 280s.
Wrestling is all a show ... the thing is ... they LOOK as big as the WWE says on ppv ... tv ... heck even to most people in the arena istself. To people at ringside though it's blatantly obvious it's all bs but they're a small minority so it's not really a problem is it?
Personally I think the stats should all be legit. If they want wrestling to be as realistic as possible they could at least have real stats lol!
-
-
12-09-2003, 09:46 PM #13I bent my wookie
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: sydney australia
- Posts: 10,210
- Rep Power: 2879
Jay
In relation to the 2 pics posted, Batista is alot bigger than that today. Who knows when those pics were taken. You can by looking at his chest that he is small in those pics as compared to today. Batista has a very large wide chest.
Now you have the Big Show at 6'7? If he is 6'7 then Brock Lesnar is 5'8!!! Have you seen Lesnar and Show in the ring together????????????? Lesnar comes up to just below Shows neck.▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄█$$ BIG MONEY BALLERS $$ █▄▄
▌ ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌ ▐
-
12-10-2003, 02:56 AM #14Of The Clan Of Christ.
- Join Date: Apr 2003
- Location: United Tesco
- Age: 38
- Posts: 5,605
- Rep Power: 1614
Re: Re: Re: the truth about batista...
that explains it.Originally posted by soleus
No roids in those pictures. Damn he must be 230 tops in those pics.Isaiah 43:2: When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers they shall not overflow you. When you walk through the fire, you shall not be burned, Nor shall the flame scorch you.
-
12-10-2003, 03:53 AM #15Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
I didn't actually look at those pics but will check them out now I have time. Yeah I know he's as wide as a 747.Originally posted by soleus
Jay
In relation to the 2 pics posted, Batista is alot bigger than that today. Who knows when those pics were taken. You can by looking at his chest that he is small in those pics as compared to today. Batista has a very large wide chest.
Now you have the Big Show at 6'7? If he is 6'7 then Brock Lesnar is 5'8!!! Have you seen Lesnar and Show in the ring together????????????? Lesnar comes up to just below Shows neck.
Hehe ... well don't flame me ... I said already most won't believe me about the Big Show ( oneday I'll prove it though ) ... but for real man ... when Big Show stood in the aisle right next to me at ringside my first thought was WTF this guy is 6'6'' or something!!!!
Now Admitedly he's a little taller than that ... it was just the sheer suprise of seeing how tall he really is ... I mean I was expecting him to be friggin' 6'11''. He's not even close. If he stood up straight he'd be 6'7 1/2'' - 6'8'' ... slouched over like he frequently is he's a little less. One of the security guards who was working ringside I know is 6'4'' & the Big Show wasn't a heck of a lot taller than him. Show would have about 6'' on Lesnar maybe. All the pics in the magazines, on tv ... they're mostly taken at angles that deliberately accentuate the size of the larger wrestlers. It's a totally different story ringside in person. Man, I really will have to get a photo with him oneday so you guys can see how tall he really is
EDIT - I saw those pics of Batista just then. I don't think they're too old ... taken when he was out with an injury last year I think. He's probably really around 6'3'' like I said ... it's a safe bet Tito Santana isn't really 6'2''. Hard to believe that's Batista he's so damn small there ... damn ... he must only be in the 230s in those pics. The difference in width especially is staggering.Last edited by jay81; 12-10-2003 at 04:04 AM.
-
12-10-2003, 04:12 AM #16Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2001
- Location: australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 3,765
- Rep Power: 5276
Originally posted by soleus
In relation to the 2 pics posted, Batista is alot bigger than that today.
true... i checked... those pics were taken july this year i think... he must have been taking time off then... and from the sauce too...
but i still thought it would be a cool post just to see how big of a diifference there is in weight compared to now.. in just a few months
i mean he is bigger than goldberg now, so hed have to be about 270.... hed also be about 6'2 without boots.Last edited by Buff_Daddy; 12-10-2003 at 04:17 AM.
"Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
- Bruce Lee
"My studying mimics my training. Brief, intense and infrequent.."
- Big Red
-
-
12-10-2003, 04:26 AM #17Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Batista is only 6'2'' without boots? Even '' I '' would think he's a little taller than that!Originally posted by Buff_Daddy
true... i checked... those pics were taken july this year i think... he must have been taking time off then... and from the sauce too...
but i still thought it would be a cool post just to see how big of a diifference there is in weight compared to now.. in just a few months
i mean he is bigger than goldberg now, so hed have to be about 270.... hed also be about 6'2 without boots.
-
12-10-2003, 05:01 AM #18Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2001
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 1,166
- Rep Power: 21431
Re: the truth about batista...
Damn!. Now Afa is still a big guy, but Tito Santana is as big as him, now thats disappointing.Originally posted by Buff_Daddy
6'5? not even close...
300?...
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071203/01.jpg
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071103/01.jpg
Dan101Original board member since 1999
-
12-10-2003, 05:11 AM #19Banned
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Canada
- Age: 37
- Posts: 1,092
- Rep Power: 0
Kane is no way heavier than Goldberg. Kane is 280 at best, and Goldberg is 283. And you're right, Batista is like 280 because last Raw, we could see there isn't a big difference between him and Orton, or maybe it was the camera angles. Who knows.Originally posted by Pumped
I think batistas WIDE frame fools everyone into thinking hes well over 300.
Hes wide yes but hes very ripped and not especially thick.
I dont think hes 300.
Do you rememver goldberg gorilla pressing him?
Quite a feat if batista really is 320 but i doubt it.
You will notice that goldberg presses EVERY opponent he CAN.
The only people ive never seen him press in WWE are mark henry and kane.
SO we can assume kane is heavier than batista,which would make him 340/350?
See it doesnt add up
-
12-10-2003, 05:12 AM #20Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2001
- Location: australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 3,765
- Rep Power: 5276
Originally posted by jay81
Batista is only 6'2'' without boots? Even '' I '' would think he's a little taller than that!
he could be 6'3 but definately not 6'5"Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
- Bruce Lee
"My studying mimics my training. Brief, intense and infrequent.."
- Big Red
-
-
12-10-2003, 05:45 AM #21Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Yeah I agree he is about that ... he sure does pass as 6'5'' + easy in most pics though. Tito Santana was always billed as 6'2'' & he wasn't that tall ... I remember he wasn't that much taller than Shawn Michaels from their match at Wrestlemania 8.Originally posted by Buff_Daddy
he could be 6'3 but definately not 6'5
-
12-10-2003, 07:31 AM #22Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: Great Britain
- Age: 40
- Posts: 3,308
- Rep Power: 0
Bump on that.Originally posted by soleus
Jay
In relation to the 2 pics posted, Batista is alot bigger than that today. Who knows when those pics were taken. You can by looking at his chest that he is small in those pics as compared to today. Batista has a very large wide chest.
Now you have the Big Show at 6'7? If he is 6'7 then Brock Lesnar is 5'8!!! Have you seen Lesnar and Show in the ring together????????????? Lesnar comes up to just below Shows neck.
Anyways... JR always bull****s.
It's his job to to put over wrestlers & make them out to be more than they are.
They say the steps weigh 200-500lbs to sell the move.
Does JR automatically know every wrestlers weight? He just bull****s to put them over.
-
12-10-2003, 08:35 AM #23
Hey guys, weight is relative to every person. Im 5'8'' and i weight 270 lbs and i wear 36 size pants. I am a little fat but nothing to really worry about. So batista could easily weight over 300.
-
12-10-2003, 08:47 AM #24Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Re: the big batista lie
Pretty bad ...Originally posted by waterholic
or better yet how bad can the wwe lie about size
-
-
12-10-2003, 09:23 AM #25Train smarter not harder
- Join Date: Dec 2001
- Age: 41
- Posts: 15,166
- Rep Power: 13071
they're really inflated how much the steps weight then; i remember long time ago they said they weighed 50pds.Originally posted by dude544
Bump on that.
Anyways... JR always bull****s.
It's his job to to put over wrestlers & make them out to be more than they are.
They say the steps weigh 200-500lbs to sell the move.
Does JR automatically know every wrestlers weight? He just bull****s to put them over.Booo
-
12-10-2003, 12:08 PM #26
how in the hell did batista get so big in the pics he looked like a normal guy with some muscle now hes a FREAK
Favorite Supps
1. Food
2. 100% Whey
3. Gplenish
4. V.2
5. Multi
p.s. Don't tell me to search because if I ask I already did!
-
12-10-2003, 02:20 PM #27Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2002
- Location: Durham, NC
- Age: 45
- Posts: 402
- Rep Power: 281
Re: the truth about batista...
Woah... Give me 2 doses of whatever Batista took. Are you all sure those pics were taken in 2003? Damn.. a HUGE difference!Originally posted by Buff_Daddy
6'5? not even close...
300?...
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071203/01.jpg
http://www.demon-wrestling.com/galle.../071103/01.jpg
-
12-10-2003, 03:00 PM #28I bent my wookie
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: sydney australia
- Posts: 10,210
- Rep Power: 2879
Re: Re: the truth about batista...
Massive Massive difference. His arms and chest look "tiny" compared to what they are today. I dont know what he has been taking, or how many chicken breasts he has eaten, but DAMN!Originally posted by Cappadonna21xxx
Woah... Give me 2 doses of whatever Batista took. Are you all sure those pics were taken in 2003? Damn.. a HUGE difference!▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄█$$ BIG MONEY BALLERS $$ █▄▄
▌ ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌ ▐
-
-
12-10-2003, 05:05 PM #29Contrarian Tide
- Join Date: Jan 2003
- Location: USA
- Posts: 5,524
- Rep Power: 1432
I remember them saying the Big Show was like 7'6" at first in WCW and the WWE saying Giant Gonzalez was 8 ft. tall (i don't remember them saying 9 but i wouldnt doubt it!).
"Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac." -Henry Kissinger
"Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster . . . for when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Friedrich Nietzsche
-
12-10-2003, 05:12 PM #30Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2002
- Location: Smackdown Hotel
- Age: 40
- Posts: 0
- Rep Power: 0
You've just got look at him next to Orton...Orton dwarfs him in height and he's only billed as 6'4 so go figureOriginally posted by Buff_Daddy
he could be 6'3 but definately not 6'5
I really believe Orton is 6'4 though..he's very lanky lolIf ya smell...what the rock...is cookin!
Bookmarks