Why is the only objection to using Ivermectin for covid is that it’s not approved.

[tunejunkie]

That’s literally the only objections.

The studies that are out show great signs for helping early covid and prevention.


But when you speak to someone who is pro-covid their only response is that it’s not approved. They have 0 evidence it doesn’t work. Only that it’s not approved

[keyboardworkout]

Big pharma can't make any money with ivermectin.

How about Vitamin D and Zinc? Early info suggested they worked as well or better than the vaccine.

[DrumsNotDead]

if you said ivermectin to the vast majority of people they would not have any idea what you're talking about or that it's even a medicine. remember that most only ever give news articles a cursory glance and then just parrot what they see others on social media platforms saying. very little self study and education is done for anything related to medicine because the media and society has mystified it as something only a doctor could possibly grasp. if you even bring up that you think it could help and provide a basic anatomical/physiological reason why people will dismiss it because you're not a doctor, as if all doctors are up to date on all medical research outside their respective fields.

[FChumChum]

That’s literally the only objections.

The studies that are out show great signs for helping early covid and prevention.


But when you speak to someone who is pro-covid their only response is that it’s not approved. They have 0 evidence it doesn’t work. Only that it’s not approved

So folks won't take the vaccine bc "not approved" but will take ivermectin even though "not approved"?

[5x10]

Good presentation of the data

I’ve encountered people on the internet that will only call it horse medicine, ignoring the 4 billion human doses administered

Also, those that say it’s dangerous to take with covid
Yet those same people rush to take an experimental jab

[MiscInformed]

Nobody on the left has any idea about Ivermectin. It's not discussed on their news channels or in their other news sources. Unless they make an effort to look beyond CNN or MSNBC, they think only what CNN or MSNBC want them to think.

[OT2000]

Big pharma can't make any money with ivermectin.

How about Vitamin D and Zinc? Early info suggested they worked as well or better than the vaccine.

NAC as well. But her der take the vax instead.

[5x10]

So folks won't take the vaccine bc "not approved" but will take ivermectin even though "not approved"?

4 decades worth of a risk profile vs 18 months of questionable risk on the vax

[MiscInformed]

Good presentation of the data

I’ve encountered people on the internet that will only call it horse medicine, ignoring the 4 billion human doses administered

Also, those that say it’s dangerous to take with covid
Yet those same people rush to take an experimental jab

The one argument I've seen is that taking the horse paste could kill you. Of course, what they don't say is their assumption you're so dumb you'd take the full horse dose which is designed for a 1200lb animal, instead of correctly taking only 1/6th of the dose which is what would be safe for a 200lb man. It is this sort of slipperiness that all of their concerns about veterinary ivermectin rely upon. If you buy the correct veterinary versions and know how to calculate correct human dosages, the veterinary stuff is the same as the stuff you'd get with a human prescription. So why would you need the veterinary stuff? Because a lot of pressure is being applied on doctors right now NOT to write prescriptions for ivermectin for human patients.

[5x10]

I don't think it's even 18 months yet, it's barely more than a year.

youre correct! 18 months of covid

[5x10]

The one argument I've seen is that taking the horse paste could kill you. Of course, what they don't say is their assumption you're so dumb you'd take the full horse dose which is designed for a 1200lb animal, instead of correctly taking only 1/6th of the dose which is what would be safe for a 200lb man. It is this sort of slipperiness that all of their concerns about veterinary ivermectin rely upon. If you buy the correct veterinary versions and know how to calculate correct human dosages, the veterinary stuff is the same as the stuff you'd get with a human prescription. So why would you need the veterinary stuff? Because a lot of pressure is being applied on doctors right now NOT to write prescriptions for ivermectin for human patients.

ive got a good doc

[seanb1979]

Experts agree that only approved methods should be utilized in the fight against Covid.

And the approved methods are the most profitable methods

[tunejunkie]

So folks won't take the vaccine bc "not approved" but will take ivermectin even though "not approved"?

Ivermectin has been around for over 40 years. It’s safe af.


Tell me. How long has the vaccine been around? Oh that’s right.

[jamesfrancis1]

The age something has been around is the basis of useful something is vs a disease? Might as well chug take opiods that have been around for thousands of years. You’re promoting dog heart worm medication to treat covid you dumb fuking ****.

[seanb1979]

The age something has been around is the basis of useful something is vs a disease? Might as well chug take opiods that have been around for thousands of years. You’re promoting dog heart worm medication to treat covid you dumb fuking ****.

You stupid ****, it's been used 4 billion times in humans. It's been proven effective vs covid over and over again. It helped mexico and india in particular.

[jamesfrancis1]

You stupid ****, it's been used 4 billion times in humans. It's been proven effective vs covid over and over again. It helped mexico and india in particular.

No it didn’t. If it was all the dumb rednecks taking it wouldn’t be ending up on the icu like they are now. You’re just so god dsmn stupid it’s amazing.

[tunejunkie]

The age something has been around is the basis of useful something is vs a disease? Might as well chug take opiods that have been around for thousands of years. You’re promoting dog heart worm medication to treat covid you dumb fuking ****.

This is an example of the OP. Pro-covid people like you have no real argument.

[tunejunkie]

No it didn’t. If it was all the dumb rednecks taking it wouldn’t be ending up on the icu like they are now. You’re just so god dsmn stupid it’s amazing.

Lmao you have no idea what you’re talking about the studies are already out on India. It helped. It’s funny that you have such strong feelings about a topic you know nothing about

[jamesfrancis1]

Lmao you have no idea what you’re talking about the studies are already out on India. It helped. It’s funny that you have such strong feelings about a topic you know nothing about

Reality says otherwise. You are killing people spreading your bullchit. Scumbag

[tunejunkie]

Reality says otherwise. You are killing people spreading your bullchit. Scumbag

More empty arguments with no substance. You’re proving my OP right with every post you make loll

[210G]

All of the studies on ivermectin for the treatment of covid-19 are low-quality or have huge flaws. Even Merck has spoken against using Ivermectin for covid-19 https://www.merck.com/news/merck-sta...d-19-pandemic/ and they would MAKE money from it being approved for covid19.

[elterrible987]

Its because Drumpf hyped it up and libtards would rather people die than Drumpf be right. These libtards also claim the covid response and covid policies are not political but "science". yeah ok executive orders by elective officials and questioning the effectiveness of those policies has nothing to do with the political process. Libtards are programmed sheep and dont realize it.

[tunejunkie]

All of the studies on ivermectin for the treatment of covid-19 are low-quality or have huge flaws. Even Merck has spoken against using Ivermectin for covid-19 https://www.merck.com/news/merck-sta...d-19-pandemic/ and they would MAKE money from it being approved for covid19.

False. Merck wouldn’t make money off of it. The patent is expired. That’s the most over glaring part of it.

And if you listen to the rogan podcast with the front line lung ICU specialist who is seeing the good results with ivermectin he points out that merk is chitting on ivermectin but at the same time partnered up with a company to make their own new pill that will have a patent, in which he will make money that way.



Also addressed is the “studies are weak” argument. There are tons of these studies and being “weak” is the only argument. No one can say they have proof it doesn’t work.

[jamesfrancis1]

False. Merck wouldn’t make money off of it. The patent is expired. That’s the most over glaring part of it.

And if you listen to the rogan podcast with the front line lung ICU specialist who is seeing the good results with ivermectin he points out that merk is chitting on ivermectin but at the same time partnered up with a company to make their own new pill that will have a patent, in which he will make money that way.



Also addressed is the “studies are weak” argument. There are tons of these studies and being “weak” is the only argument. No one can say they have proof it doesn’t work.

Your entire basis for spreading bull hit is some podcast you listen to. It makes you confident enough to go around spreading a bullxhit cure that is causing people to call poison control because they’re taking dog heart worm medication. You have enough confidence in your podcast beliefs that you don’t care if they will inadvertently kill people? Stop being a pos.

[210G]

False. Merck wouldn’t make money off of it. The patent is expired. That’s the most over glaring part of it.

And if you listen to the rogan podcast with the front line lung ICU specialist who is seeing the good results with ivermectin he points out that merk is chitting on ivermectin but at the same time partnered up with a company to make their own new pill that will have a patent, in which he will make money that way.



Also addressed is the “studies are weak” argument. There are tons of these studies and being “weak” is the only argument. No one can say they have proof it doesn’t work.

The patent doesn't matter when selling the brand name drug. I like that your source is Joe Rogan.

All of the evidence shows no efficacy unless you count flawed studies.

[CrimsonSteel]

They've been brainwashed to blindly accept everything the news tells them. I see people on social media spitting pure vitriol about "Anti-vaxxers." Overhear my own family and friends laughing about 'Anti-vaxxers' "Begging for masks" after being hospitalized...even though that news story turned out to be as true as that ****git rapper from that show getting attacked with a noose in Chicago.

People have lost the ability to come to their own conclusions, or are blissfully ignorant to avoid the embarrassing truth they were tricked into getting an experimental shot called JAB to their faces like cattle.

[tunejunkie]

Your entire basis for spreading bull hit is some podcast you listen to. It makes you confident enough to go around spreading a bullxhit cure that is causing people to call poison control because they’re taking dog heart worm medication. You have enough confidence in your podcast beliefs that you don’t care if they will inadvertently kill people? Stop being a pos.

Lmao another post proving my point hahahahah. Calling it dog heart worm med hahahahahahah man literally every post you make proves my point. You can’t make this up

[210G]

The reason "nothing" works is because under the emergency use authorization terms that the vaccine is being distributed, if another solution is found that treats the disease, vaccines cannot be distributed under the EUA, which means loss of money for pharma.

See the the fourth bullet point below for reference:

https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download

So when pfizer is approved on Monday what will your argument be?

[tunejunkie]

The patent doesn't matter when selling the brand name drug. I like that your source is Joe Rogan.

All of the evidence shows no efficacy unless you count flawed studies.

Can you show me where I said joe rogan said this? Show me the post where I said that. Go on. I’ll wait.


Actually the patent does matter. Literally anyone can make the drug. It’s a generic drug at this point and is only a couple dollars.


Lmao. Add you to the list.


Also again the studies. They have over 70 have all shown great success. Your only argument is that they’re weak. Sorry man.

Pro-covid people like you are mind boggling

[5x10]

The patent doesn't matter when selling the brand name drug. I like that your source is Joe Rogan.

All of the evidence shows no efficacy unless you count flawed studies.

What’s the flaw with the following study?

https://www.cureus.com/articles/6480...thcare-workers


Also, if there is suggested reduction of risk by taking it, and there’s little to no side effects, why not try it?
Hell, stack it on the vax, doesn’t have to one or the other

I took my first dose yesterday
Only side effects were a few hot farts, I was sure they were going to be putrid smelling, strangely, they weren’t