for shoulders i start with seated military press, and i always bring the bar down in front of my head. i see almost every one else do it behind the head, what do you suggest?
|
-
01-06-2004, 01:16 PM #1
-
01-06-2004, 01:16 PM #2
-
01-06-2004, 01:48 PM #3
-
01-06-2004, 03:18 PM #4
-
-
01-06-2004, 04:36 PM #5
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: Washington, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 370
- Rep Power: 1211
i disagree
do them but do them right. if you are gonna load up and bang em out like crazy without good form coz the guy next to can do it that way then you are asking for trouble, don't workout like dumbass. they are an excellent way to build up your shoulders, just start out light, use good form and don't let the ego get in the way. i do presses to the front and back, started doing em to the back early last year and can now do my bodyweight x 6. i'm 200 pounds.
-
01-06-2004, 04:40 PM #6
-
01-06-2004, 04:51 PM #7
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Porto Alegre BRAZIL
- Age: 45
- Posts: 6,762
- Rep Power: 6890
By definition military press is done standing and to the front and bump to the guys , no behind neck .......
5'11 @ 220lbs.
Disclaimer: This is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way, shape, or form encourage use nor condone the use of any illegal substances or the use of
legal substances in an illegal manner. The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only and shall not take the place of qualified medical advice
-
01-06-2004, 04:57 PM #8
-
-
01-06-2004, 06:49 PM #9
-
01-06-2004, 06:56 PM #10
-
01-06-2004, 07:00 PM #11Originally posted by 15yOmOnStEr
If you go behind the neck it won't be considered military press any more it is behind the neck press. It is IMO the best mass builder for rear delts. There is not really any need for direct work to the front delts b/c they are pretty much directly hit on chest day(bench,incline,dips)
http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/ShouldWt.html
-
01-06-2004, 07:04 PM #12
-
-
01-06-2004, 07:04 PM #13
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Porto Alegre BRAZIL
- Age: 45
- Posts: 6,762
- Rep Power: 6890
Originally posted by ripped_holla
I think military press hits the front delts. That's why it's listed under "anterior" deltoid, not "posterior".
http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/ShouldWt.html5'11 @ 220lbs.
Disclaimer: This is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way, shape, or form encourage use nor condone the use of any illegal substances or the use of
legal substances in an illegal manner. The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only and shall not take the place of qualified medical advice
-
01-06-2004, 07:52 PM #14
Re: i disagree
Originally posted by Flipexed
do them but do them right. if you are gonna load up and bang em out like crazy without good form coz the guy next to can do it that way then you are asking for trouble, don't workout like dumbass. they are an excellent way to build up your shoulders, just start out light, use good form and don't let the ego get in the way. i do presses to the front and back, started doing em to the back early last year and can now do my bodyweight x 6. i'm 200 pounds.
-
01-06-2004, 07:55 PM #15Originally posted by ripped_holla
I think military press hits the front delts. That's why it's listed under "anterior" deltoid, not "posterior".
http://www.exrx.net/Lists/ExList/ShouldWt.htmlBooo
-
01-06-2004, 08:46 PM #16
-
-
01-06-2004, 08:54 PM #17
-
01-07-2004, 07:40 AM #18
I've done both, and honestly I like behind the neck better, however, as the weight increased, my ROM behind the neck decreased. I stay to the front now, where I can keep a full ROM with a heavy load. It really does go back to flexability, and a safe bet for beginners is to stay to the front, or use dbs. IMO.
-
01-07-2004, 08:55 AM #19
-
06-25-2013, 06:21 AM #20
-
-
06-25-2013, 06:29 AM #21
-
06-25-2013, 03:05 PM #22
Military Press = standing overhead press without any body English.
A century ago they did that totally upright with the heels together, like you were standing to attention(hence "military" press).
But that meant you were more concerned with maintaining balance than actually putting up a heavy barbell. So it was a waste of time(like squats on a busu ball today).
So the term came to mean a strict standing overhead press(stable foot placement, usually around hip to shoulder width), to distinguish it from:
1. Push press, with a leg drive to start the bar from the clavicles.
2. Jerk, with tremendous leg drive but no "press out" to finish.
3. Olympic press, with a lot of lean back and body English to start the bar up, another lay back to catch the bar, but no bending of the legs allowed.
A seated military press is a contradiction in terms, because it is not standing.
If you have the flexibility, then press behind the head/neck is a great movement. Of course you can do it seated.
Olympic lifters, who do overhead squats, full squat snatches, snatch balance exercises etc, have the flexibility to do presses behind the neck with no problems. They do them standing up, like God/Odin/Crom intended we should be man enough to do that.
If you don't have that kind of flexibility, then in front is recommended for your "seated press". Any reason why you don't do it standing? Just curious?Last edited by jgreystoke; 06-25-2013 at 03:10 PM.
Beginners:
FIERCE 5:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=159678631
Beyond novice, 5 3 1 or see above:)
Unless it is obvious to anyone who isn't blind that you lift weights, you might still benefit from a little more attention to big basic barbell exercises for enough reps:).
-
06-25-2013, 08:55 PM #23
-
06-25-2013, 08:57 PM #24
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Posts: 9,830
- Rep Power: 4166
used to do seated, behind the neck press
now i do standing, in front of the neck pressThe muscles i value most are the ones directly surrounding the spine, the hips, the scapula, the femur and the tibia... in that order.
Basically the whole body minus chest and biceps... pretty much the opposite of what your local gym looks like on a typical Monday.
Bookmarks