but if you hate both of them why not consider the third party candidate instead of forcing yourself to vote for trump/clinton?
disclaimer: I don't know much about politics.
|
Thread: Trump dun goofed
-
10-03-2016, 02:25 AM #61
-
10-03-2016, 02:31 AM #62
-
10-03-2016, 02:31 AM #63
not for ''some odd reason'' but for the reason of globalism vs nationalism.
>hillary = destroy countries and their heritage and make everyone equally poor
>trump = say mean things, has actually great policies (but lets attack him on what mean things he say) and doesnt want to destroy nations
yeah.....
looks like 10 months of negative media starts working, gg easily manipulated people, gg
-
10-03-2016, 02:35 AM #64
-
-
10-03-2016, 03:32 AM #65
-
10-03-2016, 03:34 AM #66
-
10-03-2016, 03:37 AM #67
This puts you into the same lot has hillary and her cucks. You're likely in college, where they pamper you with all the ethical bullchit. I've been with the top people in several companies. Let me tell you something kid (or should i say baby), not a single one of them was 100% legitimate and would fck over people on the reg to get ahead. At one point i even hired my best friend, he tried to get me fired so he could have my position, and i spent a whole year plotting to get him fired and i did. I made more at AMC movie theaters working than any of my co-workers bc i found ways to cheat the system and doubled my pay.
It's all the zombies who try to go by the comfort of the rules made up by fat armchair enthusiasts that remain the cattle for the rest of us to herd. He didn't screw up by what he did, he actually made himself platinum in the eyes of anyone with a brain.
-
10-03-2016, 03:40 AM #68
LOL "great policies" HAHAHAH. He didn't even know the difference between the Kurds and the Quds Force when asked.
the fact that the media is biased against him won't change the fact that he's a complete imbecile.
Hillary is a better candidate by any stretch of the imagination because even tho she keeps up with bullchit about BLM, feminism and SJW nonsense, there is no doubt that she's qualified and knows her chit. The same cannot be said for Trump. He's more of a truck driver than a politician.
Also heres a TRUE conservative reking your daddy lord emporer
not that this will change your opinion. Nothing can change the opinion of Trump fappers.
-
-
10-03-2016, 03:41 AM #69
Agree with this statement but at the same time the Republican Party narrative that the rich pay way too much in taxes is retarded. The rich DO earn there money off the middle class simply because they can spend millions of dollars lobbying for their interests are way over represented. Anyone who is pays their fair share is getting cucked as a result.
Citizens United was the worst SC decision in the last 25 years. Nobody is thrilled about Clinton but I can't vote for someone who thinks nominating someone in the vein of Antonin Scalia is a good idea.
-
10-03-2016, 04:00 AM #70
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 2,492
- Rep Power: 17437
He never says what the actual story is. He definitely rambles off some simple statement, but I wonder what he thinks hes saying in his head. "If" they didn't do a good job, did he terminate their contract? Did he see bad work, issue a cure notice and they still didn't deliver? Just playing devils advocate, but maybe they weren't paid because they didn't perform and he had to terminate their contract and went elsewhere. I don't know the story, but this one line statements he makes sound like he's an idiot. He needs to calmly and intelligently describe what he's trying to say. I'd still take my chances with him over Hillary.
ErgoGenix ErgoZzz log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=167645251&p=1365912691#post1365912691
NEVERSUMMER Snowboard Brah
❄ ❄ ❄ ❄Official Misc Ski/Snowboard Crew❄ ❄ ❄ ❄
Sunkin' Guns Crew
-
10-03-2016, 04:10 AM #71
- Join Date: Jan 2004
- Location: Seoul, South Korea, Korea, Republic of
- Age: 39
- Posts: 3,082
- Rep Power: 2163
Question for you Trump supporters who are still in denial..
Do you support welfare queens who purposely have children so they can get additional welfare? These women are also " gaming the system " too. Is it okay for someone to abuse welfare? After all, they are just doing what they can get away with just like Trump is doing.
-
10-03-2016, 04:11 AM #72
-
-
10-03-2016, 04:46 AM #73
-
10-03-2016, 04:55 AM #74
-
10-03-2016, 05:05 AM #75
-
10-03-2016, 05:10 AM #76
-
-
10-03-2016, 05:44 AM #77
-
10-03-2016, 05:48 AM #78
-
10-03-2016, 08:54 AM #79
Finally someone who understood the original post, I wasn't even referring to taxes.
traditionally defined as a personality disorder[1] characterized by persistent antisocial behavior, impaired empathy and remorse, and bold, disinhibited, egotistical traits.
So I don't think he's anti-social, so I may be categorically incorrect.𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖈𝕶, 𝖓𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖇𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍
-
10-03-2016, 09:00 AM #80
-
-
10-03-2016, 09:32 AM #81
I can't help but laugh at this being an issue. People are more mad at a guy for utilizing the tax laws in place to pay as little in taxes as he can (which every one of us would do too), so to illustrate how mad they are about this they're going to elect a career politician who has done nothing to change these laws and who has likely taken advantage of them herself.
brb being mad at someone for following a rule I think is a terrible rule, but supporting a person who has had a part in establishing/maintaining that rule.Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
10-03-2016, 09:35 AM #82
-
10-03-2016, 09:37 AM #83
-
10-03-2016, 09:54 AM #84
-
-
10-03-2016, 09:59 AM #85
-
10-03-2016, 10:00 AM #86
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Location: Plano, Texas, United States
- Posts: 6,210
- Rep Power: 92557
I have zero issue with Trump and his accountants using any and all "loop holes" to minimize tax burden. He'd be foolish if he didn't. But when, on the national debate stage, he interrupted Clinton with a "that makes me smart" and multiple interruptions of "wwrroonngg" it shows that he cannot control himself, cannot stop with emotional outbursts, and shows that he's mentally unstable. For me this is the issue. If he cannot control his outbursts in a debate, if he cannot control his emotions when he feels slighted, how can he be a good president? It sucks because Clinton herself will be a terrible president. But at this point I see Trump as being too emotionally unstable for the job.
-
10-03-2016, 10:03 AM #87
-
10-03-2016, 10:06 AM #88
Hillary needed Trump like oxygen. Had she ran against a Rubio or Rand Paul, she would have been obliterated in the debates. Trump is the ONLY candidate that was projected to lose against Hillary. Think about that for a minute... And the Republi****s decided to nominate the one guy who would give Hillary the election because he talked about some imaginary wall, magically stopping people based on their faith, and racketeering allies. She didn't have absolutely any advantage in facing anyone else except him because nobody is more bat**** crazy than her...except the orange man.
She wouldn't have nothing to hit others with while with Trump she has a entire arsenal of material to use against him, the taxes being just the surface. Lol @ Republican party. They literally elected corrupt Hillary, nobody else.
-
-
10-03-2016, 10:06 AM #89
-
10-03-2016, 10:08 AM #90
Bookmarks