Which one is better? I perfer the Standing Military Press.
Could i use em i the same work out? or is it just doing the same exercise?
Please Inlighten me.
|
-
03-10-2007, 06:28 AM #1
-
03-10-2007, 06:46 AM #2
i assume your talking about seated dumbell shoulder press so
the standing mil itary press is more of a power move and a explosive movement , great if your a football player or something
and it can have great effects for bodybuilding
where as the seated press is more of an isolation because your seated so you cant use your own momentum to push the weight up its strictly the shouldersIn Hoots We Trust.
-
03-10-2007, 06:52 AM #3
-
03-10-2007, 07:09 AM #4
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 35,529
- Rep Power: 394599
I prefer seated shoulder press. It seems like I can isolate my shoulders more with this movement allowing me to develope better shoulder developement. They are bascially the same movement it is just the standing military presses allow for more synergistic and stabilizer muscles to get involved. You can try doing behind the neck barbell presses if you like doing presses movements.
-
-
03-10-2007, 07:17 AM #5
-
03-10-2007, 01:51 PM #6
-
03-10-2007, 02:03 PM #7
the form of the exersice doesnt dictate the kind of exersice being done
military press can be done either seated or standing with dumbells or a barbell
if your doing it standing that is formore power and explosiveness because you use your whole body
where as if your seated its more isolationIn Hoots We Trust.
-
03-10-2007, 02:12 PM #8
-
-
03-10-2007, 02:50 PM #9
Ah, I get ya now- sorry man, you described it differently to others on the forum, is all (generally described as standing being for core/overall strength, seated for isolation/building mass).
Having said that, the power/explosiveness would be more enhanced by push presses, hence my query in the first place! Thanks for your speedy response!
-
03-10-2007, 02:52 PM #10
Bookmarks