2016 Spurs > 96 bulls

[sdballer5588]

It's amazing how dumb you can be and have people agree with you as long as there is a well known fact you state beforehand. In this case as long as you recognize Jordan is the GOAT, you are pretty much given free reign to follow it up with anything stupid you feel like saying.

[TheFornicator1]

Lol, how long did it take you to browse through Wikipedia to come up with this post? 2 hours? lol.

Age: 22

Not sure if srs. The Knicks/Bulls series of '92 is one of the best series of all time, completely unforgettable. The '98 Pacers/Bulls rivalry series was top-tier. The '96 Magic was the team Jordan was getting revenge on for the previous year.

There's literally nothing there that requires Wikipedia if you've watched more basketball than a few random LeBron/Steph Curry games.

[DGen94]

lol at posting gifs.

[DGen94]

Age: 22

Not sure if srs. The Knicks/Bulls series of '92 is one of the best series of all time, completely unforgettable. The '98 Pacers/Bulls rivalry series was top-tier. The '96 Magic was the team Jordan was getting revenge on for the previous year.

There's literally nothing there that requires Wikipedia if you've watched more basketball than a few random LeBron/Steph Curry games.

You never even saw him play besides youtube highlights.. How would you know? Every NBA player has competition. Do you know how hard it is to make it to the NBA much less become a HOFer? You probably couldn't even make your HS bball team.

btw, Do you know how many HOFers MJ played against? It was a lot.

I'm out of hear. Done listening to a bunch of early 20-year-olds talk about MJ like they are some experts.

Teams ranking on who Jordan and Lebron faced in the finals. whos team was tougher? worthy was injured in the 91 lakers too. LOL spurs would beat or at least give bulls a run for their money. with the 16 team being up there. stop denying it acting like bulls didnt lose any games.

1. 2007 Spurs (LeBron)
2. 1991 Lakers (Jordan)
3. 2011 Mavericks (LeBron)
4. 1997 Jazz (Jordan)
5. 1998 Jazz (Jordan)
6. 2013 Spurs (LeBron)
7. 2012 Thunder (LeBron)
8. 1993 Suns (Jordan)
9. 1996 Sonics (Jordan)
10. 1992 Blazers (Jordan)

[broboma2012]

Teams ranking on who Jordan and Lebron faced in the finals. whos team was tougher? worthy was injured in the 91 lakers too. LOL spurs would beat or at least give bulls a run for their money. with the 16 team being up there. stop denying it acting like bulls didnt lose any games.

1. 2007 Spurs (LeBron)
2. 1991 Lakers (Jordan)
3. 2011 Mavericks (LeBron)
4. 1997 Jazz (Jordan)
5. 1998 Jazz (Jordan)
6. 2013 Spurs (LeBron)
7. 2012 Thunder (LeBron)
8. 1993 Suns (Jordan)
9. 1996 Sonics (Jordan)
10. 1992 Blazers (Jordan)

Lol at you having to put the mavs at #3 to avoid the uncomfortable truth that lebron LOST to one of the least talented teams on that list. I see you.

[HotCheetos]

Dude, I am basketball expert and clearly you are not. Just because you all hall of famer doesn't necessarily mean you have faced some tough opponents. Mj clearly had it easy in the 90s with bulls the sole relevant team. Knicks, pacers were big time chockers with guys like Ewing missing game winning layups. The pistons and the celtics had died already by then with Isiah's and bird's retirement. Kareem and Magic both retired from Bball as well. When mj really had competition in the 80s(celtics and pistons), he never made it past the second round.

The only good teams left in the 90s were the rockets with hakeem as their leader. Too bad mj retired for 2 years(94-95) otherwise he would have gotten wrecked by hakeem. Also, he never played a game 7(finals)in his entire career; that should tell you how pathetic his competition really was in the 90s. Put any good player in that bulls team and he wins 6 ships.

Lol you are such a clown kid. Let's act like not going 7 games makes the Bulls competition worse and has no relevance to making the Bulls just that much better than other teams. Your mom should revoke your internet privileges for a month after that post.

[broboma2012]

Lol you are such a clown kid. Let's act like not going 7 games makes the Bulls competition worse and has no relevance to making the Bulls just that much better than other teams. Your mom should revoke your internet privileges for a month after that post.

Logic itt: winning more=bad

Mj shoulda lost a few to legitimize his success I guess? Makes perfect sense

[sdballer5588]

Logic itt: winning more=bad

Mj shoulda lost a few to legitimize his success I guess? Makes perfect sense

The irony here being you penalize LeBron for making the Finals. Which is winning. By your own admission you have stated lebron would have been better off out in the first round rather than HOW he lost in 2011.


That's the definition of subjective, but you constantly argue as if this is objective reality, which it isn't.

[DGen94]

Lol at you having to put the mavs at #3 to avoid the uncomfortable truth that lebron LOST to one of the least talented teams on that list. I see you.

least talented? lol dallas beat the thunder (durant,westbrook,harden) three future hall of famers and the lakers with kobe, pau, bynum. better teams than what the bulls played

[4backcracks]

Most of you here were trying not to **** your pants in 1996.

And you were 10 or 11. GTFO acting like your memories of watching NBA basketball at age 10 have any bearing on this discussion.

[waddupi]

Lol you are such a clown kid. Let's act like not going 7 games makes the Bulls competition worse and has no relevance to making the Bulls just that much better than other teams. Your mom should revoke your internet privileges for a month after that post.

Lol at calling people kid. How old were you when Mj was getting eliminated in the first round? 4 or 5 year old. You can't really play the devil advocate here. You were just old enough to watch mj play in the late 90s, not in the 80s when he really had some competition. Fact of the matter is that lebron is better than mj as far as pure talent is concerned. Key word, "TALENT". Accept facts, old guy.

[ThickMeat]

96 sonics would win the title this year easily

[ThickMeat]

Teams ranking on who Jordan and Lebron faced in the finals. whos team was tougher? worthy was injured in the 91 lakers too. LOL spurs would beat or at least give bulls a run for their money. with the 16 team being up there. stop denying it acting like bulls didnt lose any games.

1. 2007 Spurs (LeBron)
2. 1991 Lakers (Jordan)
3. 2011 Mavericks (LeBron)
4. 1997 Jazz (Jordan)
5. 1998 Jazz (Jordan)
6. 2013 Spurs (LeBron)
7. 2012 Thunder (LeBron)
8. 1993 Suns (Jordan)
9. 1996 Sonics (Jordan)
10. 1992 Blazers (Jordan)

lol at having mavericks up that high that team was garbage and old. all lebron had to do was playing well ( not great just well) and they wouldve won but he sucked

lol at 07 spurs who are probably the worst spurs championship team

[DGen94]

96 sonics would win the title this year easily

yeah ok buddy. they would be this generations clippers.

blake=kemp
cp3= payton

[ThickMeat]

yeah ok buddy. they would be this generations clippers.

blake=kemp
cp3= payton

when did the clippers reach the finals?

[broboma2012]

The irony here being you penalize LeBron for making the Finals. Which is winning. By your own admission you have stated lebron would have been better off out in the first round rather than HOW he lost in 2011.


That's the definition of subjective, but you constantly argue as if this is objective reality, which it isn't.

The only thing I have ever penalized lebron for in the goat discussion is his performances.

By my own admission? What you said has no basis in anything I have said. If lebron had his 11 finals meltdown in the first round and the heat lost, that would have been exponentially worse

[broboma2012]

least talented? lol dallas beat the thunder (durant,westbrook,harden) three future hall of famers and the lakers with kobe, pau, bynum. better teams than what the bulls played

Keep propping up one of the least talented teams to win the title in the last 30 years

[DefensiveEnd896]

Dude, I am basketball expert and clearly you are not. Just because you all hall of famer doesn't necessarily mean you have faced some tough opponents. Mj clearly had it easy in the 90s with bulls the sole relevant team. Knicks, pacers were big time chockers with guys like Ewing missing game winning layups. The pistons and the celtics had died already by then with Isiah's and bird's retirement. Kareem and Magic both retired from Bball as well. When mj really had competition in the 80s(celtics and pistons), he never made it past the second round.

The only good teams left in the 90s were the rockets with hakeem as their leader. Too bad mj retired for 2 years(94-95) otherwise he would have gotten wrecked by hakeem. Also, he never played a game 7(finals)in his entire career; that should tell you how pathetic his competition really was in the 90s. Put any good player in that bulls team and he wins 6 ships.

What makes you an expert? Have you ever played in the NBA? Are you an NBA coach? Player? Did you even make your HS bball team? Are you an analyst for ESPN that talks about sports for a living? Get of here with that "expert" crap.

You think because you watch a lot of basketball and post on an internet message board that makes you an expert? Lol....

You are not an expert. You are a fan just like all of us..

Also this thread is about 2016 Spurs vs 1996 Bulls not MJ vs LeBron... Get over LeBron already... He has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.

[thecurrymamba]

Keep propping up one of the least talented teams to win the title in the last 30 years

This.

Lol @ taking advantage of a transition year and beating an immature OKC, a declining Lakers with one-legged Kobe and invisible Pau/Odom, taken to 6 by 6th seed Portland, all while avoiding a healthy 1st seed 60-win Spurs.

Just because Lebron couldn't score against Jason Terry and JJ Barea doesn't make the Mavs "talented." Jason Kidd was washed up and Deshawn fkn Stevenson was a starter lmao.

[DGen94]

This.

Lol @ taking advantage of a transition year and beating an immature OKC, a declining Lakers with one-legged Kobe and invisible Pau/Odom, taken to 6 by 6th seed Portland, all while avoiding a healthy 1st seed 60-win Spurs.

Just because Lebron couldn't score against Jason Terry and JJ Barea doesn't make the Mavs "talented." Jason Kidd was washed up and Deshawn fkn Stevenson was a starter lmao.

spurs>bulls

[StrapNScrap21]

Can we at least wait for the season to end before we start comparing Elo ratings?

[StrapNScrap21]

Keep propping up one of the least talented teams to win the title in the last 30 years

The 2011 Mavs have the 45th best Elo rating in NBA history at 1705. 5 points higher than the 2010 Champion Lakers, for reference.

[StrapNScrap21]

The 2011 Mavs have the 45th best Elo rating in NBA history at 1705. 5 points higher than the 2010 Champion Lakers, for reference.

The 2004 Pistons clock in at 81st with a composite of 1684.

[broboma2012]

The 2004 Pistons clock in at 81st with a composite of 1684.

thanks for proving that the mavs are one of the least talented teams to win the title in the last 30 years

[BeastModeFTW]

lmao

[blue4113]

lmao

ahahahahahhahaahahahahha



























ahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahah

[BeastModeFTW]

lmao

[thehypocrit]

when did the clippers reach the finals?

That's the joke..

[MesoPeaks]

LOL @ this thread

Chicago Bulls Champions with MJ in it is the GOAT team EVER!

[DefensiveEnd896]

Lmao... If anything, this thread should be about the Warriors, not the Spurs.. And I am saying this as a Spurs fan..

OP is an idiot... Why don't you wait until the season is over before you compare teams to the 72-10 Bulls?