|
-
03-25-2024, 04:46 PM #31
-
03-25-2024, 05:31 PM #32
As bad as his lies are, his inability to admit to them are even worse. But those aren’t even the things that caused me to stop engaging with him. It was his behavior in the red meat leads to diabetes thread. I mean, his goal of trolling was pretty apparent…but after seeing how he acted in that thread where he actually agreed with posters, it was obvious that attempting to engage in any type of meaningful discussion with him is futile. Best to just laugh at him, occasionally point out his hypocrisy and/or lies, and move on.+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
-
-
03-25-2024, 05:59 PM #33
-
03-25-2024, 06:07 PM #34
Not sure if it's been mentioned but the NHS in the UK has done a 180. No more giving kids hormone blockers. Most of Europe has done a 180 or close to it when it comes to kids and being transjesters. The 'gender affirming care' ($$$$$$) grift apparently will take more time to fall out of favor here in the US.
The reality that it doesn't change suicidality among confused kids hasn't made the rounds here, so there are still doctors here guilting parents into transitioning their kids under the guise of they'll kill themselves if you don't go with the ploy. Any doctor still saying that should have their license suspended for awhile.Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
-
03-25-2024, 06:38 PM #35
-
03-25-2024, 06:39 PM #36
-
-
03-25-2024, 06:53 PM #37
And just lol at beavercels getting called out for lying, then immediately lying again.
Claims I was adamant about the study when I didn’t even post in the thread. As stated, just business as usual for Canada’s favorite troll. Just remember everyone…this is how obnoxious he tries to be even if he agrees with you.
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...hp?t=184307613
Imagine wasting any time whatsoever trying to have a meaningful conversation with him.+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
-
03-25-2024, 06:58 PM #38
No cares about that rube. Whatever is the new establishment from government he'll defend. And yeah the US definitely caught on late to stop recommending the jabs to anyone who wasn't old or with a high risk condition compared to the rest of the world. Per most of the world the pandemic was over in spring 2022 but the US officials waited until a few months after China opened back up to declare the pandemic over.
"The pandemic is over." -US health officials, politicians 2023
"Yeah we knew that a long time ago." -everyone with common senseLight weight! Light weight baby!!!!
-
03-25-2024, 07:25 PM #39
-
03-25-2024, 07:40 PM #40
-
-
03-25-2024, 07:43 PM #41
-
03-25-2024, 07:51 PM #42
I don't see an explicit acknowledgement of a mistake - but that's par for the course. Recall you danced around for two pages and multiple edits before you admitted that you fudged the numbers by two decimal points.
Any comments on why you have issues explicitly acknowledging "mistakes" you make?
Still lulzy tho
-
03-25-2024, 07:52 PM #43
-
03-25-2024, 07:55 PM #44
-
-
03-25-2024, 08:04 PM #45
"my bad
idiom
used for saying that you accept that you are wrong or that something is your fault:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...english/my-bad
-
03-25-2024, 08:10 PM #46
-
03-25-2024, 09:11 PM #47
-
03-26-2024, 01:57 AM #48
-
-
03-26-2024, 03:29 AM #49
-
03-26-2024, 03:32 AM #50
-
03-26-2024, 03:35 AM #51
-
03-26-2024, 03:39 AM #52
-
-
03-26-2024, 03:49 AM #53
You lack of trust doesn’t stem from the fact he blocked you, your lack of trust stems from you disagreeing with what he is saying. If he said something you agree with you’d trust it 100%.
As mentioned in the article:
The raw files have been published in a report called The WPATH Files: Pseudoscientific surgical and hormonal experiments on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults, which contains analysis by journalist Mia Hughes that puts the WPATH Files in the context of the best available science on gender distress.
Environmental Progress has made all files available to read at the end of the report. The leaked files include screenshots of posts from WPATH’s internal messaging forum dating from 2021 to 2024 and a video of an internal panel discussion.
So feel free to go read all of it and watch the video if you’d like.+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
-
03-26-2024, 03:50 AM #54
-
03-26-2024, 03:55 AM #55
-
03-26-2024, 03:56 AM #56
Nope. I've seen climate advocates also misunderstand the science too. It bothers me when people forget these are atmospheric physics questions. They aren't about feelings.
Regarding the trans chit, I realize some of those emails make things look bad, but to ultimately determine whether gender affirming care works, you need a lot more data. Most of the studies I have seen suggest it is working better, on average, than not. But I'm not a reproductive medicine doctor so I will defer to their rebuttal, if they make one.
Here is a lay rebuttal I found that at least links some studies contradicting some of the claims presented in your post.
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/f...dRedirect=true
-
-
03-26-2024, 03:58 AM #57
-
03-26-2024, 04:01 AM #58
-
03-26-2024, 04:05 AM #59
Lold at “right-wing activist” and “anti-trans” labels getting immediately thrown around. I’ll look over it, but the bias is already BLATANTLY apparent within the first few lines.
Also…lold at this being the first deboonking they list
For example, one section claims that the WPATH Standards of Care 8th revision “sent shockwaves through the medical profession,” and “provided the catalyst for the Beyond WPATH declaration, now signed by over 2,000 concerned individuals, many of whom are clinicians working with gender diverse young people.” A closer examination of the “Beyond WPATH” letter itself reveals signatories such as “John Howard - DJ” and “Collin Wynter, yoga instructor.” A majority of the signatories appear to be from non-relevant categories, and a significant chunk are not medical providers at all, such as “concerned grandparent” or “parent.” While the report presents the “declaration” as a document of primarily medical professionals, it omits that it is essentially a freely available online petition form.
Omg, they said many of the people who signed it are healthcare professionals, but we found a significant chunk are not healthcare professionals at all!!. BUSTED!!
I’ll continue reading, but that is a perfect example of the hilariously biased “fact-checking” that is so prominent these days. Hopefully the rest is just as funny. Thanks for sharing!+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
-
03-26-2024, 04:05 AM #60
Bookmarks