|
-
09-01-2015, 07:24 PM #31
-
09-01-2015, 08:03 PM #32
-
-
09-01-2015, 08:13 PM #33
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 75
- Posts: 4,873
- Rep Power: 14837
-
09-01-2015, 08:24 PM #34
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24714538
http://www.lookgreatnaked.com/blog/b...th-and-muscle/
Effects of different volume-equated resistance training loading strategies on muscular adaptations in well-trained men.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23955603
http://www.lookgreatnaked.com/articl...daptations.pdf
Is there a minimum intensity threshold for resistance training-induced hypertrophic adaptations?
These seem relevant to the topic.
I think it's clear in anecdotal accounts and in studies that if one wants to perform well with 1RM lifts, one needs to practice high % lifts on some regular rotation.
As for hypertrophy, above study suggests it's moot given a sensible program, tonnage, % of max appropriate for the volume at hand in terms of "heavy" vs "HEAVY." BUt I think you have to be cautious with "Light " weights, see second links.The most important aspect of weight training; whether for the athlete, bodybuilder, or average person is to better ones health and ability without injury. - Bill Pearl
-
09-01-2015, 09:35 PM #35
- Join Date: Oct 2008
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 62
- Posts: 11,649
- Rep Power: 124140
-
09-03-2015, 10:20 PM #36
-
-
09-04-2015, 06:06 AM #37
- Join Date: Dec 2005
- Location: Bronx, New York, United States
- Age: 59
- Posts: 43,414
- Rep Power: 198265
IMO to get the best out of your workout and last a long time doing it, it is best to include, heavy, medium and light routines in your schedule.
I don't think (at least in my opinion) you can get that "mature mass" without lifting heavy, it is the foundation of gaining size, but when I say heavy I mean heavy but with reps of 6-8, not so heavy where you are doing singles to 3 reps.
Also for natural lifters this is the best way. Anyone "on" can stay heavy for lengths of time and can also lift light and see results, but for those who are not on they will need to do both, heavy and light to get the best out of this.Last edited by bodyhard; 09-04-2015 at 07:08 AM.
On the list for Bannukah
-
09-04-2015, 07:05 AM #38
-
09-04-2015, 07:25 AM #39
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Age: 57
- Posts: 4,946
- Rep Power: 34073
I'm surprised about the top post saying that. I thought a lot of ladies in the female section were powerlifters. I saw some pretty serious stats (like yours).
Does this post tie the rep range recommendation for female to a specific goal (specific esthetics/looks, specific sport, powerlifting stats, etc) and length of training? Because really, much beyond gender, programs and rep range should be tied to what you want to accomplish and where you are coming from. (i.e. I'm stuck at 20 reps for my hip rehab when my heart really wants to squats heavy 4-5 reps )
No one magic bullet. I'm sad to see that the whole "pink dumbbells for woman" myth still exists here.
I do remember someone bringing up a "study" about women needing to go lighter last year but it was quickly debunked as bad science (correlation not causation, very small sample range of very specific population).
What I have learned is basically what BH is saying, mix it up.** Marie **
"Don't wish it was easier, wish you were better. Don't wish for less problems, wish for more skills. Don't wish for less challenge, wish for more wisdom." - Jim Rohn
OV35 Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157469793
-
09-04-2015, 08:14 AM #40
Less work....more rest. I have used chiro to help with rehabbing injuries, but never used it for "recovery". I dont take any "joint support", but I do supplement fish oil @ 6g/day. That is supposed to have good anti inflammatory benefits (among other things)
I also take "XXXX" but we are not allowed to say that. But truth be told, I never saw a huge change in my recovery abilities. I have reached the limits of my recovery with as little as one working set a week on deads. (when I was doing one set a week with 585 to see how many reps I could get...when I got to 585x7, my body had had enough and I had to take a few weeks off).
I am a big believer in not killing myself in the gym. Sure I workout hard, but I never puke my guts out. Maybe I am doing it wrong . The intensity of exerting max effort for 4-8 reps is a lot different than doing it for 20. That goes back to the study finding about perceived exertion levels.
Heck, 5/3/1 I almost felt like I was loafing it in the gym....yet at 4 months it hit me like a wall and I had to back off.
So as to your original question, I have gotten to the point where I can feel where I am at and what my body can take. There is a big difference between chronic lack of recovery and just missing a nights rest. I have learned when to push through....and when to back off. (although I do not always have the self discipline to listen to my inner voice.) That is when I end up injuring myself. Thankfully, I have not done anything stupid in a few years and I am learning that taking a light day is not the end of the world.Last edited by induced_drag; 09-04-2015 at 08:20 AM.
RAW lifts
635 Dead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mATRBZ0gwdg
585x7 Dead reps http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yf2ZkdNNNQ
420 Bench (paused) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ2_Q-TLIB8
535 Squat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdgVaiTi4-8&feature=youtu.be
-
-
09-04-2015, 10:13 AM #41
-
09-04-2015, 10:24 AM #42
Its slightly off topic, but I am looking for a way to improve my weighted pull-ups...I've been stuck on 160 for a 1 rep max for a while (maybe because I am bulking and I have to lift my BW?), and even though I progress in rep numbers at 95 pounds it doesn't seem to help. Any thoughts you can give me?
And yes I agree you have to lift heavy to progress. I don't do more than 12 reps unless its an iso leg movement like extensions I throw in at the end of my workout for the heck of it.Its not enough!
-
09-04-2015, 11:01 AM #43
-
09-04-2015, 11:38 AM #44
I have this problem. I push and push and end up where I am right now, forced to take time off due to injuries that just aren't going away. I just finished a week completely off, and I'm still sore like I've been training most of the week, along with some tendon/ligament/joint pain that has been pretty persistent for a while. I know we all hate this word, but I think there has been some overtraining going on. I'm going to spend at least another week off with a higher intake and see where it goes from there. I'm going to give Wendler 5/3/1 a whirl when I come back.
-
-
09-04-2015, 12:26 PM #45
On most exercises, I try to improve my 3-5 rep working weights and it always resulted in me improving my 1rm. I would be careful though.... I stopped doing heavy weighted pull ups as they were hell on tendentious for me. Made my elbows and especially biceps scream.
Yea....not going into too much detail, I would guess the 'magic' happens at higher levels of supplementation. These guys that say they can workout 5-6 days a week...etc. I have never seen this. Just getting back to normalized levels, I think improved a lot for me, but recovery is not one I remember. I have "dabbled" with more but very conservatively. I guess most "vets" would say I was still on training wheels rather then full riding the bike like the "big boys". As of right now, I dont have any plans to go "there" as I have accomplished most of my training goals without having too. I dont want to be reliant on riding a bike to keep my physique. I am not 25 any more, and my goals of general health and being around long term over rule the notion of getting HOOOGUE.
In keeping with the full disclosure, I have put on 5-7 lbs in the last 2 years. I am not sure I would have been able to do that on my own...(although I had only been back 3 years and I doubt I was at my peak). I do doubt I could ever have get much bigger than I am now. I do believe I would be just as strong though. Which in a way sucks...as I could have done very well competing in TRUE drug free lifting. But getting my life back normal is worth more to me than trophies and plaques. I do kinda wonder what I could do strength wise if I really did what the big guys do. But again......it is just not worth it for me at this point in my life.
Thanks for the kind words.RAW lifts
635 Dead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mATRBZ0gwdg
585x7 Dead reps http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yf2ZkdNNNQ
420 Bench (paused) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ2_Q-TLIB8
535 Squat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdgVaiTi4-8&feature=youtu.be
-
09-04-2015, 12:58 PM #46
Thanks ID, I think that may be it...I've improved my rep numbers from 4-5 to 6-7 at 90/95 but haven't added any weight. Maybe I just need to work with 100/105.
I experience no tendinitis on weighted pull ups, but Dips and any heavy benching activity seem to cause it, so I've stopped benching heavy and gone to DB bench, which for some reason doesn't.Its not enough!
-
09-04-2015, 01:45 PM #47
-
09-05-2015, 02:14 AM #48
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 75
- Posts: 4,873
- Rep Power: 14837
The perceived exertion is an enlightening part of the study. Even we physique guys know you need to train heavy for bigger muscles. The high reps and drop sets are necessary for cute muscles, that can be painful and a test for it tolerance. Your training is more taxing on the body and it appears you are making the adjustments.
How can you visualize training a muscle if you don't know its structure?
-
-
09-08-2015, 09:38 AM #49
Typing from mobile phone but go to 6:45 and we can discuss more, later.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=s2UliwvEB1M
-
09-10-2015, 07:29 AM #50
more food for thought
http://www.ergo-log.com/muscle-growt...-training.html
-
09-10-2015, 07:40 AM #51
"The researchers got ten well-trained men to train their legs on two different occasions by doing squats, leg presses, leg extensions, leg curs and calf raises. "
They gave 10 men 1 session each of the 2 methods. Are you having a fking laugh? These people call themselves researchers? They should be ashamed of themselves.Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
-
09-10-2015, 07:54 AM #52
Nothing conclusive or definitive there but a nice study on a very small sample size. I believe that in the beginning of a lifter's career the heavy stuff is probably more important. After you've built the base of muscle with heavy compounds, is likely to be much easier to maintain or make smaller incremental strength and size gains working in the higher rep ranges. This is only a not so educated guess, but it makes sense in my head.
My vids: youtube.com/channel/UCXYsnKrrmhI9oPzfzkn8NsA
Strong e-stat crew checking in
-
-
09-10-2015, 08:11 AM #53
Its interesting to just look at the biggest natties and what they did and do.
While many may work in 3x15, 5x9, 4x10 rep ranges at a 10RM+/-, you have to look at the loads they are shifting.
The repetition method builds size end of story. But folks want to train like an advanced lifter too soon too often.
Thing is is natties only have so much recovery, and what a lifter blows on fluff, well you cant un fluff the fluff. Too much volume, with too little load, too soon, just saps recovery and is about like doing Zumba.
Of course we all want to pattern out training after the most advanced, most durable, genetic freak out there and wonder why we dont get results. Im using the term we in the global sense though. Nothing about you JB.The most important aspect of weight training; whether for the athlete, bodybuilder, or average person is to better ones health and ability without injury. - Bill Pearl
-
09-10-2015, 08:37 AM #54
This is why it's important for people to experiment and figure out what works on an individual level. I am a believer in volume and time under tension while lifting as heavy as possible in all of the rep ranges. Once a lifter starts understanding and listening to his/her own body and trains/eats consistently and with purpose, that's when the magic happens. I don't believe there is a cookie cutter or one size fits all training solution for everyone.
My vids: youtube.com/channel/UCXYsnKrrmhI9oPzfzkn8NsA
Strong e-stat crew checking in
-
09-10-2015, 12:15 PM #55
-
09-10-2015, 12:15 PM #56
Its cookie cutter, ID is right.
There simply arent any big weak natties. Volume work does not promote strength as well. Natties only have so much to give. Game over.
Now that i beat the obvious into the ground. People should train as they see fit, enjoy the process etc.
I agree with you 100% for folks that already have massive strength. Oddly most if them keep right on with significant low volume in their programs, (and add volume work) because their work capacity has grown so much.
Although there are those that use exclusively higher volume work, but look at their tonnage.The most important aspect of weight training; whether for the athlete, bodybuilder, or average person is to better ones health and ability without injury. - Bill Pearl
-
-
09-10-2015, 12:16 PM #57
-
09-10-2015, 04:15 PM #58
So far I've done the same routine 27 out of 30 days at varying intensities.
The good news is I've added major rom to all lifts and my rpe is way easier. Things that were tough are now dynamic lifts. I have a lite week this week then a 1rm test. My guess is my bench is up 20, squats up 20, weighted pullups up 30, and military (true military press) up 10. I actually lost a few pounds at constant 3200 calories, but I feel bigger.
The only bad news is my left forearm / elbow hurt like hell from the weighted pullups .
The weights I will try to hit are
Bench 235, rows 235, pullups 80, military 135, squat 335. None are PR's, but pretty close. Considering all I've done is hypertrophy for the past 2 years due to shoulder, I'll take it.
-
09-20-2015, 05:27 AM #59
-
09-20-2015, 10:11 AM #60
Bookmarks