UK will be bombing Syria then.

[SiberianExpress]

They voted and it's confirmed.

[TheFuarkingBoss]

Be on the lookout for terrorist attacks coming our way now

[TheAdz95]

Those Mohammedans in Syria are not causing one fkn problem to Britain.
Instead of beating around the bush mr Cameron how about closing your borders and dealing with the already growing problem within Britain itself?!
After all they are letting these jihadists in, and that's where terrorist attacks are likely to occur.
My god, the stupidity.

[berniebro]

winning over the middle east with one death shower after another.

[Bishamon]

oh god, what a surprise!!!!!




....

[SiberianExpress]

Be on the lookout for terrorist attacks coming our way now

To be fair the UK is constantly at a very high risk of terrorism. This will make it even more so but honestly how much more under threat can we be?

[iNoahGuy]

oh god, what a surprise!!!!!

....

This..

[Wh1teDyn0mite]

Democracy Manifest.

[Didlid]

Those Mohammedans in Syria are not causing one fkn problem to Britain.
Instead of beating around the bush mr Cameron how about closing your borders and dealing with the already growing problem within Britain itself?!
After all they are letting these jihadists in, and that's where terrorist attacks are likely to occur.
My god, the stupidity.

This lol its not like attacks are happening from syria, they're happening within our own countries.


Let a bunch of the kunts into the UK
Bomb the country the came from

wtf is the point in that when they're all spread across Europe now... syria is probably empty lmao

[unknown6551]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-34961844

Key Points

MPs vote by 397 to 223 to authorise UK air strikes against so-called Islamic State in Syria

During a 10-hour debate, David Cameron urged Tory MPs to 'take a stand' against IS

But the prime minister was criticised for branding Jeremy Corbyn a "terrorist sympathiser"

Jeremy Corbyn said the PM's case "does not add up" and could make the situation worse

Shadow home secretary Hilary Benn was applauded by MPs after urging Labour to "confront the evil" of IS

Despite Tory rebels, PM expected to win helped by votes of some Labour MPs, the Lib Dems and DUP

A separate cross-party amendment opposing airstrikes was defeated by 390 votes to 211

[NasStan]

I would have no problem voting for bombings if there was an actual long term plan in place.

This just reeks of short-termism/reactionary thinking. You won;t defeat ISIS unless you have troops on the ground and Cameron's answer to those troops on the ground was weak. An exaggerated number and he couldn't even define the make up of the troops.

You don't win unless there's cohesion from the allies but there isn;t. Erdogan would prefer Kurds dead rather than ISIS. Putin kills both ISIS and Assad opponents equally, those opponents being the same ground troops Cameron was referring to. What an absolute clusterfuk.

Air strikes will do jack **** in the long term. Watch this become another fuk up.

The Labour Party is fuked now as well.

Cameron is laughing.

He made the debate into two sides

1) Bomb Syria
2) Do nothing ("terrorist sympathisers - what a kunt)

Everyone with a brain cell knows that second option wasn't "do nothing", but the opposition made it seem like that as they did not put enough of an argument up.

[KizzaK]

Be on the lookout for terrorist attacks coming our way now

Nah. It's the other way round.

If the vote was a no, we would've had a terror act and retrospective action so Cameron can get his wish.

Just lol if you think a bunch of ****ing sand people can orchestrate and execute these attacks.

[SiberianExpress]

I would have no problem voting for bombings if there was an actual long term plan in place.

This just reeks of short-termism/reactionary thinking. You won;t defeat ISIS unless you have troops on the ground and Cameron's answer to those troops on the ground was weak. An exaggerated number and he couldn't even define the make up of the troops.

You don't win unless there's cohesion from the allies but there isn;t. Erdogan would prefer Kurds dead rather than ISIS. Putin kills both ISIS and Assad opponents equally, those opponents being the same ground troops Cameron was referring to. What an absolute clusterfuk.

Air strikes will do jack **** in the long term. Watch this become another fuk up.

The Labour Party is fuked now as well.

Cameron is laughing.

I agree and I'll be interested to see how we get ourselves out of it. We either have a case of mission creep, although a full scale Afghanistan or Iraq style war is very unlikely atm.....or we just admit defeat in a few years and Westminster spins it all whilst the French and Americans do the same. Madness.

[Peasantfighter]

nice one David, sounds like a great way to spend taxpayers money.

meanwhile 50 miles away in calais we have these folks roaming around unchallenged desperate to reach British spoil.

[earwax]

Be on the lookout for terrorist attacks coming our way now

This.

No way should the UK be following the US's retarded footsteps.

[AverageKenneth]

Agreed, massive waste of money and completely pointless as pretty much every other country is bombing them. May as well save our pennies, sit back and watch the fireworks.

[mosaicbrah]

heard germanys in on the mix as well now..

[NasStan]

I agree and I'll be interested to see how we get ourselves out of it. We either have a case of mission creep, although a full scale Afghanistan or Iraq style war is very unlikely atm.....or we just admit defeat in a few years and Westminster spins it all whilst the French and Americans do the same. Madness.

Exactly. It's not about being a pacifist, but being a pragmatist.

Thing is, just because Iraq was a fuk up it doesn't mean we shouldn't intervene in situations like this. We saw it in the 90's with the US, they fuked up in ****lia, which meant they hesitated going into Rwanda, which ended in genocide. Fact is these decisions are difficult and you can;t seem to win no matter which way you go.

But, with so many nations at play here though, with different objectives, the biggest debate should have been on post-war Syria, and how to make sure it doesn;t become another vacuum for an extremist party. How to make sure we don;t end up training and arming another Taliban or ISIS. Surely tey should sense a pattern here instead of jumping straight in. All we got were mainly emotional arguments about what happened in France and how they've asked for help.

The opposition debated that poorly, disappointed. Felt like it should have waited a few more weeks rather then so soon after an attack on France, a country that was already bombing in Syria.

[aranadiscoteca]

About damn time too.

[Dormbrah]

well this is a good time to not be from Europe. you Eurasian brahs are retarded

[SiberianExpress]

heard germanys in on the mix as well now..

In a non combat role apparently. One of their frigates will be helping the French in the Mediterranean as well as a fairly large number of non combat personnel in other roles.

[earwax]

RAF deploying Typhoons and Tornados in a few hours. Brahs living in the capital stay safe. God knows that's where the next terror attack will be.

[AverageKenneth]

Brimstone missiles cost about a hundred grand each. That's just one of the weapons we'll be using along with the various other costs that come with a bombing campaign.

Austerity my fukin hole.

[SiberianExpress]

Exactly. It's not about being a pacifist, but being a pragmatist.

Thing is, just because Iraq was a fuk up it doesn't mean we shouldn't intervene in situations like this. We saw it in the 90's with the US, they fuked up in ****lia, which meant they hesitated going into Rwanda, which ended in genocide. Fact is these decisions are difficult and you can;t seem to win no matter which way you go.

But, with so many nations at play here though, with different objectives, the biggest debate should have been on post-war Syria, and how to make sure it doesn;t become another vacuum for an extremist party. How to make sure we don;t end up training and arming another Taliban or ISIS. Surely tey should sense a pattern here instead of jumping straight in. All we got were mainly emotional arguments about what happened in France and how they've asked for help.

The opposition debated that poorly, disappointed. Felt like it should have waited a few more weeks rather then so soon after an attack on France, a country that was already bombing in Syria.

Yep, all correct. I also think the politicians are fools because has it occurred to them that this is exactly what ISIS wants? Do you think that ISIS were surprised in the slightest that French air strikes intensified after the Paris attacks? Do you think ISIS is surprised that French allies are doing the same? They've set the plan and we're following it like a bunch of brain dead idiots.

[TheAdz95]

Those Mohammedans in Syria are not causing one fkn problem to Britain.
Instead of beating around the bush mr Cameron how about closing your borders and dealing with the already growing problem within Britain itself?!
After all they are letting these jihadists in, and that's where terrorist attacks are likely to occur.
My god, the stupidity.

Quoting so retards can see this.

[Fatmax1]

Brimstone missiles cost about a hundred grand each. That's just one of the weapons we'll be using along with the various other costs that come with a bombing campaign.

Austerity my fukin hole.

Fck do you want instead? boots on the ground? This war, regardless of how it was started, is going to happen and spending tax payers money instead of tax payers lives to end it seems reasonable to me.

[SiberianExpress]

Brimstone missiles cost about a hundred grand each. That's just one of the weapons we'll be using along with the various other costs that come with a bombing campaign.

Austerity my fukin hole.

Lol. We're making cuts all over the place but we can afford this? How many police or military wages could be saved per missile? You could employ 5 Royal Marines for a year and probably have change, for the cost of one missile.

[SiberianExpress]

Fck do you want instead? boots on the ground? This war, regardless of how it was started, is going to happen and spending tax payers money instead of tax payers lives to end it seems reasonable to me.

How about spending the money on more intelligent and effective forms of defence?

[BustaCapp]

[Snowy0wl]

Lol. We're making cuts all over the place but we can afford this? How many police or military wages could be saved per missile? You could employ 5 Royal Marines for a year and probably have change, for the cost of one missile.

A lot of the defence industry is UK based, it's good for your GDP