Fascist Germany was not interested in taking Poland, only taking back the German areas that were given to Poland at the end of WW1. Had Poland given back these areas to Germany and made an effort to be friendly and atleast civilized, then Germany would have never invaded and the Soviets probably would not have invaded either. Poland was literally invaded and conquered because of England and France encouraging it not to have peace with Germany.
|
View Poll Results: Coyote versus German Shepherd
- Voters
- 15. You may not vote on this poll
-
07-06-2016, 09:19 PM #121
-
07-06-2016, 09:19 PM #122
-
07-06-2016, 09:20 PM #123
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 14,646
- Rep Power: 68005
Poland still exist though right? I don't know why people think wars are these clean cut excersises where the winners get everything they wanted. Stalin was heavily involved in the war against Germany at that point and dividing up part of Poland was highly favorable than risking all out war with the USSR. We knew we could beat Germany within reasonable expectations, the outlook for the cost to beat the USSR was bleak to say the least, and if it had come to that I doubt half the European countries in existence today would exist.
Not to mention after the war with Germany was done, all the allies were then launching war on Japan, the USSR wasn't someone anyone wanted to go to war with at that time. Stalin knew this, which is why when Germany was on the brink of collapse he began demanding the piece of Poland which Germany had offered them.
I 100% don't believe that, not to mention they still declared war and invaded Poland knowing full well the pacts Poland had with Britain and France. Don't know how you can speak on what Germany would have done or not done if the allies had simply done nothing and let Nazi Germany have their way. I am sure Stalin was pretty confident in what Germany would do/not do as well.
'Belief without evidence is a fools game.
Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
-
07-06-2016, 09:20 PM #124
-
-
07-06-2016, 09:20 PM #125
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Location: Calcutta, West Bengal, India
- Posts: 1,560
- Rep Power: 3192
I don't "think" they wanted to, it is a fact. Read about the remilitarization of the Rhineland in 1936. That was the beginning. Hitler didn't want to "take over France". He wanted the northern areas that he occupied because in his eyes they belonged to the German people. And Belgium (along with the Netherlands) was allegedly land on the Western front for the Germanic peoples too.
Britain was concerned about THAT particular geo-strategic importance of those plans because they could be used as a springboard to invade the British Isles. Again, they didn't actually care much about France, and they absolutely didn't give a fuark about Poland - except to use it as a pre-text to try and halt Germany's expansion.#1 Indian chad on the misc right now
-
07-06-2016, 09:27 PM #126
- Join Date: Sep 2003
- Location: Mississippi, United States
- Posts: 34,911
- Rep Power: 369595
Germany invading poland started ww2 officially. then the luftwaffe branched out from there and started making europe their bitch. It took the help fo the red army and and the british giving up their bases abroad to us americans to stop them
“That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die.” - The Nameless City by HP Lovecraft
"The higher the prevalence of infectious diseases the higher the probability of totalitarian political attitudes."
-Dr. Jordan Peterson Sept 2017
"The search for a moral equivalent of war continues to define American Liberalism to this day."
-
07-06-2016, 09:27 PM #127
-
07-06-2016, 09:28 PM #128
-
-
07-06-2016, 09:29 PM #129
Hitler pretty much directly said that Germany does not need to expand to the west, and that would be a wrong move. Aside from taking back any German land that was lost after WW1, Hitler said that if Germany was to expand, it would have to be in the east at the expense of Russia. Aside that any land France may have had that was formerly German before WW1, there was no plans to conquer France or Belgium or England. Hell Germany could have destroyed England easily but choose not to because they thought England would come to its senses and make peace.
-
07-06-2016, 09:35 PM #130
Thing is, Britain and France knew that Germany would approach Poland to work out the taking back of those German areas. Knowing this they promised Poland they would come to its aid and that they should not give an inch to Germany. They did this to make Germany have to invade so that they could have their war because it was England and France who wanted war, not Germany.
Hitler peacefully got back German lands two or three times at that point already, and there is no reason to believe that he didn't want to also do it peacefully with Poland as well.
-
07-06-2016, 09:41 PM #131
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Location: Calcutta, West Bengal, India
- Posts: 1,560
- Rep Power: 3192
I think you'll find that you're arguing with me for no reason. Britain fuarked up both WWI and WWII with its decisions, thus the reason it went from superpower to cuck status. Niall Ferguson documents this vividly in his works on the death of the Western world and civilisation, beginning in 1918.
What Hitler said, and what Nazi Germany actually did, were often not the same thing.
Germany would not have destroyed Britain easily. Britain actually matched Germany in terms of firepower on land and air, and their naval fleet would have absolutely rekt the Kriegsmarine. Hitler was an army man, a hardened soldier, and didn't give a chit about the navy. The Luftwaffe were hectic - but Britain over estimated them.
If you actually read about Britain's haphazard military decisions, and their hesitance to do what was necessary and what was right - you'll see how badly they consistently fuarked up throughout the war, even at times when they should have rekt the Axis.
It wasn't until their spies cracked Germany's codes, and Germany made the fatal decision of going to war with the USSR, that enabled the Allies (with the help of the US) to win. Germany wasted valuable men and resources on saving Italy and going to war with the USSR. Until then, it was pretty certain that Germany was actually going to win the war.#1 Indian chad on the misc right now
-
07-06-2016, 09:44 PM #132
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 14,646
- Rep Power: 68005
Okay so I will break it down for you.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact:
"The stated clauses of the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact were a guarantee of non-belligerence by each party towards the other, and a written commitment that neither party would ally itself to, or aid, an enemy of the other party. In addition to stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included a secret protocol that divided territories of Romania, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland into German and Soviet "spheres of influence"
'
But ofcourse after Poland everything was going to be chill and no further actions taken.
Plan Z
"Plan Z was the name given to the planned re-equipment and expansion of the Kriegsmarine (German navy) ordered by Adolf Hitler in early 1939. The fleet was meant to challenge the naval power of the United Kingdom, and was to be completed by 1948. Development of the plan began in 1938, but it reflected the evolution of the strategic thinking of the Oberkommando der Marine (Naval High Command) over the two decades following World War I. The plan called for a fleet centered on ten battleships and four aircraft carriers which were intended to battle the Royal Navy. This force would be supplemented with numerous long-range cruisers that would attack British shipping. A relatively small force of U-boats was also stipulated"
Hitler threatening total annihilation m- The Reichstag Speech
Hitler massing weapons and armaments
The German rearmament was an era of rearmament in Germany during the interwar period (1918-1939), in violation of the Treaty of Versailles. It began as soon as the treaty was signed, on a small, secret, and informal basis but it was massively expanded after the Nazi Party came to power in 1933.
Yes, I am sure Czechoslovakia was ecstatic when Germany marched into Prague.Belief without evidence is a fools game.
Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
-
-
07-06-2016, 09:44 PM #133
Hitler could have captured or killed 300,000 English and French troops at Dunkirk but he let them go, against the protests of his generals. Hitler offered England peace many times and an end to the war, even as Germany was curb stomping everyone. Hitler did not want to conquerer any new lands in the west, not even close.
-
07-06-2016, 09:47 PM #134
-
07-06-2016, 09:49 PM #135
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 14,646
- Rep Power: 68005
[QUOTE=SeymourCake;1451491373]You fell for allied/Jew propaganda. You are a good goy.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/GQL
So Hitler wasn't the bad guy? We weren't the good guys?
I legit didn't know people who believed in all the jewish conspiracies existed until I joined the misc.
But naturally I am sure you can prove there is a global jewish conspiracy pulling all the strings of all the Governments, and that Germany was poor lil dindu nuffin and all the allies were jewish agents acting on behalf of their jewish overlords.
I am prob the misinformed sheep right?
Lol.
"Among other things, it entailed the creation of a pan-German racial state structured according to Nazi ideology to ensure the supremacy of an Aryan-Nordic master race, massive territorial expansion into Eastern Europe through its colonization with German settlers, the physical annihilation of the Jews and others considered to be "unworthy of life", and the extermination, expulsion, or enslavement of most of the Slavic peoples and others regarded as "racially inferior".Nazi Germany’s desire for aggressive territorial expansionism was one of the most important causes of World War II."
"Look we want to take all the lands, invade your allies, and some other sketchy chit just let us have our way and everything will be cool bro"
Belief without evidence is a fools game.
Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
-
07-06-2016, 09:53 PM #136
-
-
07-06-2016, 09:55 PM #137
Well you know I can post sources and quotes that proves my arguement and refutes your sources and quotes. You will say that my sources are wrong and I will say the same to you.
So what it comes down to for anyone watching is what version of events make more sense?
"Historians assert that Hitler was determined to invade Poland. However, had this been his intention, he could have instructed the Danzig senate to pass a resolution abolishing League of Nations jurisdiction and returning the city to the Reichs sovereignty. This would have provoked the Polish military response Beck warned of, and Germany could then intervene with her own army in order to defend the Danzig populations right to self-determination. Given the sensitive issue of democratic principles, and the fact that Poland was striking the first blow, it would then have been difficult for Britain to justify support for Poland under the provisions of the guarantee"
"the verdict of General Georg Thomas, chief of the Armed Forces Armaments Staff, Germany went to war with completely insufficient economic preparations.... The enormous economic preparations that would have been necessary for a new world war were practically not even implemented."117
"The American ambassador in Paris, William Bullitt, informed the French government during the summer that if England and France did not come to Polands aid in the event of a German attack, then they could expect no assistance from Washington in a general European war. They could on the other hand, reckon with the full support of the USA if they declared war on Germany on Polands behalf.226 The former French Foreign Minister Georges Bonnet later wrote that Bullitt urged France to take a strong stand against Hitler. I am convinced also that he persuaded Daladier that Roosevelt would intervene (in the war) if he saw that France and England were in danger. . . . Bullitt in 1939 did everything he could to make France enter the war."227 Congressman Fish concluded, If Roosevelt had refrained from meddling in the European situation by encouraging England and France to believe that we would fight their battles, they would have reached an agreement by peaceful means to settle the Danzig issue . . . (and) avoided the disastrous war."228
October 6, 1939, Hitler addressed the Reichstag, asking for a peace conference. Chamberlain himself admitted in his diary that the Fhrer presented some very attractive proposals."232 Roosevelt however, pressured the British not to allow a second Munich.
"In Warsaw, Ribbentrops staff compiled the pre-war diplomatic correspondence between Warsaw and its missions in Washington, London, and Paris. The Vlkischer Beobachter published the content on October 27. Its editor summarized, The Polish documents prove that Roosevelts diplomacy bears a major, if not the greatest measure of responsibility for the outbreak of the English war."238 One letter for example, was from the Polish general staff to Beck. It quoted the American military attach, Commander Gade, as promising Poland 1,000 airplanes as soon as the war begins. The Polish staff officer described Gade as a man who enjoys the confidence of Roosevelt and is a personal friend of his. . . . He is very unfriendly towards Germany. Personally he is very wealthy."239
-
07-06-2016, 09:59 PM #138
-
07-06-2016, 09:59 PM #139
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 14,646
- Rep Power: 68005
[QUOTE=SeymourCake;1451492123] This sounds like a batchit insane anti-jew propaganda piece. I am assuming this is suppose to be some jewish handbook? Is there any proof this is real and not a fabrication?
Not to mention, other than text, there would still have to be people carrying out these insane plans, none of them were every brought to light?
This legit reads like a villians handbook from a disney movie in the most uncreative of fashions. "Take over the world by starting world wars and running countries into the ground to the point they want us to take over"
Aight. Jews must have set up Franz Ferdinand and forced Germanys aggressive land expansion.Belief without evidence is a fools game.
Listen Crew - Anything on your mind, want someone to talk to? Hit that PM button brah
5 * Thread Maker
Lone Star State Crew
Diesel Life Crew
Lol @ Trumplets Crew
Lol @ CEO of Exxon for SoS, GoldmanSachs for Treasury, and Creationist for Education Crew
Lol @ Drain the Swamp Crew
Reps for life: stfaulk89
-
07-06-2016, 10:05 PM #140
-
-
07-06-2016, 10:11 PM #141
It’s worthwhile summarizing the main figures in the Jewish power structure, as of 1912. Herzl died young in 1904, so he was out of the picture. But a “mere handful” of others came to dominate the movement, and the American scene:
Oscar Straus (age 62), German-born, first Jewish cabinet member under T. Roosevelt, and later ambassador to the Ottoman Empire under Taft.
Jacob Schiff (65), head of the Kuhn, Loeb banking firm.
Louis Marshall (56), borderline Zionist, founder of the AJC.
The Warburg brothers: Paul (44) and Felix (41), German-born bankers. A third brother, Max, stayed in Germany (until 1938).
Henry Morgenthau, Sr. (56), German-born lawyer, father of the even more influential Henry, Jr.
Louis Brandeis (56), lawyer, strongly Zionist.
Samuel Untermyer (54), lawyer.
Bernard Baruch (42), Wall Street financier.
Stephen Wise (40), Austrian-born rabbi and fervent Zionist.
Richard Gottheil (50), British-born rabbi and Zionist.
But perhaps the most significant of all was Bernard Baruch. A millionaire before he was 30, Baruch catapulted out of nowhere, under obscure conditions, to become a leading influence in the Wilson administration. Already in 1915, in the early years of the European war, he was convinced that America would be involved. In Congressional testimony of February 1920, Baruch stated that, in 1915, he “had been very much disturbed by the unprepared condition of this country.” “I had been thinking about it very seriously, and I thought we would be drawn into the war. … I thought a war was coming long before it did.” Through some still-mysterious process, Baruch was named to the Council of National Defense in early 1916. He then came to control a particular subcommittee, the War Industries Board (WIB), which had extraordinary wartime powers. Baruch single-handedly ran it throughout the war years. His testimony before Sen. Albert Jefferis (R-Neb.) summarizes his role:
AJ: “In what lines did this board of 10 have the powers that you mention?
BB: “We had the power of priority, which was the greatest power in the war.”
AJ: “In other words, you determined what everybody could have?”
BB: “Exactly; there is no question about that. I assumed that responsibility, sir, and that final determination rested within me.”
AJ: “What?”
BB: “That final determination, as the President said, rested within me; the determination of whether the Army or Navy should have it rested with me; the determination of whether the Railroad Administration could have it, or the Allies, or whether General Allenby should have locomotives, or whether they should be used in Russia, or used in France.”
AJ: “You had considerable power?”
BB: “Indeed I did, sir.” …
AJ: “And all those different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?”
BB: “Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”
Source: War Expenditures: Parts 1 to 13. US Government Printing Office (1921: 1814, 1816).
Winston Churchill, British statesman, and Bernard Baruch, financier, converse in the back seat of a car in front of Baruch's home.
"This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States)... this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the19 th century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." - Winston Churchill writing on 'Zionism versus Bolshevism' in the Illustrated Sunday Herald (February 1920)
Source:
"I am, of course, a Zionist, and have been ever since the Balfour Declaration." - Churchill quoted in The Official Churchill in One Volume, N.Y. Times (Nov. 6, 1991) by Herbert Mitgang
Balfour Declaration: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
As an active Zionist and close friend of Chaim Weizmann, Walter Rothschild worked to formulate the draft declaration for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. On 2 November 1917 he received a letter from the British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, addressed to his London home at 148 Piccadilly. In this letter the British government declared its support for the establishment in Palestine of "a national home for the Jewish people". This letter became known as the Balfour Declaration.
Guess what happened shortly after World War II? That's right, the Jewish State of Israel is established in Palestine after being approved by the UN on May 1948.
Notice the areas that refused to recognize Israel as a legitimate state? Notice how most of the conflict that takes place in current events are occurring in those areas? I wonder who could be behind this?Last edited by SeymourCake; 07-06-2016 at 10:58 PM.
-
07-07-2016, 09:21 PM #142
-
07-07-2016, 09:29 PM #143
-
07-08-2016, 06:32 PM #144
-
-
07-08-2016, 06:33 PM #145
-
07-08-2016, 06:39 PM #146
-
07-08-2016, 06:42 PM #147
-
07-08-2016, 06:48 PM #148
-
-
07-08-2016, 06:48 PM #149
-
07-08-2016, 06:49 PM #150
Bookmarks