Roe v. Wade

[ohiostate124]

In light of recent events, let us not forget that Roe v. Wade was passed because of a lie. And now look where we are.........

[Ephedra]

Everything liberals do is based on a lie...propagated by the media.

[SconeBulker]

The Dissenting opinions were legally sound. The others? Not so much.

[Fishman15]

In light of recent events, let us not forget that Roe v. Wade was passed because of a lie. And now look where we are.........

Interesting...I did not know that. Now that I do know that...I'm not surprised with that.

[A-GAME]

Everything liberals do is based on a lie...propagated by the media.

tHIS.

[backinbusiness]

I just don’t see the problem with letting the states decide.

Either way it won’t be overturned as much as Libs want to push the narrative. Most Americans don’t have a problem with abortion - they have a problem with unrestricted abortion.

Most Americans don’t have an issue with an abortion a few weeks in. Leftist nutcases want to allow abortion in the 3rd trimester - that’s not even law in the EU that they praise as a liberal bastion

[ack33]

Liberals in 2018
>We cannot separate mothers from their children

Liberals 6 months later
>Mothers should be able to kill their child after giving birth

[sandaltan]

Liberals in 2018
>We cannot separate mothers from their children

Liberals 6 months later
>Mothers should be able to kill their child after giving birth

lol wot

[KyleAaron]

It's kind of odd that a bunch of guys who are into casual sex are against abortion. This forum is always very strange.

[sandaltan]

It's kind of odd that a bunch of guys who are into casual sex are against abortion. This forum is always very strange.

they think its the woman's job to bear their children if they impregnate them

[NKWulf]

lol wot

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sas...rtion-comments

[sawoobley]

Objective achieved. Must kill developing babies.

[thunderykoala]

they think its the woman's job to bear their children if they impregnate them

Or it's simply not wanting to condone what one believes to be murder, even if you disagrees with that notion (which I understand). Just because I might dislike something or think it's a burden doesn't mean I should be legally permitted to chop its head off and eat it.

[sandaltan]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sas...rtion-comments

where the hell did he say he wanted to kill babies after birth. did you read the comment and the article?

[sandaltan]

Objective achieved. Must kill developing babies.

i mean to be fair, those are called fetuses

[NKWulf]

where the hell did he say he wanted to kill babies after birth. did you read the comment and the article?

“So in this particular example if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

this is what he is talking about.

[sandaltan]

Or it's simply not wanting to condone what one believes to be murder, even if you disagrees with that notion (which I understand). Just because I might dislike something or think it's a burden doesn't mean I should be legally permitted to chop its head off and eat it.

fine then dont condone it, but yiou shouldnt be legally permitted to prevent others who feel differently. at most, you can complain about it

[Steemboat]

It's kind of odd that a bunch of guys who are into casual sex are against abortion. This forum is always very strange.

They're definitely not against the idea of it, but rather the people who are supporting it.

[HoganIsGOAT]

I'm pro choice with conditions. I may not love it, but in cases of rape, incest, mother's health at risk, minor pregnancy and just plain welfare queens who pop out babies they can't afford, it could be the best option sometimes.

At a certain point (probably the 1st trimester), it may be your body but I don't think you should be allowed to kill a person growing inside of you, if it's illegal to kill a person outside of you.

[sandaltan]

this is what he is talking about.

maybe im misunderstanding but i still dont see where the baby is killed after being born.

in any event, i dont think that bill would get much support if its post-birth abortion. current laws are based on viability, which i agree with

[ack33]

maybe im misunderstanding but i still dont see where the baby is killed after being born.

> the infant would be delivered
> The infant would be kept comfortable
> The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired

[thunderykoala]

fine then dont condone it, but yiou shouldnt be legally permitted to prevent others who feel differently. at most, you can complain about it

Well, that brings me back to the pro-life perspective of murder. What you're basically expressing to pro-lifers is that they don't have to condone murder, but they shouldn't be legally permitted to prevent others who enjoy genocide. You don't have to agree with that notion, but that's basically how it is for them.

[NKWulf]

maybe im misunderstanding but i still dont see where the baby is killed after being born.

in any event, i dont think that bill would get much support if its post-birth abortion. current laws are based on viability, which i agree with

maybe its Tran's comment

Northam’s comments were made during an appearance on a local radio station to discuss The Repeal Act, which seeks to repeal restrictions on third-trimester abortions.

Virginia Democratic Del. Kathy Tran, a sponsor, sparked outrage from conservatives when she was asked at a hearing if a woman about to give birth and dilating could still request an abortion. The bill was tabled in committee this week.

“My bill would allow that, yes,” she said. Existing state law does not put an absolute time limit on abortions and Tran's legislation does not alter that, but it does loosen restrictions on the need to get additional certification from doctors.

but this is where he is getting is comment about libs killing babies.

[Ephedra]

maybe im misunderstanding but i still dont see where the baby is killed after being born.

in any event, i dont think that bill would get much support if its post-birth abortion. current laws are based on viability, which i agree with

I don't blame you for missing this...the media has been ignoring it all day.

[CalmWind]

Since when is "my body, my rights" a valid argument....


Basic science says that a Woman shares her body with a growing baby. This is how all mammals procreate. The mother gets pregnant and becomes a host for her baby.


Once a woman becomes pregnant, the "my body, my right" thing goes out the window. You have to face reality. The truth.

And the truth is, in our reality, women share their body with another human being. It's not just your body anymore.

[ack33]

they think its the woman's job to bear their children if they impregnate them

Imagine if you flipped the gender on that statement. Is it the man's job to provide for the child and mother just because he got her pregnant?

Obviously yes because that's called responsibility and being a responsible adult. The only women celebrating abortion are ones who just don't want the responsibility of being a parent

[Steemboat]

Obviously yes because that's called responsibility and being a responsible adult. The only women celebrating abortion are ones who just don't want the responsibility of being a parent

I agree with your first point, but do you really want these women being responsible for the well being of children then?

[thunderykoala]

Imagine if you flipped the gender on that statement. Is it the man's job to provide for the child and mother just because he got her pregnant?

His opinion is sort of that a father can kill the mother because she's being a parasitic burden to the man. The father in that scenario would be bearing the burden of the mother and child at that point, and therefore is entitled to offing the mother.

[sandaltan]

maybe its Tran's comment



but this is where he is getting is comment about libs killing babies.

yeah...the keyword = ABOUT to give birth, not AFTER giving birth. i mean, thats a pretty critical distinction, isnt it? everyone talking about how this means after birth, when really its before?

so hes literally not advocating for post-birth abortion.

jesus you people and your fake news i swear to god. why lie about it? why try to make it seem like hes promoting post-birth abortions when he's not?

[ack33]

yeah...the keyword = about to give birth, not AFTER giving birth. i mean, thats a pretty critical distinction, isnt it? everyone talking about how this means after birth, when really its before?

LOL do you even know how birth works? I wonder now if you've even had sex with a woman

If a woman wants an abortion the moment before she's about to give birth, they can't tell her, "okay we'll just keep the baby in there and send you to Planned Parenthood this month". It's a fully formed human being at that point and it's going to come out whether she wants it to or not. They would do what he said in the original quote which I referenced to you but will reference again


> the infant would be delivered (birthed)
> The infant would be kept comfortable (living and breathing)
> The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired (deciding to murder it)