|
-
07-26-2015, 09:01 AM #91
-
07-26-2015, 09:43 AM #92
-
-
07-26-2015, 10:48 AM #93
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 73,713
- Rep Power: 248605
Because the knows full well the people saying that are diehards who will support it no matter what. People have spent the last 15 odd years whining about the WWE & how thye will never buy another PPV, watch Raw or Smackdown, go to an arena show etc-yet they are back a week or month later moaning about it all over again & saying the same stuff. Dana cares about the casual fans, not the hardcores who will be there no matter what.
AP5 Crew
-
07-26-2015, 11:28 AM #94
-
07-26-2015, 12:52 PM #95
Damn Dana is such a glorious winged *******. Hes on another level when it comes to pure *******ry.
For every man, there is a sentence, a string of words, that has the power to destroy him
"The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must" -Thucydides
Shall not be Infringed. FUK CHINA.
-
07-26-2015, 01:10 PM #96
I cancelled fightpass over how it was handled with the changing of ufc's cable partners here in Canada as well as the lack of effort to release a playstation app. Dana may 'know' die hards will suppport it. However presuming it wont impact your bottom line and openly sh*tting on the fanbase who kept ufc afloat during the dark days of ppv blackouts and fighting on indian land just further demonstrates his lack of character
-
-
07-26-2015, 01:45 PM #97
Now Connor is refusing to wear the Reebok gear and is punking Dana out in front of everyone: http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/7/25...ear-reebok-kit
-
07-26-2015, 01:52 PM #98
-
07-26-2015, 02:23 PM #99
-
07-26-2015, 02:57 PM #100
-
-
07-26-2015, 05:02 PM #101
-
07-26-2015, 05:28 PM #102
-
07-26-2015, 06:06 PM #103
-
07-26-2015, 06:13 PM #104
-
-
07-26-2015, 06:18 PM #105
-
07-26-2015, 06:33 PM #106
-
07-26-2015, 06:42 PM #107
-
07-26-2015, 07:14 PM #108
-
-
07-26-2015, 08:35 PM #109
Lol i dont get it, do people want to see the fights or not ?
why do people give a **** if the cutman gets dropped from the UFC.
like dana said hes not friends with stitch, never was, and its not his job to comfort him.
I hate dana as much as the next MMA section member, but only for reasons like his sucking conors dick over the long time champ aldo. and letting aldo be harassed on tour the entire time. U can bet ur ass if aldo took a swing at conor dana would be the first person to sue his ass.Current Running Vert 35-36 Inch - Goal 43 Inch
Goal weight - 175
-
08-19-2015, 05:20 PM #110
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
- Posts: 19,582
- Rep Power: 301058
Update - UFC exec: Stitch's Reebok 'comments had nothing to do' with firing
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/8/19...do-with-firing
By Zane Simon
@TheZaneSimon on Aug 19, 2015, 5:30p 77
Ethan Miller/Getty Images
It looks like the UFC is looking to change the narrative on Stitch Duran's recent firing as Lawrence Epstein recently made it clear that Duran's Reebok comments had nothing to do with it.
Tweet (37) Share
Pin
Well, this is awkward. Weeks after noted cutman Stitch Duran was fired from his position with the UFC (shortly after speaking to Bloody Elbow about losses incurred by him and others in his field under the UFC's new Reebok deal), UFC exec Lawrence Epstein is now issuing a full denial as to just why Duran was let go from the company.
Shortly after his firing, Duran told Bloody Elbow explicitly that the UFC had made it clear to him that his dismissal was directly tied to his negative comments about Reebok. "I got a call and basically was told that they - and they didn't throw names out - but they don't want you to work any more UFC shows based on the article regarding the Reebok deal."
And since those comments were made, that's been more or less the official story on it. UFC commentator Joe Rogan reiterated the story on a recent episode of his podcast: "So, anytime someone like Stitch gets fired because he said something about, 'Hey, this deal kinda sucks for me because I'm not making as much money,' they fire him."
Dana White didn't contradict that narrative when asked why he didn't personally handle Duran's dismissal, instead claiming that if he and Duran had been real friends, Duran would have come to him with his complaints, rather than airing them publicly.
Even Reebok representative Michael Lunardelli didn't offer any contradictions to the idea that Duran was fired over his comments about the sponsorship deal, when asked about the situation on the MMA Hour:
"I actually talked to Stitch before anyone in my own organization....I did. I just called him man to man. I got his phone number and dialed him up myself. I was on the road and just said, 'I'm going to call him and talk to him, see what's going on'. We had a great talk. We talked for about 40 minutes or so. It was man to man, just between him and I. It was a good discussion. It was great, I wish none of this happened, but it did and again, it's not something that's in our control.
"I had a very brief conversation with [UFC President] Dana [White]. Dana was great about it as he always is. He's like, 'That's not for you guys to worry about. That's between us. You guys shouldn't be taking any heat for that. Basically, that's our situation with our cutman. We're handling that'. That's basically what he said. That was it. You gotta find your place here. There's a place where you can speak up about things, and there's a place where you can't. We're focused on what our job is."
All of which makes Lawrence Epstein's recent comments about Duran's firing to the International Business Times seem like an especially dramatic shift from a story that had been pretty well accepted and spoken to by all parties involved:
"Unequivocally, his comments had nothing to do with him getting let go. I can't be more firm on that. There are a variety of reasons that he was let go, but nothing to do with his comments on Reebok," Epstein said. "He's trying to paint this thing as, he said some stuff about Reebok and as a result, he was let go. It's just not true. That's not the reason why he was let go. I can't be more clear on that."
Epstein's comments came as part of a larger story on the influence of sponsorship money in low paying sports, a landscape where the UFC is currently front and center alongside USA men's track and field.
With the general narrative on Duran as well established as it seemingly had been, Epstein may find himself having to be a lot more clear as to just why Duran was let go if he wants to downplay criticism of the UFC's partnership with Reebok. Especially since right now he seems to be the only one taking this stance. Bloody Elbow has reached out to the UFC for elaboration on his comments, but has yet to hear back at the time of publishing.
UPDATE: The UFC has responded to Bloody Elbow's request for clarification on Epstein's comments with the following statement:
"Jacob ‘Stitch' Duran has not been banned from UFC and he is free to corner any athlete if they choose to pay for his services. We want to provide other cutmen the opportunity to work UFC events. UFC certainly respects Duran's experience and accomplishments as a cutman, and wishes him the best. We will not comment about the other reasons that lead to the ending of his independent contractor agreement with UFC, other than to say it had nothing to do with his comments about Reebok."MinisterOfLust: scooterbrah and Mcfreoko are the two worst posters here.
-
08-19-2015, 05:39 PM #111
-
08-19-2015, 08:07 PM #112
-
-
08-19-2015, 08:45 PM #113
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
- Posts: 19,582
- Rep Power: 301058
im aware that they dont care what i think. but to sit there and say that stitch wasnt fired because of his reebok comments a month after dana more or less confirmed it was for said comments via what was said to the reebok guy clearly shows that they have no respect for anyone in their audience.
brb lets fire the best cutman in the sports history because we want to give others a chance brb. makes sense.MinisterOfLust: scooterbrah and Mcfreoko are the two worst posters here.
-
08-19-2015, 09:38 PM #114
Dude, Dana didn't say Stitch was fired for speaking out against the Reebok deal. He also didn't say:
-Aldo had a broken rib
-GSP owed it to the UFC to fight again
-GSP should "be a man" and answer Dana's calls
-Rumble was terrorized by his ex, even though he was sentenced for domestic abuse
-UFC 189 did over 1 million buys
He's just being misquoted.
-
08-20-2015, 12:18 AM #115
-
08-20-2015, 09:41 AM #116
I'm not talking about Stitch Duran anymore, because the despicable, I don't even know what to call them that work in this business that own some of these websites, it's one of these things where basically they lie about what I said. Not what I said and then turn it around and then by the time it gets translated into text verbatim to what I said it's even worse. It makes me sick and I'm not say anything about Stitch Duran.
-
-
08-20-2015, 03:06 PM #117
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
- Posts: 19,582
- Rep Power: 301058
Jacob Stitch Duran
********@StitchDuran
@TBarrabi Great story!Can't believe UFC attorney Lawrence Epstein said I was not let go because of my interview of the Reebok deal. Bull****
https://twitter.com/StitchDuran/stat...59154777227264
lol'd
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to AirJordanB again.
you forgot this
MinisterOfLust: scooterbrah and Mcfreoko are the two worst posters here.
Bookmarks