Why is it that only men think of continuing their "bloodline"?

[Brommando]

Never heard a woman talk in those terms or maybe men have been brainwashed into believing bloodlines exist.

[JayJ350]

For women it's just all about motherhood, they have different motivation than men when it comes to procreation. For men the whole bloodline thing is a big part of it because they keep their family name and have naturally evolved around a desire to spread their seed around. As for women they have a natural desire to simply latch onto high value men that can provide for them and be a mother for children while they are still able to procreate.

[RhysWirral]

Something picked up in the last 100 years emulating the nobility of feudal Europe.

It's interesting when you go back to Rome, they didn't particularly care. They regularly adopted.

[alltrapbrah]

Historically speaking men have had a harder time of it when it comes to reproducing. I can’t remember where I read it but supposedly we’ve all descended from twice as many women as we have men.

So, it’s more of a “success” for men to reproduce, thus maybe that has impacted how we perceive it.

[Komisch]

idk but the idea of impregnating whatever bish i fuk gives me a raging boner.

hnnnng

[N0stradamus]

For the same reason women would rather have sex with dogs than weak men: it's just in their nature.


In Pre-Columbian America, whenever a Native tribe would wipe out another Native tribe, the women and children would willingly go with the conquerors and join their tribe for food, shelter and protection. They couldn't give a f/ck about their tribal bloodline.

And we're seeing the same thing in Ukraine. All those "brave" Ukrainian men are getting massacred by the Russians to defend Ukrainian sovereignty, meanwhile Ukrainian women are living comfortably in Germany getting assistance from the German government and making side income on OF.

Do Ukrainian women say any prayers for their fallen Ukrainian men? I seriously doubt it.

[UGotBullied]

its a common thing in nature with competing males, have as many children as possible so that your competition has fewer. probably largely a by product of natural selection, or is it the chicken or the egg.

the cold callous nature of the female permits that she is happy with her lot provided her offspring is the result of a man who can provide. and if he no longer can, she will raise him with another man. can you imagine being sexually attracted to money lol. what a crux

[r32gojirra]

Follow up question: why is it the only ones that go on about “bloodlines” are bottom-iq untermensch genetic failures like ratfish

[UGotBullied]

Follow up question: why is it the only ones that go on about “blsoodlines” are bottom-iq untermensch genetic failures like ratfish

probably because being bottom of the barrel the realisation that your genes arent capable of producing one the implications are a lot more profound. also maybe its a motivating factor built into our genes.

also jfl @ not wanting your own 'bloodline' brb random men the world over populating with their subpar genetics when you could populate the world with little yous. surely you respect your own mind and iq enough to want make the world a better place with children who will hopefully continue in your steps.

[SUPERH0T]

If this question mystifies you, you are dumb as a fukken rock.

Men who carried genes which made them not care about being cucked were eradicated from the gene pool very quickly.

Women know their offspring are theirs by default, so why would they give a fuk about such a thing?

Also lmao if you think women don't care 100x more about their own children than those not directly related to them.

[Rul3]

brainwashed to believe bloodlines? where do you think got what you look like or certain things about you from?

[Brommando]

Follow up question: why is it the only ones that go on about “bloodlines” are bottom-iq untermensch genetic failures like ratfish

In my opinion bloodlines don't even matter, like your generations down the line won't even know you and your genetic code would be mixed with 3 different genetic lines. So I think it is a flawed concept anyways...

[Brommando]

If this question mystifies you, you are dumb as a fukken rock.

Men who carried genes which made them not care about being cucked were eradicated from the gene pool very quickly.

Women know their offspring are theirs by default, so why would they give a fuk about such a thing?

Also lmao if you think women don't care 100x more about their own children than those not directly related to them.

Not what the conversation is about but y'all miscers can't have a talk without mentioning cuck or incel. Kinda weird

[SoutheastBeast1]

A desperate attempt for immortality by passing your genes on to the next generation.


The harsh truth is you live and die. Continuing your bloodline is cope. It's no different than religiouscels thinking they have a soul that will continue on in heaven after it's over here.

[Duckliver]

A desperate attempt for immortality by passing your genes on to the next generation.


The harsh truth is you live and die. Continuing your bloodline is cope. It's no different than religiouscels thinking they have a soul that will continue on in heaven after it's over here.

That’s a pretty stupid way to look at things. I can see why you would look down on people. Must be sad thinking that’s what it’s about for people.

[userO1ROTHKVUIA]

Something picked up in the last 100 years emulating the nobility of feudal Europe.

It's interesting when you go back to Rome, they didn't particularly care. They regularly adopted.

Roman adoption came from pragmatics and eugenics. Peoples parents often died so they needed a new family and men could choose a promising son to be their heir. Or pretty girls to marry off to make strong connections.

[guest89]

Something picked up in the last 100 years emulating the nobility of feudal Europe.

It's interesting when you go back to Rome, they didn't particularly care. They regularly adopted.

The Romans cared. They just resorted to adoption whenever they couldn't conceive their own heir or if they had a suitable person in mind to carry on their legacy.

For Feudal Europe it was very important for their political system to have a male heir. And the eldest male heir (who inherits it all) was the most important son. Its how families held onto wealth/power. Because if you chop up all your land/holdings every time you have a kid. It just results in a bunch of people who have small holdings.

I think there were similar customs/practices in the middle east as well during that time.

In my opinion bloodlines don't even matter, like your generations down the line won't even know you and your genetic code would be mixed with 3 different genetic lines. So I think it is a flawed concept anyways...

Its not necessarily just about the 'blood line'. Its about the name/legacy. Really successful men tend to be more mindful of these sort of things and in turn raise their sons to be more mindful of these sort of things.

If you are a broke peasant its irrelevant. But when you are a 'somebody' it just means more. Imagine being born into a family in a city where your grandfather/father are well known/respected. You have some level of generational success/wealth. When you are young its instilled in you. That you should be mindful of and proud of who you are. Its important to maintain traditions/blood-lines. Etc.



I know people/families like this. And its definitely something to aspire for. Imagine siring a son (or sons) and in turn they sire sons. Imagine looking around at your sons/grandkids and everyone is super successful. Your wealth enabled them to succeed/dominate. All of your offspring being business owners, doctors, lawyers, judges, politicians, etc. You/ your family having total control of an entire city... Or perhaps a county... Or perhaps an entire state. Everywhere you go your known, respected and given preferential treatment. Basically as close as you can get to royalty/nobility. That's the legacy some people build.




Obviously if you are an incel, broke, work a dead-end job, and won't ever have millions of dollars, real estate, businesses, etc. to pass on its kind of irrelevant. But there are plenty of families like this in a 'young' nation like America that have been forged over the last 100-200 years or so.

[Retoaded]

Thats why I married my sister OP.

[SlimmJimm]

In my opinion bloodlines don't even matter, like your generations down the line won't even know you and your genetic code would be mixed with 3 different genetic lines. So I think it is a flawed concept anyways...

This is a longer discussion. In order to preserve your values or in other words, your "essence", you have to create a family structure that honours family legacy and tradition. This is why many families are billionaires and yours aren't. The most assured way of achieving generational wealth is via passing on of values from generation to generation and to create and environment of family working and doing business together. Your ancestors didn't do this, it seems they have the same mentality that you do now. It's not just about money either, money is just the side affect of family discipline and cohesion. Those who accomplish more together are obviously better bonded than those who do not or cannot accomplish much together. This is also about sacrificing for a greater cause or purpose. If we had the choice to live longer or even live forever most of us would choose it. In the absence of this the next best option is to have our heirs execute our will and values after we are gone. However, if you don't have a vision bigger than your own self you'll have difficulty grasping this concept and your future generations will maintain their status quo continuing the cycle.

[Brommando]

However, if you don't have a vision bigger than your own self you'll have difficulty grasping this concept and your future generations will maintain their status quo continuing the cycle.

So it's not about immortality, it's about wealth and a stable life for the rest of the generations? Okay, that I always understood but in today's day and age I don't think it's soo great to have children. Previously they were were needed to take care of you in old age, if I ever have the capacity to ever amass wealth I would leave it in a trust fund to distribute to people in my family and close community for education.

[Brommando]

Everywhere you go your known, respected and given preferential treatment. Basically as close as you can get to royalty/nobility. That's the legacy some people build.

So it's about wealth and legacy and nothing else? Sure that is my point underlying but some people take it overboard with "You have to have kids or your legacy will die!!!"

[Bigbuster1]

My friend got married and his new wife explained to me that she didn’t/ isn’t taking his last name and is keeping her maiden name because her side of the family all had girls and she wants to carry on the last name.

Make of that what you will lol

[Brommando]

My friend got married and his new wife explained to me that she didn’t/ isn’t taking his last name and is keeping her maiden name because her side of the family all had girls and she wants to carry on the last name.

Make of that what you will lol

I was usually soo pressed when women did that, now i get it's only a surname...

[guest89]

So it's about wealth and legacy and nothing else? Sure that is my point underlying but some people take it overboard with "You have to have kids or your legacy will die!!!"

Mainly about on a legacy. A lot of people like to whine and complain about rich people/people born into generational wealth. But the bottom line is they just had smarter/better great-grandfathers, grandfathers, fathers, etc.


I never really felt the desire to have kids until I hit my mid 30s. Now I can see the appeal. Even if I don't have any until I'm in my 40s or 50s. At some point I'll pop a few out.

My friend got married and his new wife explained to me that she didn’t/ isn’t taking his last name and is keeping her maiden name because her side of the family all had girls and she wants to carry on the last name.

Make of that what you will lol

1. Their kids will have his last name. So her family name dies with her regardless.
2. If he hyphens his kids last name he's a cuck and a loser.
3. Marriage is a traditional institution. The fact that he's going to marry a chick and allow her to keep her last name defies tradition and nullifies the point of marriage.




Even if he doesn't necessarily care about his family name/leaving a legacy. A lot of guys don't. I think its dumb as **** to marry a woman that won't submit/comply to you.

[SUPERH0T]

Not what the conversation is about but y'all miscers can't have a talk without mentioning cuck or incel. Kinda weird

Lots of posts to say "I have defective genes"