King tut DNA test, dude was white srs

[CommonPheasant]

This explains nothing, name one invention you use every day that wasn't invented by whites.

The wheel and agriculture.

[Boyekta]

No, I never did. You're just making **** up, won't actually quote the bird who said such things, and won't link anything yet maintaining this idea that I've claimed to be black (even told the bird the UT is a rip off of YIAMSOMEBODY, just lol at you).

I knew you were stupid from this thread, but I didn't know how retarded you actually were. Strong supposed high IQ master race you turned out to be, lol.

When did I claim to be high iq in this convo ? Youre also making things up and making personal insults urine idiot
I dont care enough to go search it subhuman

[norsebro]

Intelligence is about 80% inherited.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

No matter of 'culture and nutrition' can make someone born with 90 IQ into a physics professor.

[KingSWRV]

due to genetics, you cant fail an iq test.

How are you making such assumtions ? Study links ?

What if they get the same education ?

There was no such study done. Im basing that off the general consensus/conclusions by legitimate modern scientists that IQ is not tied to race but rather environment.

In addition here are 20 reasons why your people have higher IQs on average, and all of them are cultural/environmental rather than genetic.

http://immortallife.info/articles/en...i-jews-so-high

[norsebro]

The wheel and agriculture.

Africans did not have the wheel when whites arrived.

The Indo-European people living 7000 years ago had the wheel, they had chariots they used to conquer the world.

Agrictulture came from around 8000bc and was discovered by white people too in Anatolia and the fertile crescent, their DNA is present in all Europeans, most strongly in Southern Europeans, but present in ALL Europeans.

[ChiefRocka]

IQ isnt based on your education. you cant convince anyone of that dogshyt you are pushing. american blacks only have SLIGHTLY higher IQ from breeding differences between their africanized cousins.

IQ is certainly based on educational influence. Of course the person that doesn't use his brain in enough intellectual capacity is going to have a lower IQ. This is not a birthright of genetics. The person exposed to more knowledge and intellectual challenges will have a higher IQ than the person that doesn't. Simple. The brain is a muscle and sponge and stimulation will increase it's function. Many underpriveledged African Americans are going to lack in IQ due to this.

Of course, a person can be exposed to knowledge and education yet that doesn't mean they automatically have a high IQ. Genetics can play some role in the level of mental astuteness, sure. Fredo and Michael Corleone came from the same parents.

[liftasaurus]

Yeah if you took 1000 children and they all lived together without education and then at the end of their life you gave them a math and reading IQ test they would all fail equally.

White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of environmental variations. but at least five studies that have attempted to equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant change in relative results. As environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the White. The gap is not decreased. (26) In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites INCREASES where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to the middle classes. (18)

In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school children in Virginia, divided them into 5 racial categories, and tested them for mental aptitude. On average. full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Whites. Three-quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites. One-half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Whites. One-quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites. All of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves “Negroes.” Their environments and “advantages” or disadvantages were exactly the same. (14) Also see (26) pg 452.

Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be “inferior to the Whites on all types of tests used in the Army.” Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that “the lighter groups made better scores.” (14)

Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that over-all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1. (41)

Even when Blacks and Whites have the same backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points lower than comparable Whites. This includes cases where Black children have been adopted by White parents. Their I.Q.s may be improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents than their adoptive parents. (3) (15) (26)

American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than American Blacks during their entire lives, still consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests. (3) (27)

[Boyekta]

White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of environmental variations. but at least five studies that have attempted to equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant change in relative results. As environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the White. The gap is not decreased. (26) In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites INCREASES where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to the middle classes. (18)

In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school children in Virginia, divided them into 5 racial categories, and tested them for mental aptitude. On average. full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Whites. Three-quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites. One-half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Whites. One-quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites. All of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves “Negroes.” Their environments and “advantages” or disadvantages were exactly the same. (14) Also see (26) pg 452.

Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be “inferior to the Whites on all types of tests used in the Army.” Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that “the lighter groups made better scores.” (14)

Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that over-all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1. (41)

Even when Blacks and Whites have the same backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points lower than comparable Whites. This includes cases where Black children have been adopted by White parents. Their I.Q.s may be improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents than their adoptive parents. (3) (15) (26)

American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than American Blacks during their entire lives, still consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests. (3) (27)

Facts are wrong !!!!

[Nattyliftinglol]

can I have some cliffs on this thread?

[norsebro]

can I have some cliffs on this thread?

White bros lay down the facts, that genetics matter, minorities butthurt, mob violence at eight.

[KingSWRV]

IQ is certainly based on educational influence. Of course the person that doesn't use his brain in enough intellectual capacity is going to have a lower IQ. This is not a birthright of genetics. The person exposed to more knowledge and intellectual challenges will have a higher IQ than the person that doesn't. Simple. The brain is a muscle and sponge and stimulation will increase it's function. Many underpriveledged African Americans are going to lack in IQ due to this.

Of course, a person can be exposed to knowledge and education yet that doesn't mean they automatically have a high IQ. Genetics can play some role in the level of mental astuteness, sure. Fredo and Michael Corleone came from the same parents.

The main factor of mental astuteness comes from testosterone, not race.

So an Asian person with high test isn't that good at math as the average Asian.

Or an African with low test is smarter than the average rowdy black person.

There are varying averages of testosterone in different races but this is different than saying mental astuteness is limited by or dictated by race.

Testosterone = IQ
Race = Testosterone
Race =/= IQ

The reason so many people get confused is because their patterns of averages kinda overlap, but there is a significant difference.

White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of environmental variations. but at least five studies that have attempted to equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant change in relative results. As environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the White. The gap is not decreased. (26) In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites INCREASES where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to the middle classes. (18)

In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school children in Virginia, divided them into 5 racial categories, and tested them for mental aptitude. On average. full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Whites. Three-quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites. One-half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Whites. One-quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites. All of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves “Negroes.” Their environments and “advantages” or disadvantages were exactly the same. (14) Also see (26) pg 452.

Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be “inferior to the Whites on all types of tests used in the Army.” Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that “the lighter groups made better scores.” (14)

Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that over-all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1. (41)

Even when Blacks and Whites have the same backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points lower than comparable Whites. This includes cases where Black children have been adopted by White parents. Their I.Q.s may be improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents than their adoptive parents. (3) (15) (26)

American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than American Blacks during their entire lives, still consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests. (3) (27)

Not sure about that bogus source but the science (or lack of it) is still the same.

All of those are due to higher test and environment.

1000 school children: Darker skin blacks tend to have higher test than lighter skin. Its also an environmental modifier.

African Americans were bred to have high test so of course they have higher test than native Indians etc...

They think they are isolating race but they are just isolating test.

[liftasaurus]

Not sure about that bogus source but the science (or lack of it) is still the same.

All of those are due to higher test and environment.

1000 school children: Darker skin blacks tend to have higher test than lighter skin. Its also an environmental modifier.

African Americans were bred to have high test so of course they have higher test than native Indians.

They think they are isolating race but they are just isolating test.

I think you'll find the results are the same with native africans living in cities.

[Mr.PissShivers]

[dakensta]

The main factor of mental astuteness comes from testosterone, not race.

So an Asian person with high test isn't that good at math as the average Asian.

Or an African with low test is smarter than the average rowdy black person.

There are varying averages of testosterone in different races but this is different than saying mental astuteness is limited by or dictated by race.

Testosterone = IQ
Race = Testosterone
Race =/= IQ

The reason so many people get confused is because their patterns of averages kinda overlap, but there is a significant difference.



Not sure about that bogus source but the science (or lack of it) is still the same.

All of those are due to higher test and environment.

1000 school children: Darker skin blacks tend to have higher test than lighter skin. Its also an environmental modifier.

African Americans were bred to have high test so of course they have higher test than native Indians etc...

They think they are isolating race but they are just isolating test.

I'm guessing this guy ^ has yuuuge amounts of testosterone, and an albedo of near zero.

[MrFrumble]

if you took a thousand swedes, and a thousand africans, and placed them on different islands, in the same climate, with the same resources, etc, wonder which island would develop government/order/security/safety first...

wonder which island most people would choose to be dropped on

but, Muh Tabula Rasa!

[KingSWRV]

I think you'll find the results are the same with native africans living in cities.

Africans from which part of Africa?

They vary wildly in levels of test and in culture.

There are Igbos from Nigeria have mad PHDs and make Asian students seem like underachievers...

[liftasaurus]

Africans from which part of Africa?

They vary wildly in levels of test and in culture.

There are Igbos from Nigeria have mad PHDs and make Asian students seem like underachievers...

They vary widely due to the amount of inter-breeding with whites over a long time period. If you want a perfect example of an isolated people then the Australian aborigine is it. There is no such thing as an intelligent Australian aborigine, even when they live in society in the 'right' environment.

[KingSWRV]

if you took a thousand swedes, and a thousand africans, and placed them on different islands, in the same climate, with the same resources, etc, wonder which island would develop government/order/security/safety first...

wonder which island most people would choose to be dropped on

but, Muh Tabula Rasa!

Are they all babies and reset their cultural heritage with no education?

it would take 1000s of years for them to catch back up to us, especially if that island doesn't have everything it takes for farming and expansion like a full continent does...

If they are just 1000 adults from present day than it would be the swedes because they are a more advanced culture due to their origin of development in Europe and the fertile crest for thousands of years of advantage due to geography.

[Boyekta]

Are they all babies and reset their cultural heritage with no education?

it would take 1000s of years for them to catch back up to us, especially if that island doesn't have everything it takes for farming and expansion like a full continent does...

If they are just 1000 adults from present day than it would be the swedes because they are a more advanced culture due to their origin of development in Europe and the fertile crest for thousands of years of advantage due to geography.

Publish your research phdbrah

[pinwheels]

So they deleted the thread about black women having the tightest coochies but let this stay up. Hmmmm.....

[AngryManlet]

can I have some cliffs on this thread?

[BaconBackBrah]

St0rmfronters are basically like Black Lives Matter, using the buzzword 'political correctness' in place of 'racism' when someone has a conflicting opinion. Apparently not being an irrational bigot with no concept of biology outside of emotional bias = political correctness and liberal thinking.

truth!

[joshewwah]

dafuq, this thread is now about IQ?

[Garados]

the most retarded person in the thread has to be the guy saying the higher your testosterone the lower your IQ. of course this ******* is also spamming some pseudo-intellectual circlejerk Reddit literature in "guns, germs and steels" which was written by a LITERAL cuck.

while a lot of people are trolling or just butthurt, this ******* actually believes that **** parroting it on every....single....page of the thread. lmao.

so if someone injects themselves with Test E they immediately become dumber. Lol.

[JimmyRustle1]

I just went onto ancestry.com and King Tut was on my family tree brahs. Im gonna make it.

[thorpowers]

Are they all babies and reset their cultural heritage with no education?

it would take 1000s of years for them to catch back up to us, especially if that island doesn't have everything it takes for farming and expansion like a full continent does...

If they are just 1000 adults from present day than it would be the swedes because they are a more advanced culture due to their origin of development in Europe and the fertile crest for thousands of years of advantage due to geography.

You are very misguided. To throw out the genetic differences between the races is to completely reject evolution theory. Europeans and Africans were isolated for 50,000 years, do you really believe the only thing that would adapt to the different environments is our skin color? The different breeds of dogs have a shorter period of natural selection than that, and the bordier collie is much more intelligent then say a shih tzu. Black people around the world, no matter the culture, from Brazil to the USA to the Congo routinely under perform compared to Europeans. There is a reason Rome 2000 years ago was more advanced than Africa today. There is a reason the Europeans so easily conquered the native Africans. This may be a taboo subject, but science can not be racist. Facts don't care about your feelings. The truth matters.

[KingSWRV]

You are very misguided. To throw out the genetic differences between the races is to completely reject evolution theory. Europeans and Africans were isolated for 50,000 years, do you really believe the only thing that would adapt to the different environments is our skin color? The different breeds of dogs have a shorter period of natural selection than that, and the bordier collie is much more intelligent then say a shih tzu. Black people around the world, no matter the culture, from Brazil to the USA to the Congo routinely under perform compared to Europeans. There is a reason Rome 2000 years ago was more advanced than Africa today. There is a reason the Europeans so easily conquered the native Africans. This may be a taboo subject, but science can not be racist. Facts don't care about your feelings. The truth matters.

Yeah that reason is because of the fertile crest.

---

These are both border collies:






As an analogy to dogs, we would be the great apes. If homo sapiens is an analogy for the border collie the shih tzu would already be extinct.

Homo Sapiens were so superior we killed off all our competition including all the other transitional sub species that have ever existed amongst us.

The Homo Sapiens alive today all come from the same few ancestors and science shows there was a huge bottleneck where 90% of all other homo sub species went extinct and only we homo sapiens are left.

It seems like we have a lot of variety between us now but we actually don't. Over the last few hundred thousand years there was 10 times as many more various sub species of homos roaming the various parts of the earth. Then Homo Sapiens took over everything expanding rapidly and violently and there was a great cleansing.

There is more genetic variation between some Europeans in Europe amongst each other, than there is between some blacks and some whites. In other words there are some black and white people who look more like each other than some white vs white people who are super different from each other.

The genetic differences between us homo sapiens aren't so great as to be able to say a certain race has less capacity than another. We are all the same race, the human race.

The only differences between us were adaptations to geography. Those adaptations didn't fundamentally change us THAT much to be able to say some ethnic groups are potentially smarter/dumber on a genetically limited level because we literally all have the same genetics for homo sapien we got from Mitochondrial Eve 200k years ago as genome studies clearly show without a shadow of a doubt.

[VocelLoser]

The different breeds of dogs have a shorter period of natural selection than that, and the bordier collie is much more intelligent then say a shih tzu.

Different 'breeds' of dogs are only recognized by the American Kennel Club and are nothing short of humans selective breeding for specific traits in a dog's appearance, typically via incest. I don't know why racists like you LOVE that analogy, since it's completely wrong and just shows your lack of understanding of biology, evolution, and canine genetics.

All dogs can breed among themselves perfectly fine, none are hybrids. A horse and a mule are different subspecies from each other, a border collie and a shepherd are the same exact species. Most of these breeds only appeared about 100 years ago, so to think that there would be THAT much genetic variation that appeared NATURALLY (ie not dependent on human intervention) is laughable as fuk.

Different breeds of dog aren't 'smarter' than other breeds, either. They're pretty much all the same intelligence, it's their behaviour that matters when training them. Some dogs naturally have a higher curiosity and need for human approval than other dogs, even within the same breed (German Shepherds can either be extremely lazy or extremely attentive, same with Border Collies). Another thing is environment.. who buys shih-tzus? Typically dumb women who only enter them into dog shows, and not people who train things like flyball, schutzhund, and tracking. It's not like a shih-tzu can't be taught tricks, it's the people who buy them that treat them like a cat.

[didact117]

Africans did not have the wheel when whites arrived.

The Indo-European people living 7000 years ago had the wheel, they had chariots they used to conquer the world.

Agrictulture came from around 8000bc and was discovered by white people too in Anatolia and the fertile crescent, their DNA is present in all Europeans, most strongly in Southern Europeans, but present in ALL Europeans.

a)North africa did. But i assume you specifically mean sub saharan africa. Yes the wheel was barely used in sub sahara africa and too many cultures there it was an alien concept. But to say there wasnt a single wheel to be found is flat out wrong.

Rare yes but not non existent.



You should also realise that human invent things out of necessity. Sub saharan africa has a harsh environment. Deserts, jungles, savannah and rocky mountains. Wheels need flat surfaces to function. You think africans would think bout inventing wheels in such environments? Nah they would stick to other options.

Environment is one of the biggest factors in a civilizations progress.

b)true

c)"white people"
L M A O plz

Of course their DNA is present in all europeans. Human migration went from middle east to europe.

[WarriorRustler]

Different 'breeds' of dogs are only recognized by the American Kennel Club and are nothing short of humans selective breeding for specific traits in a dog's appearance, typically via incest. I don't know why racists like you LOVE that analogy, since it's completely wrong and just shows your lack of understanding of biology, evolution, and canine genetics.

All dogs can breed among themselves perfectly fine, none are hybrids. A horse and a mule are different subspecies from each other, a border collie and a shepherd are the same exact species. Most of these breeds only appeared about 100 years ago, so to think that there would be THAT much genetic variation that appeared NATURALLY (ie not dependent on human intervention) is laughable as fuk.

Different breeds of dog aren't 'smarter' than other breeds, either. They're pretty much all the same intelligence, it's their behaviour that matters when training them. Some dogs naturally have a higher curiosity and need for human approval than other dogs, even within the same breed (German Shepherds can either be extremely lazy or extremely attentive, same with Border Collies). Another thing is environment.. who buys shih-tzus? Typically dumb women who only enter them into dog shows, and not people who train things like flyball, schutzhund, and tracking. It's not like a shih-tzu can't be taught tricks, it's the people who buy them that treat them like a cat.

This is one extremely dumb post. Behavior is linked with intelligence. Yes different dog breeds have varying levels of intelligence and to dispute that is to dispute the science behind breeding.