The "abortion issue" proves how stupid most people are

[sawoobley]

It's another thing to try and have people tried for miscarriages and try to give physicians the death penalty for medically necessary abortions.

Seems like you believe the propaganda because those things are not happening.

The US, even conservative states, have much looser abortion laws than Europe. But that still doesn't satisfy the American Woman's bloodlust. Our voting population is fuking retarded

The movement to allow abortion until birth is so terribly sick and evil IMO. Who knows what else these people would vote for given the chance.

[Godfrd824]

Seems like you believe the propaganda because those things are not happening.

They are most definitely happening. Doctors are afraid to provide care, and politicians are telling their constituents that the end goal is the death penalty for people who have abortions or doctors who perform them.

The way to beat liberals isn't to out retard them.

[northernlights7]

The fact that people are voting based on their views on abortion, rather than from an economical standpoint, proves how absolutely retarded most people are. Seriously, who dafuq cares about abortion either way? What a completely ridiculous thing to even think about. Can you imagine being so objectively dumb to think: "**** the economy! At least women can get all the abortions they want!" LMFAO

I completely agree.

Minnesota just re-elected a crime lord douchebag based on "muh abortion rights!!!!"

[leafs43]

Well Roe V Wade is gone and it only cost republicans a few seats.

In 3 months, the idiots that voted solely for abortion will forget about the topic altogether.

[Dave22reborn]

Well Roe V Wade is gone and it only cost republicans a few seats.

In 3 months, the idiots that voted solely for abortion will forget about the topic altogether.

Wasn't just a few seats.

It'll also be something they'll bring up in 2024.

[PlanoLifter]

Well Roe V Wade is gone and it only cost republicans a few seats.

In 3 months, the idiots that voted solely for abortion will forget about the topic altogether.

I remember people here saying that by the time midterms came around people would forget about RvW. Turns out they were wrong.

Going forward if anyone threatens to take away abortion access, people will remember. Best thing Rs can do now is propose sensible limits on abortion rather than trying to ban it.

[Dave22reborn]

I remember people here saying that by the time midterms came around people would forget about RvW. Turns out they were wrong.

Going forward if anyone threatens to take away abortion access, people will remember. Best thing Rs can do now is propose sensible limits on abortion rather than trying to ban it.

I don't get it, it was a rallying call for women to vote Democrat.

[tyqb4]

The entire premise of this thread is backwards. There are very few things that will have a greater economic impact on somebody than having a child. Keeping the option of abortion open is the "logical" thing to do according to the OP.

[z4v4]

Republicuks: "No child should be aborted!!!"

Also Republicuks: "Why are there so many dumb liberals!!!"

[Polaris]

Republicuks: "No child should be aborted!!!"

Also Republicuks: "Why are there so many dumb liberals!!!"

Yep.

[Audioslave]

I remember people here saying that by the time midterms came around people would forget about RvW. Turns out they were wrong.

Going forward if anyone threatens to take away abortion access, people will remember. Best thing Rs can do now is propose sensible limits on abortion rather than trying to ban it.

Proposing sensible limits means proposing restrictions. That is an absolute disaster for them if they don't also propose sensible protections for abortion alongside it. Otherwise all voters will see are more restrictions with less protections.

[Dave22reborn]

Hypothetical scenario for some of you. If your one night stand was pregnant and you knew the kid was gonna turn into someone like Bodhy, or NYPAT, or SillieBazzillie, would you still hope she keeps it?

[Audioslave]

Hypothetical scenario for some of you. If your one night stand was pregnant and you knew the kid was gonna turn into someone like Bodhy, or NYPAT, or SillieBazzillie, would you still hope she keeps it?

They don't think about outcomes on this issue. There are posters here who believe all forms of birth control are wrong and immoral. There are some people that cannot be reasoned with on this issue... and I've learned to accept that. Having said that, the majority of voters believe there should be some protection around abortion. And with Roe v Wade overturned and Republicans suggesting restrictions with no protections this will continue to be a losing issue for them.

[Dave22reborn]

They don't think about outcomes on this issue. There are posters here who believe all forms of birth control are wrong and immoral. There are some people that cannot be reasoned with on this issue... and I've learned to accept that. Having said that, the majority of voters believe there should be some protection around abortion. And with Roe v Wade overturned and Republicans suggesting restrictions with no protections this will continue to be a losing issue for them.

But the same people that are against abortion are for Plan B??? Now, of course, unless she's ovulating, she's not getting pregnant, but what if Plan B terminated that pregnancy?

[Audioslave]

But the same people that are against abortion are for Plan B??? Now, of course, unless she's ovulating, she's not getting pregnant, but what if Plan B terminated that pregnancy?

Some are some aren't... and that's why women are concerned about the slippery slope. Because a lot of this depends on each politician's own personal morals... and everyone's are different. And if you're only providing steps to restrict abortion and nothing to protect it, then you keep this an important issue.

Originally they were just going to overturn Roe v Wade to kick it back to the states. Now they've proposed legislation so the federal government can come in and prosecute on abortion... and they don't think women are concerned about a slippery slope? This will continue to be a problem for Republicans because there will continue to be fighting on both sides to both limit and protect abortion... until that gets settled this will continue to have some impact.

[z4v4]

They don't think about outcomes on this issue. There are posters here who believe all forms of birth control are wrong and immoral. There are some people that cannot be reasoned with on this issue... and I've learned to accept that.

These also happen to be the same people that tell other posters to kill themselves and that all liberals should be shot and so on.

[z4v4]

At least you realize you and your ilk all should've been aborted.

Strong reading comprehension. Derp.

[PlanoLifter]

Proposing sensible limits means proposing restrictions. That is an absolute disaster for them if they don't also propose sensible protections for abortion alongside it. Otherwise all voters will see are more restrictions with less protections.

Agree. By stating sensible restrictions I was also implying sensible protections; I clearly could have been more clear.

[Duckliver]

Only 7 countries in the entire world allow abortions past 20 weeks.

We have colleges in court for harvesting aborted fetuses still alive and scalping them and sewing it into rats to see if we can grow hair.

We have doctors testifying the only way to remove late term fetus organs for certain procedures is while the heart is still beating.

We have people being told you can abort up to a week post birth with certain health issues.

Black market fetus price peaks right around then. 100k more versus a few weeks prior.

It’s not a debate about “abortion rights” or “personal rights”. The slippery slope with abortion has gone just as far as the one with gay marriage and now tranny groomers. You are a sick fuk if you don’t realize just how extreme science has been taking playing with fetuses and needing the abortion train to keep its supply up.

[Audioslave]

Agree. By stating sensible restrictions I was also implying sensible protections; I clearly could have been more clear.

I agree with that. Unfortunately, providing protections for abortion will create some friction with some of their base. However, the Republicans are the ones who wanted Roe v Wade overturned, so now they have to deal with the fallout.

But I agree that unless they can meet in the middle on balancing out both restrictions and protection this will just continue to be a losing issue for them.

[Audioslave]

Only 7 countries in the entire world allow abortions past 20 weeks.

We have colleges in court for harvesting aborted fetuses still alive and scalping them and sewing it into rats to see if we can grow hair.

We have doctors testifying the only way to remove late term fetus organs for certain procedures is while the heart is still beating.

We have people being told you can abort up to a week post birth with certain health issues.

Black market fetus price peaks right around then. 100k more versus a few weeks prior.

It’s not a debate about “abortion rights” or “personal rights”. The slippery slope with abortion has gone just as far as the one with gay marriage and now tranny groomers. You are a sick fuk if you don’t realize just how extreme science has been taking playing with fetuses and needing the abortion train to keep its supply up.

1% of all abortions happen past 20 weeks in the USA... and almost all of those are to save the life of the mother or because the baby cannot survive outside the womb. Nobody will care if abortions are banned past 20 weeks because nobody really gets them past 20 weeks... the problem is the Republicans are only providing the bans and not providing protections. If you're only going to restrict it without protecting it, it will still remain a losing issue.