seriosuly that is a HUGE DIFERENCE how in the hell he gain about 50-60lbs of lean mass
|
|
Results 31 to 60 of 175
Thread: the big batista lie
-
12-10-2003, 06:49 PM #31Favorite Supps
1. Food
2. 100% Whey
3. Gplenish
4. V.2
5. Multi
p.s. Don't tell me to search because if I ask I already did!
-
12-10-2003, 09:10 PM #32Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Orton probably really is around 6'4'' but they've probably got him in lifts also like they did with Edge, maybe to make him seem more imposing due to his smaller build.Originally posted by TheRock
You've just got look at him next to Orton...Orton dwarfs him in height and he's only billed as 6'4 so go figure
I really believe Orton is 6'4 though..he's very lanky lol
-
-
12-10-2003, 09:11 PM #33Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Muscle memory + juice.Originally posted by waterholic
seriosuly that is a HUGE DIFERENCE how in the hell he gain about 50-60lbs of lean mass
-
12-10-2003, 09:32 PM #34I bent my wookie
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: sydney australia
- Posts: 10,210
- Rep Power: 2879
What? like orange juice? Or Tomato juiceOriginally posted by jay81
Muscle memory + juice.▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄█$$ BIG MONEY BALLERS $$ █▄▄
▌ ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌ ▐
-
12-10-2003, 09:47 PM #35Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: usa
- Posts: 24,260
- Rep Power: 2810
are you blind?Originally posted by bboyremy
Kane is no way heavier than Goldberg. Kane is 280 at best, and Goldberg is 283. And you're right, Batista is like 280 because last Raw, we could see there isn't a big difference between him and Orton, or maybe it was the camera angles. Who knows.
Kane is heavier then Goldberg
I'd say by at least 30 lbs
I think Cena weighs more then Goldberg
if you look at them both they are comparable size wise and cena has very little bodyfat
cena is probubly heaveier then goldy
and Kane definatly is
-
12-10-2003, 09:50 PM #36I bent my wookie
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: sydney australia
- Posts: 10,210
- Rep Power: 2879
I agree with what you say, except that i dont think Cena is heavier than Goldy locks. Goldy is very thick and would have a couple of inches on Cena which also helps the weight.Originally posted by Kane Fan
are you blind?
Kane is heavier then Goldberg
I'd say by at least 30 lbs
I think Cena weighs more then Goldberg
if you look at them both they are comparable size wise and cena has very little bodyfat
cena is probubly heaveier then goldy
and Kane definatly is
I would take Cenas body over Goldy though.▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄█$$ BIG MONEY BALLERS $$ █▄▄
▌ ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌ ▐
-
-
12-10-2003, 09:55 PM #37Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: usa
- Posts: 24,260
- Rep Power: 2810
cruel ironyOriginally posted by jay81
Orton probably really is around 6'4'' but they've probably got him in lifts also like they did with Edge, maybe to make him seem more imposing due to his smaller build.
the taller someone is at a given weight the leaner they look
making someone look like they are allleg dosn't make them more intimidating
-
12-11-2003, 04:13 AM #38Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
The juice you stick in your ass packed full of vitamin sOriginally posted by soleus
What? like orange juice? Or Tomato juice
-
12-11-2003, 04:15 AM #39Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
True but height does play a role in the intimidation factor, albeit mostly taking second place to size & thickness however.Originally posted by Kane Fan
cruel irony
the taller someone is at a given weight the leaner they look
making someone look like they are allleg dosn't make them more intimidating
-
12-11-2003, 04:41 AM #40Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Big Show was billed as 7'4'' when he first came onto the scene in WCW ( an EIGHT INCH exagerration! ).Originally posted by BigKazWSM747
I remember them saying the Big Show was like 7'6" at first in WCW and the WWE saying Giant Gonzalez was 8 ft. tall (i don't remember them saying 9 but i wouldnt doubt it!).
Yeah you're right, Giant Gonzalez was never billed as 9 feet tall ... but frequently WWE announcers would claim he was 8 feet tall. An interesting tidbit is I had the Giant Gonzalez action figure toy & on the back of the box ( I still have it ) it says he is 7'7''. His legitimate height is about 7'5 1/2'' I think. I Heard he was 7'6 1/2'' in shoes ... that was in the NBA and the olympics ( he competed for Argentina in '88 games ) so I think that figure could be trusted. His listed weight when he played for the Atlanta Hawks for a short while was 325lbs ... he no doubt bulked up a little for wrestling. WWE billed him as 460lbs ... his real weight was probably about 360.
Come to think of it, Giant Gonzalez is about the only legitimate seven footer I could name off the top off my head in wrestling history. Andre the Giant ( probably really 6'10'' in his prime '' ), Big Show ( Well I told yas how tall he really is
), Kevin Nash ( w-a-y under 7'0'' ), Giant Silva ( really around 6'10'' ), Uncle Elmer ( 6'10'' also ) ... none of those guys reached or exceeded seven feet in height.
-
-
12-11-2003, 07:03 AM #41Still singing the same old songs huh.Originally posted by jay81
Big Show was billed as 7'4'' when he first came onto the scene in WCW ( an EIGHT INCH exagerration! ).
You dont like being proved wrong do you.
As someone already mentioned,If bigshow is only 6,8 then why is he a full head taller than lesnar.
If lesnar 5'10?
You seem to be ignoring things like this despite them blowing your estimations to smithereens.
If taker is only 6'5 1/2 then why is he a few inches taller than hogan?
If hogan is 6'3 then why is he a few inches taller than brock lesnar?
Nothing you say adds up
-
12-11-2003, 07:36 AM #42Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
You haven't proved anyone wrong.Originally posted by Pumped
Still singing the same old songs huh.
You dont like being proved wrong do you.
As someone already mentioned,If bigshow is only 6,8 then why is he a full head taller than lesnar.
If lesnar 5'10?
You seem to be ignoring things like this despite them blowing your estimations to smithereens.
If taker is only 6'5 1/2 then why is he a few inches taller than hogan?
If hogan is 6'3 then why is he a few inches taller than brock lesnar?
Nothing you say adds up
Hogan is about 6'3 1/2''. Hogan a few inches taller than Lesnar? Man, get real.
I was looking at a pic of Show staring down Lesnar just this afternoon in a WWE year book and the 6 inches I said Show would have on Lesnar looked about right ...
-
12-11-2003, 08:01 AM #43Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2003
- Location: Belgium
- Posts: 367
- Rep Power: 252
I still remember big show sometime is listed as 7'5 and sometimes like 7' WWE wrestling is a world of lies and bull****
Last edited by the nice monste; 12-11-2003 at 08:05 AM.
-
12-11-2003, 11:02 AM #44In law school
- Join Date: Feb 2003
- Age: 35
- Posts: 669
- Rep Power: 294
For the truth, go to http://www.wwfmirrorimages.com
Big Show is 7' 1"
Brock Lesnar is 6' 3"
Rey Mysterio is 5' 3"
simple as that
-
-
12-11-2003, 11:09 AM #45Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Yeah ... rightOriginally posted by ealvintan
For the truth, go to http://www.wwfmirrorimages.com
Big Show is 7' 1"
Brock Lesnar is 6' 3"
Rey Mysterio is 5' 3"
simple as that
-
12-11-2003, 11:18 AM #46Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: Great Britain
- Age: 40
- Posts: 3,308
- Rep Power: 0
The truth?Originally posted by ealvintan
For the truth, go to http://www.wwfmirrorimages.com
Big Show is 7' 1"
Brock Lesnar is 6' 3"
Rey Mysterio is 5' 3"
simple as that
The truth is..
The WWE superstars have some very good looking wives!
-
12-11-2003, 11:24 AM #47Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: Great Britain
- Age: 40
- Posts: 3,308
- Rep Power: 0
damn..look at vince in this picOriginally posted by dude544
The truth?
The truth is..
The WWE superstars have some very good looking wives!
-
12-11-2003, 02:33 PM #48I bent my wookie
- Join Date: Mar 2002
- Location: sydney australia
- Posts: 10,210
- Rep Power: 2879
I have to agree with this comment.Originally posted by Pumped
Still singing the same old songs huh.
You dont like being proved wrong do you.
As someone already mentioned,If bigshow is only 6,8 then why is he a full head taller than lesnar.
If lesnar 5'10?
You seem to be ignoring things like this despite them blowing your estimations to smithereens.
If taker is only 6'5 1/2 then why is he a few inches taller than hogan?
If hogan is 6'3 then why is he a few inches taller than brock lesnar?
Nothing you say adds up
Jay i know your heart is in the right place, and you did see most of the guys close up in Perth, but damn, not alllllll wrestlers are 5'10. There are some guys that are actually TALL. I watched WM16 last night and i saw Bradshaw walking out with Farooq. Bradshaw had a good 3 inches on Farooq. Now i dont want to hear about the "cameras filming at certain angles" blah blah blah. Fact of the matter is that Bradshaw is a good 6'5 no dramas.
I go back to the Kurt Angle experiment...he is a good 5'11 no more no less, and when he is "nose to nose" with Brock you can clearly see that Lesnar is at least 6'3.▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄█$$ BIG MONEY BALLERS $$ █▄▄
▌ ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌ ▐
-
-
12-11-2003, 04:06 PM #49Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2001
- Location: australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 3,765
- Rep Power: 5277
Originally posted by ealvintan
For the truth, go to http://www.wwfmirrorimages.com
Big Show is 7' 1"
Brock Lesnar is 6' 3"
Rey Mysterio is 5' 3"
simple as that
hahah, more like for a good laugh"Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
- Bruce Lee
"My studying mimics my training. Brief, intense and infrequent.."
- Big Red
-
12-11-2003, 04:10 PM #50Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2001
- Location: australia
- Age: 39
- Posts: 3,765
- Rep Power: 5277
Originally posted by jay81
You haven't proved anyone wrong.
Hogan is about 6'3 1/2''. Hogan a few inches taller than Lesnar? Man, get real.
I was looking at a pic of Show staring down Lesnar just this afternoon in a WWE year book and the 6 inches I said Show would have on Lesnar looked about right ...
hogan is about 6'4 or could be 6'3.5 as you said.. hes about the same height as the rock... also triple h is atleast 6'3"Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
- Bruce Lee
"My studying mimics my training. Brief, intense and infrequent.."
- Big Red
-
12-11-2003, 08:55 PM #51Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Bradshaw isn't 6'5'' unless I am too :\ ( I'm a hair under 6'3'' like I said )Originally posted by soleus
I have to agree with this comment.
Jay i know your heart is in the right place, and you did see most of the guys close up in Perth, but damn, not alllllll wrestlers are 5'10. There are some guys that are actually TALL. I watched WM16 last night and i saw Bradshaw walking out with Farooq. Bradshaw had a good 3 inches on Farooq. Now i dont want to hear about the "cameras filming at certain angles" blah blah blah. Fact of the matter is that Bradshaw is a good 6'5 no dramas.
I go back to the Kurt Angle experiment...he is a good 5'11 no more no less, and when he is "nose to nose" with Brock you can clearly see that Lesnar is at least 6'3.
I will post a pic or two later today or tomorrow so you fellas can see what I mean.
-
12-11-2003, 09:53 PM #52Were you nose to nose with him?Originally posted by jay81
Bradshaw isn't 6'5'' unless I am too :\ ( I'm a hair under 6'3'' like I said )
I will post a pic or two later today or tomorrow so you fellas can see what I mean.
No you werent.
Looking at him from a couple meters away is not accurate and would be deceiving.
-
-
12-11-2003, 11:06 PM #53Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Location: usa
- Posts: 24,260
- Rep Power: 2810
it's hard to tell w/out seeing them in ring togetherOriginally posted by soleus
I agree with what you say, except that i dont think Cena is heavier than Goldy locks. Goldy is very thick and would have a couple of inches on Cena which also helps the weight.
I would take Cenas body over Goldy though.
or ideally like face to face
but honetly I think cena is heavier then goldberg
-
12-11-2003, 11:18 PM #54What planet are you from.Originally posted by Kane Fan
it's hard to tell w/out seeing them in ring together
or ideally like face to face
but honetly I think cena is heavier then goldberg
Cena is tanked but his frame is a LOT smaller than goldberg plus hes at least 3 inches shorter.
He a pretty stumpy guy.
At least 40 pounds between them.
Probably 20 in the legs alone.
-
12-12-2003, 07:37 AM #55Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
You are right about Goldberg being considerably larger than Cena. Cena was announced as 220lbs in Perth and it looked right to me. Goldberg is a hell of a lot bigger than 220 ( or even 240 ) I'm sure. Cena is very ripped though which does give the appearance of him being larger than 220 on tv.Originally posted by Pumped
What planet are you from.
Cena is tanked but his frame is a LOT smaller than goldberg plus hes at least 3 inches shorter.
He a pretty stumpy guy.
At least 40 pounds between them.
Probably 20 in the legs alone.
Cena isn't a short guy by any means however either, he's quite tall actually. A good 6'1''. Think he's just got short limbs that give him a more stumpy appearance.
-
12-12-2003, 05:48 PM #56Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2002
- Location: Smackdown Hotel
- Age: 40
- Posts: 0
- Rep Power: 0
I have to agree.Originally posted by soleus
I have to agree with this comment.
Jay i know your heart is in the right place, and you did see most of the guys close up in Perth, but damn, not alllllll wrestlers are 5'10. There are some guys that are actually TALL. I watched WM16 last night and i saw Bradshaw walking out with Farooq. Bradshaw had a good 3 inches on Farooq. Now i dont want to hear about the "cameras filming at certain angles" blah blah blah. Fact of the matter is that Bradshaw is a good 6'5 no dramas.
I go back to the Kurt Angle experiment...he is a good 5'11 no more no less, and when he is "nose to nose" with Brock you can clearly see that Lesnar is at least 6'3.
You say you've seen them from ringside but i've had ringside tickets before and its not an accurate way to determine people's heights.
I have met a bunch of these guys in person..backstage at Tour de Force Brock Lesnar was standing right next to me on his cell phone! He IS 6'3!! I have friends who are 6'2 i have friends who are 6'4..hell I even have one that is 6'7...Brock easily has one over my 6'2 friends!
I was also on the plane to New York from Seattle the Raw after WM and wrestlers were in our plane. Hurricane is at least 6 foot..I may even venture to say 6 and a half, 6'1. He's not very big though. Spike is about 5'10. Had a hair over me.
The Big Show is a tower! I wouldn't wanna guess how tall he is. The Rock is 6'4.
Rhyno is 5'10
This thread is getting old...If ya smell...what the rock...is cookin!
-
-
12-12-2003, 09:32 PM #57Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
Hogan is well under 2 inches taller than Lesnar ...
http://www.brocksolid.com/photo_subs...sub/wwe12.html
Angle was 5'10'' ( no doubt has lifts in the WWE giving him the height a 5'11'' guy would have in boots ) at the '96 Olympics. There is no way Lesnar is more than 3 inches taller than him as you can clearly see.
http://www.brocksolid.com/photo_subs...sub/wwe13.html
In reply to the Rock, guys exagerrate their height all the time. I could easily say I'm 6'3'' ( I'm close enough & look taller than what I really am ) in person but am always completely honest & accurate. Lesnar is a legit 6'2'' ... but no taller than that.Last edited by jay81; 12-12-2003 at 09:34 PM.
-
12-12-2003, 09:50 PM #58Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2002
- Posts: 7,308
- Rep Power: 1570
If you can prove Bradshaw is really 6'5'' I'll send you a cheque for $250.Originally posted by Pumped
Were you nose to nose with him?
No you werent.
Looking at him from a couple meters away is not accurate and would be deceiving.
My money is safe though because there's no way in hell he is.
No, I wasn't nose to nose with him. There was only a guard rail seperating us ... I mean how much closer could I have gotten to the guy? Any closer and I woulda been humping his side lol! The ground was completely level where the wrestlers were standing next to me ... there were no rises or depressions anywhere that could have given any discrepancies ... believe me I quad-tripple checked. He's way under 6'4'' let alone friggin' 6'5''.
-
12-12-2003, 10:48 PM #59Banned
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Canada
- Age: 37
- Posts: 1,092
- Rep Power: 0
Fact is Kane has a ****ty body, and you can't accept it. Did you see Kane/Goldberg on Raw? It's not just the difference of heights, Goldberg dwarfs Kane. And there's no way Cena is bigger than Goldberg. You're the one who's blind.Originally posted by Kane Fan
are you blind?
Kane is heavier then Goldberg
I'd say by at least 30 lbs
I think Cena weighs more then Goldberg
if you look at them both they are comparable size wise and cena has very little bodyfat
cena is probubly heaveier then goldy
and Kane definatly is
-
12-13-2003, 06:30 AM #60He looks an inch taller in those pics and take away an inch for brocks hair since hogan is bald and you have 2 inches.Originally posted by jay81
Hogan is well under 2 inches taller than Lesnar ...
http://www.brocksolid.com/photo_subs...sub/wwe12.html
Dont forget you shrink as you get older and hogan is 50+
), Kevin Nash ( w-a-y under 7'0'' ), Giant Silva ( really around 6'10'' ), Uncle Elmer ( 6'10'' also ) ... none of those guys reached or exceeded seven feet in height.
Bookmarks