Stemming from the frequent observation that cigarette smokers tend to maintain lower body weights than their non-smoking counterparts. In this issue of Chemically Correct, we take an in-depth look at the science behind one of the world's most popular drugs.
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/par16.htm
HOW TO REVIEW: Post Your Review Of This Article - CLICK ON POST REPLY BELOW! You do NOT need to be a registered member to post a reply in this section!
|
|
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
06-12-2003, 05:08 PM #1The Dude
- Join Date: Aug 2002
- Location: Nampa, Idaho, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 9,178
- Rep Power: 9190
Par Deus & Friends - Chemically Correct: Nicotine.
-
07-16-2003, 02:50 PM #2UnregistereGuest
I found this article incredibly helpful in examining nicotine as it relates to fitness and weight loss from an objective, scientific point of view.
Most of us know already know all about the diverse array of negative impacts smoking has on our health, but can't provide a reasonable explanation as to why smoking curbs appetite. This article provides a thorough analysis of the chemical mechanism(s) behind this.
Thank you for the insightful article.
-
07-25-2003, 12:58 AM #3
good article.
i am considering its use
-
09-20-2005, 05:45 PM #4UnregisteredGuest
one word BORNINGGG!!!
-
-
11-07-2009, 12:17 PM #5Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 7
- Rep Power: 0
I found this article very helpful without all the dogmatic, unsubstantiated bigotry towards nicotine. I understood why nicotine, and cigarettesmoking, has help me and others loos body fat. Unfortunately, smoking reeks havoc on the ability of hemoglobin topick up oxygen as well as other pulminary functions. Using nicotine is a radical idea but looksas if this drug has it's uses.
-
11-27-2009, 12:29 PM #6I grunt
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Greenwich, Connecticut, United States
- Age: 49
- Posts: 10,605
- Rep Power: 70108
I wish I knew what that word was so I could agree or disagraeeeaOriginally Posted by Unregistered
-
11-27-2009, 12:32 PM #7I grunt
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Greenwich, Connecticut, United States
- Age: 49
- Posts: 10,605
- Rep Power: 70108
I don't care what this article says about it. I have seen this drug kill two of my grandparents. They both lost about 75 lbs from cancer. This has no place in my body. I don't have any hatred towards those that smoke, many of my friends do, however there are many other ways to get some of the benefits people are looking for from nicotine
-
11-27-2009, 08:21 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 44
- Posts: 5
- Rep Power: 0
Actually
Its the tar from cigarettes that does most of the damage, not the nicotine...they now have electronic cigaretees out that have no tar or anything in them, just nicotine. So other than being addicted to nicotine it doesn't seem to have any really harmful side effects. I'm a smoker and I'm thinking of switching over to those for the health benefits and to eventually ween myself off them entirely...Originally Posted by pharmamarketer
-
-
06-25-2013, 03:57 AM #9Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: New Westminster, BC, Canada
- Posts: 3,331
- Rep Power: 53196
interesting article. Took me while deciphering all the lingo, had to google almost every term. Learned a lot while doing so. So, summing it up, apart from destoying lungs which is related to administration by smoking, and highly addictive nature, nicotine is actually a good thing, right?
Bookmarks